19TH Akshauhini, Algorithm of the Gita Stirring the Hornets’ Nest
I was taken in by the attractive cover page and the blurb of the book & decided to buy the book. I found Ito interesting especially the stories given to justify Authors view point and the very good illustrations. It is a nice read in the category of MYTHOLOGY or FICTION. It does not qualify for category Religion or Philosophy or Spirituality as has been claimed. I will list out my observations both positive and negative.
Very Interesting stories, some of them are rare and being heard for the first time. Illustrations are very good and make the book interesting. Illustrations cater to the children. The Use of Legal concepts, Computer jargon, Management principles, mathematics angle, scientific tools, etc for mining new perspectives on Gita are original and acceptable to all and the efforts are worth appreciating.
On the flip side, The Author has stirred a hornets’ nest. His theories are flights of fantasy and bear no likeness or resemblance to the teachings of any Acharyas’ of any school of thought. He assumes that he is more knowledgeable than the acharyas of any sampradaya be it vaishnavite or a saivite or any other sampradaya. That is the reason it cannot be termed Religious or Philosophical or spiritual. The Author claims that those are God’s words but in fact it is author’s words as the authors words contrast and contradict every acharya’s words. The Author appears to be megalomaniac and is attempting to subrogate to himself and style himself Guardian or keeper of God’s words. As per the bio-data of the author, He has no formal qualifications in respect of Hindu studies like the great seers and Acharyas have and makes him unfit to comment on Gita. The Author has taken the services of the firm 3ADE for translating from English to Sanskrit, revealing that he does not even have elementary knowledge of Sanskrit so as to read the original version and make comments. It is like a student reading guide or 40 questions on law and writing commentaries on Legal issues. A good book for light reading but not for believing the concepts and philosophy enunciated therein.