Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Lectura y Crítica

Rate this book
Lectura y crítica es el primer libro que escribió Raymond Williams, en 1958. Sin embargo, su obra recién se conoce a partir de Cultura y sociedad, publicado dos años después. En Lectura y crítica, que Ediciones Godot traduce por primera vez al castellano, ya se puede observar el estilo y la fineza con la que Raymond Williams desarrolla su propuesta teórica.

160 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1950

6 people are currently reading
51 people want to read

About the author

Raymond Williams

212 books275 followers
Raymond Henry Williams was a Welsh academic, novelist, and critic. He taught for many years and the Professor of Drama at the University of Cambridge. He was an influential figure within the New Left and in wider culture. His writings on politics, culture, the mass media and literature are a significant contribution to the Marxist critique of culture and the arts. His work laid the foundations for the field of cultural studies and the cultural materialist approach. Among his many books are Culture and Society, Culture and Materialism, Politics and Letters, Problems in Materialism and Culture, and several novels.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
4 (26%)
4 stars
6 (40%)
3 stars
4 (26%)
2 stars
1 (6%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for Samir Rawas Sarayji.
459 reviews104 followers
January 13, 2019
The premise of the book Reading and Criticism by Raymond Williams is to encourage ‘intelligent reading’, which according to the author is to read with an open, attentive mind, and to also focus on the use of language. Well… he might have been proud of GoodReads then since most of my GR friends read intelligently judging by their interests and their reviews. But let’s face facts, those who read intelligently are a small school of fish in the vast ocean, and Williams doesn’t shy away from expressing the drivel that most people read. In fact, the opening chapter analyzes some extracts of advertisements to show the level to which language is manipulated in order to serve a purpose. He then quickly uses this to express the same sentiments in news writing and how all this kind of quick, easy reading perpetuates commercial writing (aka ‘entertainment’ fiction). There’s a lot of merit to his arguments and his down-to-earth analysis, even though this book was published in 1950.

What I could mostly appreciate is the way he encourages readers to read analytically. It’s not academia and it doesn’t require skills that a regular reader can’t acquire. Chapter after chapter, he demonstrates how readers can make better sense of prose and verse by comparing extracts throughout with what he judges as ‘good’ writing and ‘mediocre’ writing – and I’m inclined to agree with his assessments here. It’s an easy book in the sense that technical jargon is not introduced. Instead, Williams relies on the ‘feel’ of language and what works, or not. This makes the book genuine in that it is indeed for readers seeking to learn how to read more critically, rather than it be a treatise on reading like some books end up being.

Every improvement in reading – the growth of awareness and flexibility and honesty – represents an advance similar, in its smaller degree, to the advance made by the work of a creative artist. For it, too, extends the boundaries of human consciousness and creates again the most permanent of human values. That is why it is a task important in itself, just as literature is important for its own sake. It is an importance that needs no apology, but rather allegiance and application.


I would love to see someone publish a book like this today to cover the same topic discussing contemporary fiction. It’s my only qualm with this book, that a British writer from a British university references the same classics (Lawrence, Conrad, Orwell…), although kudos that Williams references what was then contemporary in 1950.
Profile Image for Bibiana.
132 reviews91 followers
January 4, 2018
No me ha gustado nada. Esperaba algo “educativo” y solo son desvaríos del autor. Muy snob.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.