Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Stichus;

Rate this book
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.

88 pages, Paperback

Published August 28, 2016

19 people want to read

About the author

Plautus

1,881 books115 followers
Titus Maccius Plautus (c. 254 – 184 BC), commonly known as Plautus, was a Roman playwright of the Old Latin period. His comedies are the earliest works in Latin literature to have survived in their entirety. He wrote Palliata comoedia, the genre devised by the innovator of Latin literature, Livius Andronicus. The word Plautine refers to both Plautus's own works and works similar to or influenced by his.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1 (5%)
4 stars
2 (11%)
3 stars
5 (27%)
2 stars
8 (44%)
1 star
2 (11%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for Illiterate.
2,799 reviews56 followers
March 1, 2021
The parts are good but they don’t fit well. I like Gelasimus (a hungry scrounger) and the slaves’ banquet.
Profile Image for Santiago  González .
458 reviews8 followers
April 5, 2025
Tiene alguna parte buena pero el argumento no tiene sentido, tiene potencial de hacer una buena comedia con un mensaje moral (como una mezcla entre los Cautivos y alguna más sencilla y graciosa) y lo ha desaprovechado, se centra en un banquete soso, oportunidad desaprovechada.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.