The book, “Pictures In The Dark”, by Gillian Cross at first was good but then went off to be confusing. What mainly happened was there's this boy named Charlie and he takes photography class, which is lowkey his thing. And Charlie took a weird photo before going to class, which was a photo of a black and orange image that wasn’t descriptive. He showed his photography class and Mr. Feinstein, his photography teacher, was complexed by the image that was shown. He wasn’t sure what it was and tried to make up different ideas for its appearance, but then Charlie ended it by saying it was “art”. Then there was this girl named Jennifer and Charlie found her extremely questionable because she didn’t talk as much and just did her own thing, which is completely normal to me. And half of the time when Charlie asked her questions, tried making jokes, she just blankly stared at him, and moved on. Then here’s the good part, the part where Charlie meets her brother named Peter. I feel bad for Peter most of the time because he always gets bullied for absolutely no reason. Everyone calls him weird and the reason for this was because he was supposedly called, “Evil Eye”, meaning his eyes were weird and gave a bad sign. For example, every time Charlie tried to talk to Peter or just did something that had to do with his photography something bad would happen, not to Peter, but to anyone he encountered. Scary right? But something that really made me have suspicions was the fact every time Charlie interfered with anything that had to do with the “otter”, his photograph he first found in the river that soon was going to be for his project, Peter was always there. And this was mainly because later in the book, Peter had a relationship with otters because it fitted his personality and it was just the way he acted. And because of this many people, even Charlie at first, which I founded annyong at first, always found him weird, when Peter was just doing his own thing. Zoe and Charlie's other friends were encouraging it as well, which pissed me off because he was a kid, he was about 11 or 12 years old. Towards the end, Charlie starts to know the truth of what happened with Peter and the real reason for his actions, as well as others, and because of this Peter then starts to feel affection and gratitude for that. However, Zoe and her other friend got a hold of Peter and because of the accusations they were wanting to murder him, which confuses me, and although this book is very old and may have some of that old writing, that was a huge jump for me. Like from things being well to now 2 kids wanting to basically murder a kid, I was like wow. Peter almost died by drowning but eventually got saved by Charlie and other people, which included his dad, the Liberian, etc. Charlie then eventually finished his project, turned it in to Mr. Feinstein, and just talked about how they could visit the river one day together. Overall this fiction book was ok, and I know that the author had made tons of other books but I don't think I would ever read them. I would recommend this book to people who like to read old books from the 1900”s, or just fiction. But for me, this book was a 3 out of 5.