Accompanied with several artworks by the great painter, Antonello, this novel is Steve Katz’s first since his acclaimed Swanny’s Way. This magical fiction takes us from Rome and Venice to the heel of Italy, as two generations, father and son, engage in personal searches for meaning in their lives. Solomon, on a search for the paintings of the great Antonello and his son, Nathan, who follows in his father’s footsteps to discover more about the man. Will he choose love and life or the sterility of the past?
Steve Katz (May 14, 1935 – August 4, 2019) was an American writer. He is considered an early post-modern or avant-garde writer for works such as The Exagggerations of Peter Prince (1968), and Saw (1972).
Despite excessive repetition of “she kissed him on the cheek” (up to ten uses counted), “she rolled her eyes” (euugh), and the worst teenage rebel character ever written (in the like form of like Saffron), Katz succeeds in this Green Integer-shaped novel from 2004. Two narratives (father looking for nonexistent Antonello painting and son looking for nonexistent father) separate the novel and the plot is punctuated with high-tech Cal-tech yuppie satire, eloquent commentary on Antonello and art in general, some broad but believable characterisations, and fun road-trip energy and larks. Saffron is the smart-talking rebel with “tattooed lips” (eh?) who demonstrates that Katz is desperate to demonstrate his finger-on-the-pulseness of the kids today, and whose awkward dialogue is strange considering how well he renders the copious Italian phrases and dialects in the novel. Surreal and outrageous fancies keep the novel entrenched in the unique, disquieting and mad style he cultivated in his other works. The last few chapters in particklar are stunners.
Not quite 4 stars, but I rounded up out of a New Year's spirit of generosity. Marked down due to some typos & stylistic tics (e.g.,using himself and themselves in place of him and them), as well as some hard-to-believe plot developments(unbelievable in terms of a novel that deliberately blurs the genres of Gothic, fantasy, science-fiction, historical, mystery, philosophical & psychological fiction). The book's tiny but thick format makes it a bit hard to hold but also accelerates the reading process, so that 582 pages speed by like 300. According to a book jacket blurb, Antonello's Lion is about "the failure of Humanism in the West." Hmmm. It's also about failed fathers or failed fathering, which perhaps amounts to the same thing. The novel encompasses two parallel narratives, two quests: the first takes place in 1962-64 and involves Solomon Briggs, his obsession with the paintings of Antonello da Messina & his search for an imagined "lost" portrait of St. Francis, which will provide proof once and for all of both the painter's genius & Solomon's own belief that da Messina's paintings show the way to a secular spirituality. Solomon leaves his newly-pregnant lover, the obsessed-with-red painter Isabel, in Venice to travel to Sicily & the southern tip of Italy on what turns into an improbable journey with a macabre ending. Almost forty years later, in 2001, Solomon & Isabel's son Nathan decides, while in Venice with his fiancee Miriam, to confront his mother (now the militant feminist performance artist Brightwatch) in order to glean whatever clues he can about his father's pre-natal disappearance. Nathan then sets off on a quest to find this lost father that mirrors Solomon's journey several decades earlier. The son follows in the father's footsteps, both literally & figuratively. Nathan's narrative has its own weird fantasy/ Sci-Fi touches: e.g., his friends Max & Holly with their virtual-reality kingdom in Colorado, their residence/ motel built in the style of a Travelodge, which features Max's most recent product development: "dildonics." Near the end, Nathan's quasi-icky attraction to Max & Holly's 10-year-old daughter Tanya almost threw a wrench in the works for me, but I decided to let it pass, as the novel doesn't quite go THERE. Katz doesn't try to make his characters either believable or empathetic. When he writes, "Nathan couldn't deal with his vulnerability to the pssst," he might just as well be describing his own authorial vulnerability to his characters' flaws & sometimes downright awfulness.