Design Thinking: Process and Methods

by Robert Curedale

Third Edition of the world's most popular guide to Design Thinking Process and Methods now expanded to 716 pages. The most detailed Design Thinking guide available Written by one of the most internationally experienced designers in the world. Used as a text in leading design schools including Parson Graduate Program in New York and University of California. Expanded content & case studies Expanded more detailed descriptions of process and methods. Process & 150 step by step methods described Templates & teaching exercises Glossary

Genres: Design

690 pages, Paperback

Published August 21, 2016

Reviews

[Carl · Rating 3 out of 5]

Robert Curedale has written this tome of design thinking, and while it's packed with goodies, it is maybe packed with too much. You get the impression that design thinking is actually all kinds of thinking. While this might be very true, that design thinking, today encompasses a lot, and has taken methodology from sociology, to engineering, to marketing, to philosophy, it is still lacking. As someone who studies and has worked with design and innovation, I find that massive areas have been omitted. Actor Network theory, socio-technical analysis and likewise get very little attention, which is odd, because most other alternative ways of thinking are included, even a mention could have been helpful. And that is where it fails, because it attempts to circumvent the entire genre but in doing so realizes how challenging that in fact is.

Though it is packed with plentiful of methods and processes, and many are probably useful, it may be hard for someone with little experience in design thinking to be able to operationalize anything, but if for the novice who has some experience, they will hopefully be able to recognize some of their own methods and processes, but also find inspiration in new areas which they have not experienced.

I do like many of the industries examples that Curedale has found, but occasionally felt that he was propping up his argument, primarily on quotes from famous people. Is Curedale attempting to launch himself into a job at IDEO? It feels like every section has at least one quote from top tier design management from IDEO. While they are great and have done tremendous amounts of good work for the world, and for design thinking in general, there is a lot of research that is less trendy but still could have been included. And yes Stanford d.school are also at the pinnacle of the research area, but again, Curedale, your book should not be an almost dedication to get that senior research position at Stanford. I might be too harsh, but it jarred my eyes a lot.

Curedales book is almost too packed and too selective in what he thinks design thinking is, which is odd because it's so dense and heavy and at the same time lacks both depth and breadth. I wouldn't attempt to write something like this, so kudos for training.

[Cathryn · Rating 3 out of 5]

Really not a lot more than a series of lists. I find this a good resource at the early stage of planning a workshop to think about what tools I might not have used for a while which might be better than the ones I've got used to using.