I could tell just from the introduction that this book was going to be extremely difficult to review. When the writer of the forward says “one must surrender to this story while not being too easily offended or outraged,” I immediately had alarm bells ringing in my head. I knew from the synopsis that this book was going to have a strong focus on the erotic, and I tried to go into this story with an open mind, but I still have mixed feelings.
I guess I was thinking this story would be similar to, say, One Hundred Years of Solitude which explores themes of longing, eroticism and even the taboo in Caribbean literature. Like that one, this story is a beautifully written work of magical realism, so you can never be sure what is real, what is just a story, and what is something in between. I think the synopsis offered by both the marketing of this book and the forward are intentionally vague because the unfolding of the story is really meant to be experienced, but there are some things in this book that would be extremely triggering to victims of sexual assault, and I also think it will be easier to explain my own unease if I just explain what happens:
*trigger warnings for sexual assault from here on out*
The story begins with our protagonist, Patrick, witnessing an event which is later spun into a fantastic tale, and we are introduced to the melding of story and reality until memory becomes something in between. Patrick sees his godmother being driven through town wearing a strange butterfly mask. He follows the car through the streets all the way to the gates of her home and only later finds out that she had been dead the whole time. From this, one of his friends spins a tale about a man who was caught in bed with a sorcerer's wife. The sorcerer curses the man by turning him into a giant butterfly who is insatiably lustful, but who is only attracted to virgins and widows. The butterfly then spends his nights r*ping young girls while they sleep, and sometimes both the young girls and their widowed mothers in one night.
Here, the story takes its time to describe, in detail, the fantastic and erotic dreams the girls and women have while they are being r*ped, being sure to let us know that although they would “awaken dismayed, with blood everywhere, brutally deflowered” the dreams were extremely pleasurable and they low-key liked it (and here is my first point of contention with books about female sexuality and pleasure written by a man, and one which treats consensual sex and r*pe the same, as if they are both part of the “erotic”). The butterfly continues to terrorize the town until he finds an insatiable widow with 7 vaginas (the now-dead godmother) with whom he stays for the rest of her life. After her death, the butterfly covers her eyes so he can lead her across the bay that separates the world from heaven.
It is reinforced later that this is just a story made up by a horny teenage boy, but it quickly spreads and enters the town’s collective imagination and has a big impact on the story. It is just super uncomfortable to read, and not, I think, in the way the author intended. It is shocking, but not because of its sexual nature- because of the casualness with which the subject is handled. Like...I get it, the butterfly is a metaphor for colonialism, but I just hate that the author feels entitled to use women’s bodies to make a point like this. This is a perfect example of why, though, this book is so hard to talk about. Because this is just a story-within-the-story, the effect is in a way more important than the narrative itself. But because the story, especially the r*pe parts, are described in such detail, it makes it very distracting and uncomfortable to read- but the discomfort may be intentional? It is also impossible for me, who is not Haitian, to say how much of this particular flavor of eroticism is perhaps just a cultural thing that I do not understand, and it's further not my place to tell colonized people how to discuss colonialism, but I could have done without the r*pe is all I’m saying.
Just a few days after the death of Patrick’s godmother, Hadriana dies on her wedding day- literally drops dead as she says “I do.” Due to the mysterious circumstances and the timing, many of the superstitious townspeople believe that the butterfly killed her so that he could r*pe her during her crossing of the bay (her fiancé had been diligent about protecting her “virtue,” which made it impossible for the butterfly to do this while she was alive). To protect her during her final passage, the local priestess says that Hadrianna’s body must undergo a “sacred deflowering” so that the butterfly can’t take her virginity. This causes a bit of a rift between the French Catholic traditions and indigenous vodou practices which are both important to the people of the town. People who never knew Hadriana are now literally arguing over her body and acting as if her virginity was a public commodity. There’s also a lot in here about Hadriana dying at “the height of her physical glory” and that her beauty would start to fade as soon as she got married despite the fact that she was only 19. Again, I get it- Hadriana is a metaphor for Haiti- but within the context of the story she’s also a literal person.
This seems too pointed to not be intentional, but again, it is difficult to say. At this point, we know absolutely nothing about Hadriana except that she was beautiful since we only ever see her through the eyes of Patrick, who sees her as an idealized, otherworldly creature. Plus, this story is narrated by a future Patrick, who is remembering these events from far away, and there are now layers of stories and false memories laid over the “real” ones, which further obscure Hadriana as a real person and render her nothing more than a body or a creature in a boy’s story (or an extremely obvious metaphor for Haiti itself).
On the day after her burial, Hadriana’s grave is dug up and her body goes missing, never to be seen again. In the decades that follow, her story fades into myth and the town itself begins to diminish. During this time, Patrick travels the world but can’t stop thinking about Hadriana and the nature of zombies in Haitian culture. Again, it seems like Hadriana’s literal body is being used, both by the characters in the story and by the author himself, as a metaphor for the post-colonial economic decline of Haiti.
After this, the story sort of becomes a non-fiction book as we read Patrick’s essay on the unique nature of zombies in Caribbean culture, and how they have changed following colonization. This part was actually very interesting, but I thought it was strange that everything kept coming back to Hadriana. I was distracted by how objectifying it all was, and I kept wishing the author could make these interesting points without using a young girl's body. I kept trying to give this book the benefit of the doubt and think that this was intentional commentary, but then Patrick started teaching college courses on Caribbean literature and we got lines like this, describing his female students: “they crossed their legs high on the thigh, exposing themselves to the yearnings of my frustrated single man’s lust with their fleshy curves ready for the most delightful plowing” and I was right back to thinking it was just misogyny.
Again, it is not the sex or eroticism that makes me uncomfortable, it the author’s treatment of women like they are metaphors in the male protagonist’s life and culture rather than real people (also how creepy is the word “fleshy” when used by a male author discussing attractive women?)
It is not until the last third of the book that we get to hear anything from Hadriana herself. This section, which is less than a third of the book, is amazing. Seeing the same events described from Hadriana’s perspective is not just less uncomfortable and misogynistic, it is also just more interesting. As Hadriana “dies” and comes back as a zombie, we see her drift through life and death as if they were waking and sleeping and it is super dreamy and strange. There’s also just great commentary about how, to Hadriana, Haiti is exemplified in the gorgeous gardens of her childhood mansion. She beautifully describes the plants from all over the Caribbean, but at the same time, clearly did not understand the colonialist implications of her, a white person, living in a mansion with indigenous servants (whom her mother called “their indigenous family”).
This, I thought, was social commentary I could really get in on because it wasn’t using someone else’s body to do it. As great as this section was, though, it was also kind of frustrating, because it shows that the author was capable of writing a very different, female-centered story that wasn't told from the perspective of a horny teenage boy who turned into a gross, horny man who harrassed his students, but chose not to. I understand splitting the story in two, with roughly one half being told from Patrick, a black indigenous boy’s, perspective, and the other from Hadriana, a white French girl’s, perspective. But I just really didn’t like how Patrick thought about women so I hated being in his head. As it turns out, Hadriana is bisexual (this is one of many things we learn about her when she is finally able to speak for herself- like I did not even realize she was blonde until she described herself) and I just think I would have liked the story so much more if the other half had been told by her girlfriend/ best friend Lolita (though I’m not sure if she was also white because she was only in one scene and Hadriana was focused on describing other things about her *wiggles eyebrows*).
The idea of using zombies as a metaphor for post-colonial societies, especially within a Caribbean culture in which vodou and zombies were such a large part of the culture prior to its forced conversion to Christianity, is the most interesting and thought-provoking stance on zombies I have ever read, especially when compared to the dime-a-dozen “zombies are a metaphor for consumerism and group-think you sheeple” hot takes I’m used to seeing. It's just that anytime a woman’s body becomes a metaphor, I just can’t help but think it’s a little galaxy-brained. BUT the writing is beautiful, and it is very thought-provoking- hence the mixed feelings.