Koran und moderne Wissenschaft: Vereinbar oder Unvereinbar?

by Zakir Naik, Klaus Habib Neven (Translation)

Der Koran, die Hauptquelle des Islamischen Glaubens, ist ein Buch von, wie Muslime glauben, vollst�ndig g�ttlicher Herkunft. Muslime glauben auch, dass es eine Leitung f�r alle Menschen beinhaltet. Da gesagt wird, die Botschaft des Koran sei f�r alle Zeiten, sollte sie folglich f�r alle Zeitalter relevant sein. Besteht der Koran diesen Test?

Genres: Islam, Religion, Science, Nonfiction, Philosophy

86 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1977

About the author

Dr. Zakir Abdul Karim Naik is a renowned orator on Islam & comparative religion. He is the founder & president of the Islamic Research Foundation (IRF), a non-profit organisation that owns the Peace TV Network & the Islamic International School (IIS). Dr Zakir clarifies misconceptions about Islam, using the Qur’an, authentic Hadith & other Religious Scriptures, with reason, logic & scientific facts. He has Authored many Books on Islam & Comparative Religion.

Zakir Abdul Karim Naik was born on October 18th 1965 in Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. He attended St. Peter's High School & Kishinchand Chellaram College in Mumbai, before studying medicine at Topiwala National Medical College & Nair Hospital. Afterwards at the University of Mumbai he obtained a Bachelor of Medicine & Surgery (MBBS). In 1991 he started working in the field of Dawah, & founded IRF. Dr. Zakir says he was inspired by Sheikh Ahmed Deedat, the world famous Islamic scholar, having met him in 1987. Sheikh Deedat Gave Dr. Zakir the title of "Deedat Plus" for his excellence in Dawah.

Dr. Zakir's style of memorizing the Qur'an, Authentic Hadith & other Religious Scriptures in various languages, as well as his critical analysis & convincing answers to challenging questions, has made him extremely popular in Muslim & non-Muslim circles. In the last 20 years Dr Zakir Naik has delivered more than 2000 public talks all over the world, in addition to numerous in India.

He has participated in several debates & dialogues with prominent personalities of other faiths. His public dialogue with Dr. William Campbell on “The Qur’an & the Bible in the light of Science” held in Chicago, in April, 2000 was a huge success. His Interfaith Dialogue with Hindu Guru Sri Sri Ravi Shankar on "The Concept of God in Hinduism & Islam in the light of Sacred Scriptures" held in Bangalore, in Jan. 2006, was highly appreciated by people of both faiths.

According to Google, searches for Dr. Zakir Naik vary between 5 to 12 million daily which is one of the highest among'st Muslim religious speakers in the world. He is ranked #62 in the list of "500 Most Influential Muslims in the World" published by George Washington University in 2012. He was also listed #82 in the "100 Most Influential People in India" in 2009, & was listed #1 in the ‘Top 10 Spiritual Gurus of India in 2010 published by Indian Express.

Reviews

[Enas Ahmed · Rating 5 out of 5]

First of all , I'd like to thank the author cause the pdf I read was not copyright protected !
I would have felt guilty if I've read it as PDF while it's copyright protected
Many many thanks Sir

2nd : this is a small booklet , yet the pieces of information in it is enormous to comprehend in one setting ( I read it all at once ,However I'll gladly read it in another time to memorize it ! )

3rd : I wish I can find a translation to in in Arabic , cause it'll be very useful for our Arabic society , specially nowadays cause Atheism is growing in a wicked speed !

Many Many thanks for that enriched , useful , ingenious and rational booklet

[Hayel Barakat هايل بركات · Rating 3 out of 5]

The book is a small introductory on Quran and discoveries in modern science. This booklet by Dr. Maurice Bucaille has been in circulation for the past nineteen years and has been a very effective tool in presenting Islam to non-Muslims as well as introducing Muslims to aspects of the scientific miracle of the Qur’an. It is
based on a transcription of a lecture given by Dr. Bucaille in French.

[Riyan · Rating 5 out of 5]

well i think all my friends who belive and who dont belive in god must read this book ...

[Muhammad Nida · Rating 3 out of 5]

هذا الكتيب عبارة عن نص لمحاضرة ألقاها موريس بوكاي أمام معهد الكومنولث البريطاني في لندن لتكون هادياً للحق الذي جاء به الإسلام.

قرأت النص باللغتين العربية والإنجليزية لأجد المترجم قد أبدع أيَّما إبداع!
- أضاف بعض الفقرات في الترجمة ليست موجوة في النص الأصلي.
- بدَّل من ترتيب بعض الفقرات بين العناوين المختلفة، للحق لم تؤثر على المعنى.
- أضاف - بداخل النص وليس الهوامش - آيات وأحاديث اقتبس منها بوكاي بعض المعاني.
- an eighteen year old Muslim = شاب مسلم في الثانية عشرة من عمره!

أهم نقطتين تناولهما لا يتعلقان بالإعجاز العلمي في القرآن ولكن لأسس وقواعد.
* ففي النقطة الأولى منهما يحدد أسس البحث والتفسير لأوجه هذا الإعجاز حتى لا يصبح هذا المجال مرتع لكل أحد وللا أحد!؛ فيقول:

"لقد أصبح واجباً على من يتصدى للتفسير العلمي للقرآن أن يرجع إلى البحوث والدراسات المتخصصة، وأن يستند - على الأقل - إلى دائرة معارف متسعة، وأعني بالمعارف العلمية هنا: ما أصبح في حكم الحقائق المؤكدة التي لا خلاف عليها، فلا يدخل فيها ما لم يتحقق بعد من نظريات قد يضعها العلماء للتفسير المؤقت لظواهر محدودة، قبل أن تنقضها ظواهر أو مفاهيم جديدة."

* وفي النقطة الثانية يؤكد على أن القرآن كتاب هداية وليس كتاب علم؛ فيقول:

"ينبغي أن نؤكد أولاً أن القرآن الكريم - قبل كل شيء - كتاب هداية، لم ينزله الله مصدراً للمعارف العلمية، وإنما هو رسالة تستنهض العقل للتأمل في خلق الله، ونواميس الطبيعة ليتعرف من خلالها على جلال القدرة الإلهية. وفي خلال تدبر ذلك الكتاب يجد أولو العلم والبصيرة فيه من "الإشارات العلمية" المشرقة نفحات من الله - تعالى - تشد أزرهم في مواجهة دعاوي الإلحاد المادي المتهافتة، وإن تسربلت بعباءة العلم. والقرآن أيضاً هو البرهان الخالد، والمعجزة الشاهدة إلى آخر الزمان على صدق تنزيله من خالق الكون، سواء في إعجاز بيانه أو صدق معارفه، بما يقطع باستحالة صدوره من بشر."

سبتمبر 2012

[Riyan · Rating 5 out of 5]

well in this book quran has proved scientifically that there is a existence of god.. well i suggest my non belivers friend to sure read it ..

[Maria · Rating 4 out of 5]

An interesting book presenting how the holy quran illustrating the modern science.
The style of the book is very simple.
The writer gave detailed explanation of the quranic verses.

[Md Azmir Fakir · Rating 5 out of 5]

Indeed! The Qur'an is a book from the All Knowing God. The information contained therein are so perfect and sweet. No one can deny this book except the dumb' deaf and blind. Thank you Dr Zakir Naik for thus wonderful explanation. I will recommend this book to friends and family both muslims and non-muslims..Once again tgank you for a job well done.

[Suhana Saiyedya · Rating 5 out of 5]

The Qur'ân & Modern Science is a fascinating study in modern religious apologetics. For readers seeking to understand how contemporary Muslims reconcile ancient scripture with modern scientific progress, this book serves as an excellent primary source. While it may not convince skeptics who require empirical, peer-reviewed methodology rather than theological interpretation, it remains a highly influential and empowering text for its target audience.

[Hassan · Rating 2 out of 5]

This attempt at proving the veracity of the Quran, while it has some measure of success, is ultimately apparent to be an attempt to shoehorn textual interpretations into contemporary scientific discoveries.

I found the book to be superficial in it's interpretations of Quranic text that are largely materialistic while ignoring the symbolism and metaphysical interpretations to these verses.

I'm of the opinion that while the Quran is immutable, scientific discoveries change with the times. Therefore, tying certain verses to scientific beliefs of an era can be dangerous when those scientific discoveries change in the future.

[Ali · Rating 1 out of 5]

Bible is great book "Day-Age Genesis Interpretation"

(Day)

DAY 1

1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.

1:2 And the earth was formless and void, and darkness was over the surface of the deep; and the Spirit of God was moving over the surface of the waters.

Most people read the Genesis creation account without using the scientific method and, therefore, make assumptions that are not supported by the text. For example, the first rule of the scientific method is to establish the initial conditions, or the frame of reference. Genesis 1:2 clearly states that the frame of reference is "the surface of the waters" of the earth. Most people have made the mistake of assuming the frame of reference of Genesis 1 is heaven or somewhere above the earth.

What does the text specifically say? The heavens (universe, solar system, sun, earth, etc.) were already created before the first "day" (Genesis 1:1, ~14 x 109 years ago). Science tells us that the entire planet was covered in a global sea soon after its creation (3). In other verses, the Bible says that the earth is controlled by the heavens, refuting geocentrism (4). In Genesis 1:2, God was "hovering or brooding" over the seas of the newly formed earth (4.4-3.8 x 109 years ago, 5). We know from science this is where the first unicellular life forms first appeared (6). The Hebrew word, rachaph, translated as "hovering or brooding" is used only twice in the Old Testament. The second reference is to an eagle caring for its young (7). Therefore, it seems likely that the use of the word rachaph in Genesis 1:2 may be referring to God creating the first life forms in the sea.

DAY 1

1:3 Then God said, "Let there be light"; and there was light.

1:4 And God saw that the light was good; and God separated the light from the darkness.

1:5 And God called the light day, and the darkness He called night. And there was evening and there was morning, one day.

Both science and the Bible (8) have told us that at the earth's creation, it was covered with a dense layer of clouds and gases which would have made it dark at its surface. Genesis 1:2 says, "darkness was over the surface of the deep." Next, God removed much of the cloud cover, when He stated, "Let there be light" (Genesis 1:3) This was the light of the Sun (already created) which now "separated light from darkness" (Genesis 1:4). It is very clear from the text that the sun had already been created and the earth was rotating on its axis, since there was light (day) and darkness (night) (Genesis 1:5).

----------------------------------------------------------------------
DAY 2

1:6 Then God said, "Let there be an expanse in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters."
1:7 And God made the expanse, and separated the waters which were below the expanse from the waters which were above the expanse; and it was so.
1:8 And God called the expanse heaven. And there was evening and there was morning, a second day.
1:9 Then God said, "Let the waters below the heavens be gathered into one place, and let the dry land appear"; and it was so.
1:10 And God called the dry land earth, and the gathering of the waters He called seas; and God saw that it was good.

Genesis 1:6-10 describe the initiation of a stable water cycle (9) and formation of continents (10) through tectonic activity (~2.7 x 109 years ago) (11).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

DAY 3

1:11 Then God said, "Let the earth sprout vegetation, plants yielding seed, and fruit trees bearing fruit after their kind, with seed in them, on the earth"; and it was so.
1:12 And the earth brought forth vegetation, plants yielding seed after their kind, and trees bearing fruit, with seed in them, after their kind; and God saw that it was good.
1:13 And there was evening and there was morning, a third day.

Plant life was created on the third day (Genesis 1:11-13, ~1.0 x 109 years ago). These verses are probably the strongest argument for the day-age interpretation. The verse says quite clearly that the earth sprouted (or brought forth) vegetation and fruit trees bearing fruit. The English word translated "vegetation" on the third day comes from the Hebrew word deshe', which refers to small plants, such as grasses and herbs. The other word, ‛eśeb, translated "plants" is even more generic, referring to any kind of green plant. So, the "day" encompasses the time from the formation of the first plants until the formation of the angiosperms. The process described is clearly similar to what we see today. Fruit trees take years to bear fruit, testifying that the third "day" could not possibly be just 24 hours long, as claimed by young earth creationists. Recent scientific evidence shows that plant life began on the land ~1 billion years ago (12)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
DAY 4

1:14 Then God said, "Let there be lights in the expanse of the heavens to separate the day from the night, and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days and years;
1:15 and let them be for lights in the expanse of the heavens to give light on the earth ";and it was so.
1:16 And God made the two great lights, the greater light to govern the day, and the lesser light to govern the night; He made the stars also.
1:17 And God placed them in the expanse of the heavens to give light on the earth,
1:18 and to govern the day and the night, and to separate the light from the darkness; and God saw that it was good.
1:19 And there was evening and there was morning, a fourth day.

Next the translucent cloud layer was removed so that the sun, moon and stars shown through. Notice the unusual construction in Genesis 1:14 which states, "Then God said, 'Let there be lights in the expanse of the heavens to separate the day from the night, and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days and years;'" "Let there be" is an unusual way to describe de novo creation (see also verse 1:3). I believe that at this point God removed the translucent cloud cover from the planet to allow the stars, moon, and Sun to be seen from the surface of the earth (the frame of reference of all Genesis 1). The text then reiterates what God had already done in Genesis 1:1 regarding the creation of the sun, moon, and stars. The time frame describes events over days, seasons, and years - obviously more than 24 hours long.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DAY 5

1:20 Then God said, "Let the waters teem with swarms of living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth in the open expanse of the heavens."
1:21 And God created the great sea monsters, and every living creature that moves, with which the waters swarmed after their kind, and every winged bird after its kind; and God saw that it was good.
1:22 And God blessed them, saying, "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let birds multiply on the earth."
1:23 And there was evening and there was morning, a fifth day.

Birds (13) (~70 x 106 years ago), whales (14) (~50 x 106 years ago) and sea mammals ("swarms of living creatures," where "creatures" is the Hebrew word nephesh, referring to soulish animals - those that can form relationships with humans) were created on the "fifth" day (Genesis 1:20-21), which would correspond to the end of the Cretaceous period/beginning of the Tertiary.
The fifth day describes a period of time longer than 24 hours as swarms of living creatures are multiplying in the sea.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1:24 Then God said, "Let the earth bring forth living creatures after their kind: cattle and creeping things and beasts of the earth after their kind"; and it was so.


1:25 And God made the beasts of the earth after their kind, and the cattle after their kind, and everything that creeps on the ground after its kind; and God saw that it was good.

On the sixth day God created the "beasts of the earth" (in Genesis 1:25 the Hebrew word is chayyah, which is best translated as "wild animal," usually referring to carnivorous mammals (15) (the extinct families Miacidae and Viverravidae, appeared ~50 x 106 years ago or current families Canidae, Felidae, Mustelidae, and Viverridae appeared ~30 x 106 years ago ) and the cattle (the Hebrew word is behemah, from which we get the word behemoth, the artiodactyls (large grazing mammals) appeared ~15 x 106 years ago) and the rodents (mammals that "creep on the ground"). Therefore, the wild and domesticated mammals and rodents were created on the sixth day.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DAY 6

1:26 Then God said, "Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth."

1:27 And God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.

The last creation of God was mankind, who was also created at the end of the sixth day. What about humans and three million year old fossil remains of bipedal primates? I believe in a literal Adam and Eve, although I do not believe they lived millions of years ago. The Bible indicates that Adam and Eve had a relationship with God (Genesis 2-3) and the text says that unique among all the animals, humans are endowed with a spirit (Hebrew, ruach, Greek, pneuma), by which they are able to communicate with and love God. Scientists have found no evidence of religious artifacts before about 25,000 to 50,000 years ago (16), which is the point at which I propose God created Adam and Eve. The Bible states that the covenant and laws of God have been proclaimed to a "thousand generations" (17). A biblical generation, described as being 40 years, would represent at least 40,000 years of human existence. However, since the first dozen or more generations were nearly 1,000 years, this would make humans nearly 50,000 years old, which agrees very well with dates from paleontology and molecular biology (see Descent of Mankind Theory: Disproved by Molecular Biology). Therefore, I believe that bipedal primates that existed before Adam and Eve, were just part of the animal kingdom, and were not endowed with the characteristics that make humans distinct from animals.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Does Science Agree With the Bible?


The Bible’s answer

Yes, for although the Bible is not a science textbook, it is accurate when it mentions matters of science. Consider some examples showing that science and the Bible agree and that the Bible contains scientific facts that differed greatly from the beliefs of many people living at the time it was written.

The universe had a beginning. (Genesis 1:1) In contrast, many ancient myths describe the universe, not as being created, but as being organized from existing chaos. The Babylonians believed that the gods that gave birth to the universe came from two oceans. Other legends say that the universe came from a giant egg.

The universe is governed day-to-day by rational natural laws, not by the whims of deities. (Job 38:33; Jeremiah 33:25) Myths from around the world teach that humans are helpless before the unpredictable and sometimes merciless acts of the gods.

The earth is suspended in empty space. (Job 26:7) Many ancient peoples believed that the world was a flat disk supported by a giant or an animal, such as a buffalo or a turtle.

Rivers and springs are fed by water that has evaporated from the oceans and other sources and then has fallen back to earth as rain, snow, or hail. (Job 36:27, 28; Ecclesiastes 1:7; Isaiah 55:10; Amos 9:6) The ancient Greeks thought that rivers were fed by underground ocean water, and this idea persisted into the 18th century.

The mountains rise and fall, and today’s mountains were once under the ocean. (Psalm 104:6, 8) In contrast, several myths say that the mountains were created in their current form by the gods.

Sanitary practices protect health. The Law given to the nation of Israel included regulations for washing after touching a dead body, quarantining those with infectious disease, and disposing of human waste safely. (Leviticus 11:28; 13:1-5; Deuteronomy 23:13) By contrast, one of the Egyptian remedies in use when these commands were given called for applying to an open wound a mixture that included human excrement.

Are there scientific errors in the Bible?

A reasonable examination of the Bible shows the answer to be no. Here are some common misconceptions about the scientific accuracy of the Bible:

Myth: The Bible says that the universe was created in six 24-hour days.

Fact: According to the Bible, God created the universe in the indefinite past. (Genesis 1:1) Also, the days of creation described in chapter 1 of Genesis were epochs whose length is not specified. In fact, the entire period during which earth and heaven were made is also called a “day.”—Genesis 2:4.

Myth: The Bible says that vegetation was created before the sun existed to support photosynthesis.—Genesis 1:11, 16.

Fact: The Bible shows that the sun, one of the stars that make up “the heavens,” was created before vegetation. (Genesis 1:1) Diffused light from the sun reached the earth’s surface during the first “day,” or epoch, of creation. As the atmosphere cleared, by the third “day” of creation, the light was strong enough to support photosynthesis. (Genesis 1:3-5, 12, 13) Only later did the sun become distinctly visible from the surface of the earth.—Genesis 1:16.

Myth: The Bible says that the sun revolves around the earth.

Fact: Ecclesiastes 1:5 says: “The sun rises, and the sun sets; then it hurries back to the place where it rises again.” However, this statement merely describes the apparent motion of the sun as viewed from the earth. Even today, a person can use the words “sunrise” and “sunset,” yet he knows that the earth revolves around the sun.

Myth: The Bible says that the earth is flat.

Fact: The Bible uses the phrase “the ends of the earth” to mean “the most distant part of the earth”; this does not imply that the earth is flat or that it has an edge. (Acts 1:8; footnote) Likewise, the expression “the four corners of the earth” is a figure of speech referring to the entire surface of the earth; today a person might use the four points of the compass as a similar metaphor.—Isaiah 11:12; Luke 13:29.

Myth: The Bible says that the circumference of a circle is exactly three times its diameter, but the correct value is pi (π), or about 3.1416.

Fact: The measurements of “the Sea of cast metal” given at 1 Kings 7:23 and 2 Chronicles 4:2 indicate that it had a diameter of 10 cubits and that “it took a measuring line 30 cubits long to encircle it.” These dimensions might have been merely the nearest round numbers. It is also possible that the circumference and diameter represented inner and outer measurements of the basin respectively.

http://www.jw.org/en/bible-teachings/....

Fulfilled Prophecy
http://www.jw.org/en/publications/mag....

Big Bang—The Bible Taught It First!

Dr. Hugh Ross

While it is true that they were the first (1965) to detect the radiation left over from the creation event,1 they were not the first scientists to recognize that the universe expanded from an extremely hot and compact state. In 1946 George Gamow calculated that nothing less than the universe expanding from a near infinitely hot condition could account for the present abundance of elements.2 In 1929 observations made by Edwin Hubble established that the velocities of galaxies result from a general expansion of the universe.3 Beginning in 1925 Abbé Georges Lemaître, who was both an astrophysicist and a Jesuit priest, was the first scientist to promote a big bang creation event.4

The first direct scientific evidence for a big bang universe dates back to 1916. That is when Albert Einstein noted that his field equations of general relativity predicted an expanding universe.5 Unwilling to accept the cosmic beginning implied by such expansion, Einstein altered his theory to conform with the common wisdom of his day, namely an eternally existing universe.6

All these scientists, however, were upstaged by 2500 years and more by Job, Moses, David, Isaiah, Jeremiah, and other Bible authors. The Bible’s prophets and apostles stated explicitly and repeatedly the two most fundamental properties of the big bang, a transcendent cosmic beginning a finite time period ago and a universe undergoing a general, continual expansion. In Isaiah 42:5 both properties were declared, “This is what the Lord says—He who created the heavens and stretched them out.”

The Hebrew verb translated “created” in Isaiah 42:5 is bara’ which has as its primary definition “bringing into existence something new, something that did not exist before.”7 The proclamation that God created (bara’) the entirety of the heavens is stated seven times in the Old Testament. (Genesis 1:1; 2:3; 2:4; Psalm 148:5; Isaiah 40:26; 42:5; 45:18). This principle of transcendent creation is made more explicit by passages like Hebrews 11:3 which states that the universe that we humans can measure and detect was made out of that which we cannot measure or detect. Also, Isaiah 45:5-22; John 1:3; and Colossians 1:15-17 stipulate that God alone is the agent for the universe’s existence. Biblical claims that God predated the universe and was actively involved in causing certain effects before the existence of the universe is not only found in Colossians 1 but also in Proverbs 8:22-31; John 17:24; Ephesians 1:4; 2 Timothy 1:9; Titus 1:2; and 1 Peter 1:20.

The characteristic of the universe stated more frequently than any other in the Bible is its being “stretched out.” Five different Bible authors pen such a statement in eleven different verses: Job 9:8; Psalm 104:2; Isaiah 40:22; 42:5; 44:24; 45:12; 48:13; 51:13; Jeremiah 10:12; 51:15; and Zechariah 12:1. Job 37:18 appears to be a twelfth verse. However, the word used for “heavens” or “skies” is shehaqîm which refers to the clouds of fine particles (of water or dust) that are located in Earth’s atmosphere,8 not the shamayim, the heavens of the astronomical universe.9 Three of the eleven verses, Job 9:8; Isaiah 44:24; and 45:12 make the point that God alone was responsible for the cosmic stretching.

What is particularly interesting about the eleven verses is that different Hebrew verb forms are used to describe the cosmic stretching. Seven verses, Job 9:8; Psalm 104:2; Isaiah 40:22; 42:5; 44:24; 51:13; and Zechariah 12:1 employ the Qal active participle form of the verb natah. This form literally means “the stretcher out of them” (the heavens) and implies continual or ongoing stretching. Four verses, Isaiah 45:12; 48:13; and Jeremiah 10:12; 51:15 use the Qal perfect form. This form literally means that the stretching of the heavens was completed or finished some time ago.

That the Bible really does claim that the stretching out of the heavens is both “finished” and “ongoing” is made all the more evident in Isaiah 40:22. There we find two different verbs used in two different forms. In the first of the final two parallel poetic lines, “stretches out” is the verb natah in the Qal active participle form. In the second (final) line the verb “spreads them out” (NASB, NIV, NKJV) is mathah (used only this one time in the Old Testament) in the waw consecutive plus Qal imperfect form, so that literally we might translate it “and he has spread them out

[Chico · Rating 5 out of 5]

What a great book. One of my first reads right after reverting to Al-Islam!

[Ayesha · Rating 5 out of 5]

Knowledge of universe explained in few pages!
A must read!

[Marjan · Rating 3 out of 5]

Picked this book up at an Islamic fair, there are some pretty good arguments for a book written in 2007. Time for them to publish an updated edition.

[Ekmel · Rating 5 out of 5]

The Qur'an is not a book of Science but a book of 'signs'. These signs invite mankind to realise the purpose of their existence on earth, and to live in harmony with nature. It is essentially a book of guidance that guides mankind to the truth and to the Lord of the World's who alone deserves to be worshipped. The Qur'an is truly a message from Allah, the creator and sustainer of the universe. It contains the same message of the Oneness of Allah, that was preached by all prophets, right from Adam, all through Moses, Noah and Jesus to Muhammad (peace be upon all of them).

[Syedm · Rating 5 out of 5]

Its Amazing book like its Title, I pray to God Almighty, May God shower mercy on the Readers of this book and enlightened them with the TRUTH.

[Ria Bella · Rating 1 out of 5]

http://www.godandscience.org/apologet...

http://www.godandscience.org/apologet...

[Lejla · Rating 5 out of 5]

Kao što kažu, bitan je kvalitet, a ne kvantitet. Ovo je knjižica koja sadrži bitne stvari i ne dotiče se nevažnog. Fino upoređene činjenice sa naučnog aspekta i one sadržane u Kur'anu. Moglo bi se naći još dokaza, ali mislim da je pisac izabrao neke od važnijih.
Opsežnost knjige bi trebala da privuče i one manje sklone čitanju, jer knjiga nije debela i zaista se lahko i brzo čita, čak i kada se zastaje da se razmisli o činjenicama spomenutim u knjizi.
I da, ne moraš čak biti ni vjernik da bi ju čitao. :) Mislim da bi se mnogi zamislili nad ovom knjigom i da je zaista vrijedna čitanja...

[Sonja · Rating 3 out of 5]

3.5 out of 5 stars.

[Adam · Rating 5 out of 5]

This booklet is excellent, fast-paced read and an absolute masterpiece of the miracles of the Quran

[Tony Lee Ross Jr. · Rating 2 out of 5]

Dr. Zakir Naik seeks to use a concordist model to prove that the Qu'ran is in line with contemporary science.

[Afnan Aldimasi · Rating 1 out of 5]

I've been looking for a book related to this topic and I was optimistic when I had it in hand. Unfortunately, it did not meet my expectations and I'm afraid to say it wasn't of great value. Probably because it was published more than three decades ago. There must be a better version out there.

[Sharjeel · Rating 5 out of 5]

Simple understanding to know the signs of Allah, and this books gives a simplex view.

[Shakir · Rating 5 out of 5]

I was not a good muslim before I read this book and heard many lectures by Dr. Zakir Naik. Thanks a lot Doctor for showing and reminding me that I am so lucky to be born as a Muslim.

[Hesham N. Ali · Rating 4 out of 5]

insightful

[Khaled · Rating 1 out of 5]

لا يحتوي الكتاب إلا على الكثير من الأكاذيب التي تحاول اخضاع القرآن الكريم لمقياس العلم وليّ الكثير من النصوص القرآنية حتى تتماشى مع العلم

[Medusa_1997 · Rating 1 out of 5]

Not islamophobic, but kindly dont show religious & science as not contradicted.
Read the book and i swear never seen as superficial book as this. Thanks for being short book.

[Manal Osama · Rating 5 out of 5]

أُنزل القرآن آيات لأولى الألباب - العقول - لعلنا نتفكر ،، نعقل ،، نتفكر .

كل آيه فى القرآن ،، هى دعوة لليقين بالله بالآيات -البراهين - والحجج ،، أو قصص للموعظة من جهل السابقين واستكبارهم على الله فما لنا لا نتعظ ونقراءه قرآة السابقين

ربنا مش نزل القرآن عشان نقول حلال وحرام وهذا ما أنزل على أباءنا ،،، ولكن لنعقله بميزان العقل والعلم ونتخذ بالأسباب وحكمة الله فى خلقه وأوامره
لأنه كتاب لكل زمان ومكان فما لنا نقرآه قراءة الجاهلية ،، لنؤمن عن يقين

فى القرآن أوامر ونهى وهذا ما ننظر اليه ف الآيات ولكن أول الآيات كانت " اقرآ" وكل آيه أمر ب " التفكر"
ولكى نؤمن بالله لازم ندركه فى خلقه وآياته بالعلم وعندما ندرك الله نؤمن به ونجلّه فنطيعه



الكتاب دا مش بس بيعلمنا ما نجهله ولكن يجعلك جاهل فى قراءة وتدبر القرآن
آيات وآيات تمر علينا وقد نكون حافظين لها عن قلب ولكننا يوما لم نتدبر أو نتفكر فيها
تقف عند كل صفحة لأدرك اننى لم اقرأمنه الا قليلا ولم اتفكر ولو اتعقله يو
الكتاب دا دعوة للمسلمين للإسلام وللخضوع لله عن علم ويقين
لم اجد نسخ عربيه منه فكانت الانجليزية هيا السبيل
وفقط 4 لأنه انتهى سريعا ،،
كتاب يعطيك المصباح ثم يتركك لتستكشف الطريق وحدك ،،،

[Khadija Mahmood · Rating 3 out of 5]

i am keeping in consideration the fact that Dr Zakir Naik was banned from several countries.
the book itself does contain quite some good information about science, however i found that some were not accurate at all and with just a quick google search it could be proven false.

i did learn a lot of new information and i will credit the book for that.
He mentioned someone named Sir Francis Drake was only the first ENGLISHMAN to circumnavigate the globe, definitely not the first person. This is literally something we are taught in highschool history.

I liked the fact that he clarified that the barrier of the sea does not mean a physical partition, as in Arabic, the word is maraja - meet and mix with each other.

Some times he would just list recent discoveries, instead of the actual date, which was kinda annoying but sure look i understand there is only so much you can write in a book with less than a hundred pages.

[Athbi · Rating 4 out of 5]

It’s mentioned that this booklet only covers some of the scientific claims in the Holy Quran and the modern scientific discoveries which affirm them. With that in mind, it’s a great quick-paced booklet. Nevertheless, it is a bit outdated, so I would like to read an updated version with all the new discoveries made in science and how they relate to the Holy Quran since the release of this in 2008. I also would’ve appreciated it if for each claim, more depth of the scientific articles confirming the verses were covered as well as the author’s/scientist’s take on the Holy Quran’s ability to proclaim the undeniable existence of the Almighty.

[Lela]

Beware of false version of this book!!!

This is a scam of the original book that was published by darussalam!
Do not buy this book or any book published by ‘ Createspace Independent Publishing Platform’. This fake version is an absolute disgrace to the original version which is very highly regarded!

Darussalam original publishers need to be informed of this fake version being sold and circulated!

Please spread the word!

The book depository need to STOP selling this disgraceful fake version!