In the preface, Murray writes, “Think of the book as a field guide” and its main topics reflect this advice: we draw from journals to write essays with endings and closings, using word pictures, figurative thought and character and dialogue. There’s revision, research, workshops and publication; and storytelling, fiction and poetry.
Like most writing advice books, the focus is on technique and the same patterns emerge as if these book authors had attended the same writing school. What is missing is a discussion about content – having something to say that is not only interesting but is also authentic.* One doesn’t sit down to write about nature so much as one needs to write about it.**
Here and there, Murray makes statements that raise the eyebrow. Novice writers he says make the mistake of ‘“dropping the narrator.’” Given an ego-driven world, I find that a relief. “Reading is, after all,” he writes elsewhere, “a passive activity.” Well, yes, in contrast with active writing, but a good read is anything but passive. And then there is this leaping cosmic assertion: “Metaphors explore the fundamental unity of the universe.”
Interesting tidbits: Thoreau was fluent in seven languages. Mark Twain edited Grant’s highly regarded memoirs. Hemmingway’s “The Old Man and the Sea” was thought by many to be an allegory in which “the sea represents the unconscious, the marlin represents the work of art extracted from the depths of the unconscious in an epic struggle, and the destruction of the marlin by the sharks represents what the world does to its creations.” I don’t know what this means.
I like the following pieces of advice:
• “Assume that the reader can draw his or her own conclusions.”
• “write for the ages.” (this seems dated now in age of social media?)
• “Do not share your work too soon with others.”
• “All grammatical and composition rules can and should be broken where circumstances dictate.”
*In fairness, Murray does write that “part of our responsibilities as writers…is to break new ground, to create new metaphors and similes as well as new themes and styles, and to provide readers….with fresh ways of looking at the world and thinking about the world.”
** It’s hard to imagine Muir or Thoreau attending a writer’s workshop; Abbey, on the other hand, apparently did.