NOTE: I am going to review both 'Thea' and 'Thea II' here (copying same comments in each), so if that interferes with your plans, skip this now. I'm doing so because both books are quite short (not novellas per se but only just) and I don't want to overly inflate my yearly count (as such, I'm counting them both as 1 book and setting my 'read' date for the 2nd book at last year)! 'Thea' will get a 3-star nod while 'Thea II' will only be rated with 2, as the latter is much less sympathetic and only relies on 2 characters throughout.
The cover of this book says: "Thea: A Vampire Story"... however, this is NOT a vampire story. Yes, we eventually get to meet one (or more) vampires, but otherwise it's ONLY a very realistic story of family life in the modern era with a tiny bit of vampire content thrown in for flavouring. Steven Jenkins creates an extremely accurate (I assume) portrait of a single mother struggling with kids, abandonment, addiction and even worse. It seemed all the more real to me to me as my own daughter is the same age as Thea and to be honest, shares some of her more typical teenage characteristics (age 14 going on 24). And yes, I've reached for a bottle of whiskey or two in the past owing to some of these 'blessings' she has brought us!
However, what the book achieves in terms of painting a typical urban portrait - which continues as well into 'Thea II' just in a different setting and a change of 'parental player(s)' - it fails in terms of setting up any conflict whatsoever. Sure, vampires are to be dealt with lethally when found but as the world accepts them as existing, that's not really an issue. The only 'villains' we face for most of either of these books are the aforementioned challenges of trying to raise a child in the modern world with all that entails. The fact that the title child is eventually 'vampirized' seems even secondary if not tertiary to the entire conversation. Yes, Jenkins has an interesting take on how these vampires are created - even brutally so in Thea II - but that is not enough by any stretch of the imagination to carry these tales.
What little is available in terms of action is unsatisfyingly brief and incomplete at best. And are the 'invaders' really bad guys when all is said and done? Disappointing for sure as I find Jenkins to be an excellent wordsmith. I think in many ways, my 'poor' rating is due to the fact that I have so enjoyed the first two books of his 'Blue Skin' series which is as inventive as it is spell-binding! I'll also be checking out the entire 'Burn the Dead' as my new Kindle subscription prices them all within my budget!
Bottom line is that these are 'well'-written books but without the need oomph to keep the reader involved with ALL the issues at hand. Jenkins is a better writer and especialy a better 'imaginist' than either of these books prove to be. You can't win them all.