The title is interesting because Buddy Foster apparently felt like the "foster child" in a female-dominated family (Jodie, his mother, Aunt Jo, Connie, etc.). Jodie Foster is known for her privacy so her brother's revelations must have felt like a stab in the back. Conscious of how she would react negatively to his book, Buddy emphasizes that he isn't going to drag his sister through the mud or make her look bad. He strikes a conciliatory tone throughout and constantly reminds us that Jodie was exceptional, a genius, and destined to succeed because of her extreme self-confidence and high IQ.
Still, Buddy reveals more of himself than he realizes in authoring her "biography." For one thing, there is an undertone of jealousy and sibling rivalry throughout the book. Compared to his sister's success, Buddy is a has-been, a forgotten ex-TV star, and he subtly suggests that Jodie stole the spotlight from him on two occasions, albeit unintentionally. His lead role in Carny was taken away once Jodie was cast as the director felt brother and sister couldn't act together as lovers (eww!), a crushing disappointment that led to his carelessness in getting hurt in a motorcycle accident. Whereas Jodie is depicted as smart, determined and coming through even the most trying predicaments (i.e., the Hinckley case and President Reagan's attempted assassination) smelling like a rose, Buddy is the overly sensitive brother who can't seem to do anything right and blames the lack of a strong family unit for his fragility.
It's hard not to feel a little sorry for Buddy. It's clear that their mother was controlling and held negative views toward men, which led her to favor Jodie's career over his. Buddy needed a strong father figure and never got it, which left him stumbling about and confused. He suggests that Jodie was affected by her mother's anti-male views. Add in Jodie's experience with stalkers like Hinckley and it's clear why her most serious relationships were with women.
At the same time, Buddy is patronizing and often writes about Jodie in a third person, omniscient point of view, as if she was a fictional character of whom he, the author, had exclusive privilege to her thoughts and feelings. I felt this was offensive because of his presumption that he knew exactly what went on inside her head when it's clear he knows as little about her present life as one of her shadowy "fans."
The book was written in 1996 so it's not a definitive biography but it's clear Buddy wrote this to shore up his finances and, like any hanger-on, highlight his connection to a famous woman. Though it's not as exploitative as it could have been, his protestations that he was simply setting "the record straight" by writing this book feels false and dishonest. Jodie has given interviews about the Hinckley affair and there was never a mudslinging campaign against her. She has a pretty solid, positive reputation in Hollywood so there was never a need for a "savior" like Buddy.
Trading on the public's desire to know "the read Jodie", I admit I succumbed to that curiosity. What I learned is that, while whip-smart, she can be chilly, calculating and not good at showing a vulnerable side. Buddy suggests that she is more cerebral than warm, a quality that led one director to reject her initially for a role.
The cover for my edition of the book shows a wary, unsmiling Jodie while Buddy's photo is even worse: sad-eyed, almost on the edge of tears as if he was ruminating on a life almost ruined by drug addiction. It's as if he's saying, 'feel sorry for me, I need the money!' as I read the book.