Bennett, Alan. Keeping On Keeping On
How much is too much? This question inevitably arises in my mind after having ploughed through this, the third volume of Bennett’s memoirs - and I came up smiling. What is it about this over-modest, unassuming writer that continues to interest me, even when he’s banging on about the injustices of private education, the cruelties of Mrs Thatcher and the creeping erosion of the NHS? Well, I lapped up every word - almost, drawing the line at the playscripts packing out of an already profuse tale of the rise and rise of the boy from a Leeds ‘Modern’ school to a radio and TV personality in much demand for appearances, comment and, hopefully, more plays in the vogue of the ‘Talking Heads’ series.
Well, Bennett is unique in telling us how he finds us - and by ‘us’ he means we hypocitical English, although surely his own identity is basically, in this order, English, Northern and Working Class - with all their ‘hypocrisies.’ Basically one of his own ‘History Boys,’ Bennett seems baffled by his own ‘success,’ both as an entertainer and as a moral crusader, but the common man has adopted him in both roles, and he seems to speak for justice, or ‘fairness’ as he prefers to put it, for something good that is in the heart of man, for ordinariness with no fancy names or modish intellectual tags. He loves churches, rurality and picnics with a cup a hot tea in the flask and a bun, and then he’ll sit down in the hay and reminisce - and reminisce.
He detests commerce, especially public commercialisation of standard rights, such as the right of entry to public buildings, mainly National Trust properties and libraries, which should he says be funded by central government rather than being put out to hire to make a handsome profit for private companies. Is he behind the times - or is he one jump ahead? Bennett scourges the notorious criminals, and gives the politicians plenty of stick: - hence Margaret Thatcher, demonised as ‘evil’ throughout, although she was so loved by the electorate (How could we sheep-like, stupid voters have been so blind, for so many years?), Beeching who stole the common man’s right to relaxed travel and, traitor to the cause he espoused, Tony Blair.
Bennett is more interesting when he confesses his own prejudices - I mean beyond the flask and sandwiches or the solitary bike ride to an old church to inspect a rood loft - such as his constant exposure of police corruption, citing the Economist which maintains that ‘in the last ten years there have been more than four hundred deaths in police custody, with no convictions for murder or manslaughter.’ It’s probably true - the Economist is not renowned for sensationalism - but what else would one expect? Why not take a look at the USA or the Philippines and compare; or even take a peek at South America! That’s no excuse? Like private education, he finds police cover-ups inexcusable. Well, let’s admit that the UK justice system is far from being perfect, but it is nevertheless highly respected world-wide. Don’t kick your own country that loves you!
On cultural matters Bennett is at times less secure. Although he admires Turner, Bennett finds his much-admired later work being, as he puts it, over-dramatic, the sea setting subordinated ‘to some vast meteotrological drama or a battle between darkness and light which reduces the ostensible subject to a corner of the canvas.’ Even Mozart gets short stick and the finest poet writing in English in the Twentieth Century, TS Eliot is reduced to a mere footnote. As a professional critic Bennett is somewhat limited by his long raincoat and his national health spectacles from which he can never, apparently, be parted.