Some of these agreements contradict each other; you can’t take anything someone says personally, but you need to trust yourself in deciphering whether a person is lying to you/themselves or not. Yet, in the 3rd agreement, it says that you must not make assumptions, and in order to do this you need to ask questions in order to obtain the truth. How do you decide whether the information someone says is truth or not? Unless everyone acts in this manner, the way in which you go about making no assumptions can still cause miscommunication regardless of how hard you work.
Also, by not taking anything personally, am I supposed to not feel anything when someone i care about talks to me? Should they not care when i say things to them? I understand that these agreements are important in the grand scheme of things, but I feel that in many specific situations, it would not work. As someone whose love language is primarily ‘words of affirmation,’ I wonder if I somehow need to change myself in order to become the ‘white magician’ this books claims is the purest form (I won’t get into the way this is very ignorant phrasing)
What is ‘doing my best’? Is it just what makes me feel good? There’s a lack of an explanation here, and I’ve always struggled with determining whether I’ve done my best in a situation or not.
‘It’s so simple and logical that even a child can understand them’ well thanks for that.
Overall, I do think this is a must-read for everyone, this book is so eye-opening to many aspects of life we never even think about. HOWEVER there is a fair bit I disagree with, or that I feel doesn’t make sense. But it could be that I just need context from other DMR books.