This book was recommended to me by a person who teaches "spiritual formation" in an Episcopal church. I'm not as impressed with it as she was (I'm also not Episcopalian).
My initial reaction was a dislike of the author's writing style. She seems to ramble on in places, then focus on a marginally related point for a few paragraphs, then ramble on some more, then actually address the thesis of her book, which is God's "dream" (which might be better described as God's plan or hope) for humanity and how we've failed him, and then she goes on to ramble some more. The book is based on transcripts of a series of lectures the author gave that were later edited to be read together as this book, and perhaps that is why the text seems to ramble so much -- people are more likely to ramble when they talk. Perhaps hearing and seeing her speak rather than reading these words would make them feel more cohesive because you would get vocal inflection and body language in the presentation. As it is, this may be a short book, but it is not a quick read because of the time it takes to figure out how all the pieces of her message fit together.
Her point seems to be that people should choose God in every circumstance (she gives three historical examples of our failure to do so). She advocates for people to follow Jesus by acting as he did rather than worship him; she also draws a distinction between what she calls "Jesus of the Bible" and "Christ of Christianity," the former being a man and the latter being deity, ultimately stating that Jesus is not God (her exact words). She seems upset or maybe disappointed that the "institutionalization of the church," allows people to somewhat passively live a Christian life, believing they are Christians living out God's will for them, by merely attending church or occasionally participating in the church's activities or causes, which is to say people have abdicated their responsibility to do the work Jesus did (i.e. follow Jesus) by letting church leaders do the work and just merely supporting that work. It's worth noting, however, that she also acknowledges that this "institutionalization" she seem to dislike so much was inevitable and actually necessary so that groups of believers wouldn't "go rogue" in the exercise of the faith.
As a side note, I found the descriptions of the author and her contributions to "the church" printed on the back of the book self-aggrandizing and thus off-putting. Maybe she is (or was) a big deal in the Episcopalian Church, but she did not "single-handedly revive the study of the Bible" and if she is "known all over the county and overseas" it must be within limited communities (like only within Episcopalian churches?). Having grown up in the Christian faith in both denominational and nondenominational churches, I'd never heard of her; I've since asked several people - clergy, laity, and everyday church goers - about this book and her, and no one has heard of this person or this book except the one person who recommended it to me.
I'm giving it two stars because I can appreciate her message and intent to the extent that she hopes to inspire people to do the work that Jesus did (although sometimes her intent seems to be to shame people into doing the work Jesus did), but the rest of her message, in my opinion, is either misplaced or incoherent due to the rambling. I just can't help but think that there are better books out there to inspire people to live a life like Jesus lived.