AN EXTENSION OF THE AUTHOR’S VIDEO SERIES
Author Aron Ra wrote in the Preface to this 2016 book, “I’ve always been an irreverent sort of person, with a preference for science over superstition, and ever since I first connected to the Internet, I’ve spent an unhealthy amount of my time obsessing over the topic of origins, particularly as relates to the evolution-creationism debate… The Usenet group Talk.Origins … [gave] me an opportunity to listen to the best arguments on both sides of the debate… How do I reach people?... I needed to teach people directly… But faith-based psycho-babble is shared for free everywhere by people who don’t know what they’re talking about… The only way I could see to counter that was to make a presentation suitable for those with minimal education and a short attention span… So I made a series of videos addressing each of these foundational falsehoods of creationism… That series was very popular. It changed my life, and I have hundreds of emails in my inbox from others who say that it changed their lives too. Finally, I met a book publisher … [who] wanted me to convert these videos to text… but also to ‘flesh out’ the arguments and evidence and references that I had to flash so fast before… This book is the fulfillment of that request.”
He points out about supposed “parallels” between Jesus and pagan gods, “it is important to note that while there definitely are many valid claims of strong parallels between different religious characters, not all such claims have been adequately researched or verified before publication, and many can’t be sourced. Some are based on earlier speculations that in turn are based on documents or cultural artifacts that have either been lost of misinterpreted---or that never existed to begin with… I was able to verify very few of the many claims made about the assemblage of myths that culminated in the character of Jesus the Christ… Some of my associates have independently arrived at the same conclusion.” (Pg. 72-73)
He recalls, “I never declared myself to be Mormon like my mother and grandmother had. I couldn’t do that because I didn’t know the scope of that Mormons believed. I hadn’t studied it, so how could I say whether I believed everything they do?... If I hadn’t been raised by a Mormon living in a non-Mormon culture, I might have missed out on an important lesson regarding religious prejudice. What I learned is that if you want to know what a Mormon believes, ask a Mormon; don’t ask a Baptist…” (Pg. 80-81)
He states, “The first insurmountable problem I had with the Bible was that every part of it was so weirdly illogical and grotesquely immoral that it was obviously not inspired by any superior being. The Bible is written remarkably badly… what I found… were only the insane ravings of superstitious primitives apparently trying to justify their own inhuman atrocities by pretending to speak for their god… The Bible is a deeply repugnant tome that celebrates evil, promotes ignorance, and punishes wisdom as an abominable sin. No deity worthy of worship would want to be associated with that despicable compilation… I eventually threw the book across the room in disgust.” (Pg. 84)
He continues, “So I believed in God, but I still had to reject the Bible at least on principle, if not on fact as well, because my presupposition that God is real left only two options: either God is good, and the Bible is completely wrong about him, or if the Bible is true, then God is neither holy, nor just, nor wise, nor loving, nor forgiving, nor anything else that could be considered ‘good.’ … So I said a prayer. I’ve only done that a handful of times in my life, but this was important. I said it alone in the privacy of my room, just like the Bible says in Matthew 6:5-6… In my prayer, I challenged God, demanding that he either provide some explanation to justify all the heinous atrocities and horrible judgements attributed to him in the Bible, or he should distance himself from all of that by showing me that the Bible does not speak for him. I even gave an ultimatum---that if he did not answer my prayer, then he could not have my soul… In some sense, I can honestly say that prayer was answered. Over the course of my life, it seems that practically every subject of study eventually implies that… the Bible is wrong, and it’s wrong about everything.” (Pg. 85)
He observes, “The problem creationists have with evolution is not that it challenges belief in God, because it doesn’t. Their problem is that evolution, like every other field of science, eventually inevitably challenges the accuracy and authority of the storybooks that creationists equate TO God. Creationism is a defense of MYTHology, not THEOlogy. Consequently, creationists tend to reject science almost entirely, and will often take aspects of all the various fields of study they perceive as threatening and lump them all together under one heading, which they then refer to as ‘evolutionism.’ It’s an attempt to minimize the sheer volume of sciences allied against them.” (Pg. 171)
He points out, “Throughout my youth, whenever I was challenged to defend my ‘belief’ in evolution, I had to admit that we didn’t have fish with feet---until they finally found it in 1987… they’ve actually found a whole sequence of them, from fish with lobe-fins or legs without feet to fish with partially developed fingers in their fins, and on into fish that could actually crawl on still-developing legs… it turns out that fish were already walking before they left the water… Our Darwin fish was found in the final stage of [the late Devonian period], right where it was supposed to be.” (Pg. 251)
On the distinction between “microevolution” and “macroevolution,” he comments, “The only reason creationists cling to these micro and macro distinctions is so they can have some excuse to accept ‘small-scale’ evolution (which they begrudgingly admit cannot be denied even with the greatest faith), while still denying ‘large-scale’ evolution, where their exact parameter of how large must remain elusive to prevent it every being disproved. Of course that means ‘large-scale’ evolution can mean whatever they want it to at any given moment.” (Pg. 317)
He recounts, “some people in my area held a seminar of sorts to discuss the film [Expelled]… The last panelist was Frank Sherwin, who was then referred to as the bulldog of the Institute of Creation Research… I was just getting involved enough that I began to consider myself an activist… My then fourteen-year-old son Connor, was one of my worst critics back then. So I took him with me, just so that he could see that this controversial conflict was all about… Connor looked around to notice a full audience of naïve patrons eagerly swallowing it all up… At the end of the presentation… I wanted to confront Sherwin, but … I was immediately surrounded by a crowd of emotionally charged believers… Connor was small enough then that he managed to slip through the crowd… I could see him clearly berating Sherwin… Moments later, Sherwin was gone… my son’s crowd gave me the report: the boy bluntly and fearlessly accused Sherwin of lying on a series of listed points…. They said he had Sherwin visibly sweating and confused until he literally fled the room!” (Pg. 342-343)
He notes, “Albert Einstein is typically seen as representative of scientific genius, so he is the one most often misquoted by the religious in their attempt to appear scientific… It doesn’t matter whether Einstein believed in the Jewish god, or that he actually believed in some other natural motion that he just liked to refer to as God. In any case, regardless of whatever respect he may have for the modern practice of religious culture and tradition, he still gave no credence to the fables in the Bible, and that’s all that might be relevant to me.” (Pg. 384)
This book will be of keen interest to those (mostly who are familiar with such discussions on the Internet) looking for critiques of Creationism.