Killing the Rising Sun: How America Vanquished World War II Japan by Bill O’Reilly and Marin Dugard opens with a bizarre rant about comments made by Barak Obama’s pastor in 2001, and even though Obama did not even run for president until 2008, those comments were somehow still connected to him or his fault because the men are friends. Then, Bill O’Reilly makes a desperate reach to connect said comments to a general American ignorance about how and why atomic bombs were used against Japan in World War II, thus explaining his motivation for writing the book.
The story begins in 1939 with FDR and some American pre-war concerns, pulling the reader into an engaging, story-teller narrative that brings life to events long past. As we’re led into the action of war, Generals and grunts alike are introduced, life stories and personalities explained, giving a connection to these people, and making them more than names and dates on the page. General MacArthur is discussed at length. His military style and effectiveness, as well as his personal flaws and virtues are put under a microscope as the events in the Philippines are explored. O’Reilly is careful to give the appearance of neutrality early in the book, seeming to only present facts and let the reader come to their own conclusion.
From near the beginning, several pages are given to the description of Japanese brutality against the Chinese, the Koreans, the Filipinos, as well as American prisoners of war. The claims are factual, and deeply disturbing. Yet, these descriptions are frequent through the entire work, often added seemingly at random and unconnected to the battles or situations that had just been covered. Added to that, O’Reilly makes interesting and subtle language choices. The Japanese are described sometimes as soldiers, but also are termed “killers” who “creep forward to kill them [Americans]” in the night. Americans are always described in more heroic terms and any similar tactics are just smart battle plans. While at the very end, the author admits that “both Japanese and American forces committed horrendous acts in the name of winning the war,” the American acts are not once described or listed (other than the atomic bombs, and bombings in general, which are presented as unfortunate but necessary acts and not the acts the author is referring to). I felt that this was a telling omission.
However, the discussion about the necessity of using atomic bombs is more in depth than I was expecting. O’Reilly covered the wide spread opposition to their use, covering several individuals and their specific reasons. He gives facts and figures about the expected death toll of Allied forces if they had gone through with a land invasion. How close Japan was to surrendering before the A-bombs use was also discussed, which I personally found important. While the morality or necessity of the situation is always up to the individual in hindsight, having all the facts before forming an opinion is important. What type of surrender Japan was offering versus what kind of surrender America wanted (and why) is discussed at length, which ads a lot to the dialogue. I also appreciated that considerable pages are dedicated to the horrors the bombs, the devastating effects on innocent civilians from the moment they were dropped all the way through today.
Overall, Killing the Rising Sun is a very engaging work. Focusing largely on people instead of dates and death tolls was a wonderful choice and is bound to suck in the reader that might not otherwise have an interest in history. While on the surface, the book seems to be impartial, it certainly isn’t. The facts presented are true, but those facts are also very selective and obviously chosen to lead the reader to a certain conclusion (that America absolutely had to drop the A-bombs). I would have preferred honesty on the author’s part and the pretense of impartiality feels sneaky and offputting.