Once you get over the elitism in this book, there are some valuable questions to ask. What is freedom? Is freedom the ability to choose your own doctor or health insurance plan? Or is freedom having health insurance so you do not have worry about going to back to school, quiting a job you hate, and so on? Is freedom coming out of school so debt laden that your choices of employment are effectively limited to who pays the most? Or, do not even make the choice because your employment goal no longer meets the cost benefit analysis equation of debt?
It's an interesting question. We liberals have tended to let the conservative agenda have the freedom debate all to themselves. "Yes, we are taking your freedom," we say, "But we are giving you healthcare." Untrue, we are giving you freedom so that you are no longer living in fear of losing your job and your health care. Health related costs accounted for nearly 50% of bankruptcies according to recent data (MSNBC). The economically conservative, Economist magazine, recently said that funing health care as we do now hurts innovation and the ability of people to move to jobs that best meet their potential. Why, you can't go from a job with health care to one without. You can't better yourself through law school or medical school if at the same time you are worried about getting sick.
In Making America Competitive, the authors suggest that having benefits tied to work is no longer viable in the new economy when people change jobs often.
So the question is, are you free when your choices are decided by debt, healthcare, etc? Or, are you free when you can make decisions that maximize your potential without having to worry so much about the monetary risks? What's better for society?