Brian Cox and Jeff Forshaw’s Universal sets out to demystify the cosmos, blending science, history, and storytelling to explain the universe’s workings. While it’s an ambitious and often awe-inspiring effort, the book’s approach may not suit every reader.
The book shines when it delves into the wonders of the universe. Cox and Forshaw’s enthusiasm for stars, galaxies, and black holes is infectious, and these sections are genuinely captivating. Their ability to intertwine scientific discovery with historical context adds depth and a human element to what might otherwise feel abstract. For moments, it captures the magic of Carl Sagan’s Cosmos with its vivid explanations and sheer sense of scale.
Where Universal falters is in its reliance on mathematical detail. Despite efforts to simplify, concepts like trigonometry and relativity are often presented in ways that assume a stronger mathematical foundation than the average reader might have. As someone with an interest in science but limited comfort with advanced maths, I found these sections difficult to engage with, which slowed the book’s overall pace.
This isn’t a book that humanises and simplifies every idea for broad accessibility. Instead, it straddles the line between popular science and a more academic text, occasionally leaning too heavily toward the latter.
For readers with a solid grasp of maths and a passion for exploring complex scientific concepts, Universal could be a rewarding read. However, if you’re hoping for an engaging, narrative-driven exploration of the cosmos akin to Sagan or Neil deGrasse Tyson, this book might prove challenging.
That said, Universal did succeed in sparking my curiosity about topics like relativity and the mechanics of the universe. While it wasn’t quite what I’d hoped for, it planted seeds for further exploration.