What do you think?
Rate this book
道歉的力量：維護尊嚴與正義，進行對話與和解
一些感人至深、關於受辱而要求道歉的故事……
‧死亡列車：為被納粹屠殺的父母而控告法國國鐵的老先生—第3章
‧孩提被神父性侵而要求與神父對話的男人—第3章
‧美國印第安人事務局向美國原住民的道歉—第4章
‧越戰傷痕：遲到二十四年的道歉—第9章
‧宗教和解：教宗為傷害猶太人的歷史道歉—第9章
‧殺害猶太人的德國右翼份子的悔罪—第11章
‧心靈勇者：二戰英國戰俘與日本情報官的心靈救贖—第11章
這是一個關於道歉的真實故事……
越戰期間，普拉莫是一名戰鬥直升機飛行員，在一次轟炸任務中，普拉莫用燒夷彈與炸彈摧毀了一整座越南村莊。隔天報紙刊出一張後來舉世聞名的照片──年僅九歲的小女孩金福被火焚身、全身赤裸，張大著嘴巴，驚駭莫名地逃離遭烈火吞噬的家園……幾年後，普拉莫盯著照片，看見了被燒夷彈燒光了衣服的小女孩，知道那是自己的傑作，他頓時心裡難受得像是膝蓋遭到了重擊。
戰後數十年間，約翰•普拉莫酗酒成性，經歷了兩段失敗的婚姻，飽受折磨。他最終辭去了國防承包商的工作，轉而成為神職人員。可是儘管投身宗教的志業，他仍對那張深印在腦海中的照片耿耿於懷，一想起它就覺得心痛，甚至夢見那張照片，還聽見受害者的尖叫聲。普拉莫心想，如果小女孩能凝望他的雙眸深處，她會明白他為了自己對她造成的傷害，感到多麼的痛苦與無比的悔恨。
事發經過二十四年後，普拉莫終於與金福在華盛頓的越戰紀念碑相見，普拉莫不斷地向她說：「對不起，真的很對不起……」而她輕拍普拉莫的背，告訴他：「沒關係，我原諒你，原諒你了。」他們那天陪伴彼此，度過了兩個小時。「自從那天見過金福，我再也沒在睡夢中聽見任何聲音，再也沒有尖叫聲，一切復歸寧靜。」
道歉為何日益重要？
●網路、手機、社群媒體的普及，把這個星球上的人群都緊密地連結在一起了，許多冒犯或羞辱他人的想法與態度，更容易曝露在世人面前引發眾怒、破壞關係，甚至導致戰爭。成功的道歉可以挽回尊嚴、化解仇恨，進而和解。
●在民主制度愈發成熟的國家，另一個重要的社會發展，便是對道德與正義的關注與日俱增。如此一來，道歉便成為對承認歷史不公義的罪過、並負起責任的一種積極作為，也是鞏固國家政治穩定與力量而非恥辱的標誌。
●新的權力平衡在群體、國家之間轉移，原本勢單力薄的群體向先前貶低他們價值的人要求道歉。此舉打破了「上對下」的權威體制，因為在這種體制裡，沒有人會為了任何理由向他人道歉、規矩不能變通，領導人物也要別人相信他們永遠是對的。
●隨著女性崛起成為領導者，在社會上的權力與影響力提升，她們將引導社會採取跟男性截然不同的觀點來看待道歉的過程，而且相較於男性，也更擅於藉由道歉來處理不滿的情緒，增進團體的凝聚力，以及促進衝突的緩解。
道歉與接受道歉，是種意義深遠的人類互動行為
就像化解衝突對於家人、朋友、組織成員的重要性一樣，更大的群體之間因為領土、財富、種族、民族，以及宗教差異所產生的衝突，需要深刻的道歉才能解決。當個人、群體或是國家蒙羞的時候，是沒辦法和別人建立有來有往的平等關係；要是有些國家或群體有能力引發大規模的破壞，那麼羞辱所帶來的影響，就更不可小覷了。人們因為遭受羞辱而怒火中燒的時候，一心想的都是報復，除非對手不再逼迫他們失去人性，還有當他們的尊嚴得以恢復的時候，才有可能用另一種眼光來看待這個世界。
這些蒙羞的人，在當今世上多不勝數：那些為了重拾群體或國家榮耀而捨命的恐怖分子、伊拉克人、巴勒斯坦人與以色列人，還有各國都有的、那些身心匱乏的人……以上這些群體和國家，都經歷了長期的壓制和羞辱，可是在這個被網路、手機、大眾媒體緊密連結的地球村，屈辱感更是有增無減，因為那些別人擁有、他們卻喪失的東西，現在都能透過傳播媒體看得一清二楚了。處在屈辱感的心理狀態，會使一個人或國家透過恐懼和憤怒的眼光來詮釋外面的世界，這可能會削弱了他們的判斷力，也削弱了他們承認過失並加以改正的能力。
沒有善加化解屈辱感就會引發怨恨，甚至導致家人相殘與國家對戰。就此而言，成功的道歉能化解屈辱、恢復尊嚴、修復關係，讓人從滿懷罪惡感的心靈桎梏中解脫。昌盛繁榮的民主國家也應該要放下自負，謙卑地去協助處境艱難的國家和群體恢復尊嚴。唯有如此，這些國家和群體才有可能進行道歉與和解的對話。
‧死亡列車：為被納粹屠殺的父母而控告法國國鐵的老先生—第3章
‧孩提被神父性侵而要求與神父對話的男人—第3章
‧美國印第安人事務局向美國原住民的道歉—第4章
‧越戰傷痕：遲到二十四年的道歉—第9章
‧宗教和解：教宗為傷害猶太人的歷史道歉—第9章
‧殺害猶太人的德國右翼份子的悔罪—第11章
‧心靈勇者：二戰英國戰俘與日本情報官的心靈救贖—第11章
這是一個關於道歉的真實故事……
越戰期間，普拉莫是一名戰鬥直升機飛行員，在一次轟炸任務中，普拉莫用燒夷彈與炸彈摧毀了一整座越南村莊。隔天報紙刊出一張後來舉世聞名的照片──年僅九歲的小女孩金福被火焚身、全身赤裸，張大著嘴巴，驚駭莫名地逃離遭烈火吞噬的家園……幾年後，普拉莫盯著照片，看見了被燒夷彈燒光了衣服的小女孩，知道那是自己的傑作，他頓時心裡難受得像是膝蓋遭到了重擊。
戰後數十年間，約翰•普拉莫酗酒成性，經歷了兩段失敗的婚姻，飽受折磨。他最終辭去了國防承包商的工作，轉而成為神職人員。可是儘管投身宗教的志業，他仍對那張深印在腦海中的照片耿耿於懷，一想起它就覺得心痛，甚至夢見那張照片，還聽見受害者的尖叫聲。普拉莫心想，如果小女孩能凝望他的雙眸深處，她會明白他為了自己對她造成的傷害，感到多麼的痛苦與無比的悔恨。
事發經過二十四年後，普拉莫終於與金福在華盛頓的越戰紀念碑相見，普拉莫不斷地向她說：「對不起，真的很對不起……」而她輕拍普拉莫的背，告訴他：「沒關係，我原諒你，原諒你了。」他們那天陪伴彼此，度過了兩個小時。「自從那天見過金福，我再也沒在睡夢中聽見任何聲音，再也沒有尖叫聲，一切復歸寧靜。」
道歉為何日益重要？
●網路、手機、社群媒體的普及，把這個星球上的人群都緊密地連結在一起了，許多冒犯或羞辱他人的想法與態度，更容易曝露在世人面前引發眾怒、破壞關係，甚至導致戰爭。成功的道歉可以挽回尊嚴、化解仇恨，進而和解。
●在民主制度愈發成熟的國家，另一個重要的社會發展，便是對道德與正義的關注與日俱增。如此一來，道歉便成為對承認歷史不公義的罪過、並負起責任的一種積極作為，也是鞏固國家政治穩定與力量而非恥辱的標誌。
●新的權力平衡在群體、國家之間轉移，原本勢單力薄的群體向先前貶低他們價值的人要求道歉。此舉打破了「上對下」的權威體制，因為在這種體制裡，沒有人會為了任何理由向他人道歉、規矩不能變通，領導人物也要別人相信他們永遠是對的。
●隨著女性崛起成為領導者，在社會上的權力與影響力提升，她們將引導社會採取跟男性截然不同的觀點來看待道歉的過程，而且相較於男性，也更擅於藉由道歉來處理不滿的情緒，增進團體的凝聚力，以及促進衝突的緩解。
道歉與接受道歉，是種意義深遠的人類互動行為
就像化解衝突對於家人、朋友、組織成員的重要性一樣，更大的群體之間因為領土、財富、種族、民族，以及宗教差異所產生的衝突，需要深刻的道歉才能解決。當個人、群體或是國家蒙羞的時候，是沒辦法和別人建立有來有往的平等關係；要是有些國家或群體有能力引發大規模的破壞，那麼羞辱所帶來的影響，就更不可小覷了。人們因為遭受羞辱而怒火中燒的時候，一心想的都是報復，除非對手不再逼迫他們失去人性，還有當他們的尊嚴得以恢復的時候，才有可能用另一種眼光來看待這個世界。
這些蒙羞的人，在當今世上多不勝數：那些為了重拾群體或國家榮耀而捨命的恐怖分子、伊拉克人、巴勒斯坦人與以色列人，還有各國都有的、那些身心匱乏的人……以上這些群體和國家，都經歷了長期的壓制和羞辱，可是在這個被網路、手機、大眾媒體緊密連結的地球村，屈辱感更是有增無減，因為那些別人擁有、他們卻喪失的東西，現在都能透過傳播媒體看得一清二楚了。處在屈辱感的心理狀態，會使一個人或國家透過恐懼和憤怒的眼光來詮釋外面的世界，這可能會削弱了他們的判斷力，也削弱了他們承認過失並加以改正的能力。
沒有善加化解屈辱感就會引發怨恨，甚至導致家人相殘與國家對戰。就此而言，成功的道歉能化解屈辱、恢復尊嚴、修復關係，讓人從滿懷罪惡感的心靈桎梏中解脫。昌盛繁榮的民主國家也應該要放下自負，謙卑地去協助處境艱難的國家和群體恢復尊嚴。唯有如此，這些國家和群體才有可能進行道歉與和解的對話。
384 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 2004
41 people are currently reading
572 people want to read
About the author
Aaron Lazare
8 books5 followersAaron Lazare, M.D., was chancellor, dean, and professor of psychiatry at the University of Massachusetts Medical School. He was a leading authority on the medical interview, the psychology of shame and humiliation, and apology. His most recent book is On Apology (Oxford University Press, 2004).
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 35 reviews
July 5, 2016
This book started out really boring. The first chapter is so boring, but it ends with a rather interesting personal story from the author.
One experience from my family illustrates how even an apparently simple apology can have a complexity that teaches many lessons. On a Saturday afternoon, my wife bought her favorite treat for dessert that evening, a gourmet, nut-filled brownie. But as dinnertime approached, my wife was unable to find it. Suspecting our youngest child, Naomi, then 16, who was the only child in the house at the time, my wife asked her whether she had taken the brownie. Naomi denied the accusation. But my wife was confident that Naomi was the culprit, and so she began to lecture her on the importance of telling the truth and of trust in relationships. Naomi continued her denial.
The next morning, my wife asked again. "Naomi, are you sure you did not take the brownie? I hate to think one of my children would do such a thing. There must be trust between a mother and a daughter." (Notice the level of the discussion had now escalated from taking a brownie to trust between a mother and daughter.) Our daughter denied it even more emphatically. She then turned her gaze to just over my wife's head and spotted the missing brownie on a shelf where my wife had originally placed it. My wife now remembered putting it there. Naomi's face turned smug and self-satisfied as she said, "Well, are you going to apologize?"
My wife than launched into a sincere, agonizing, and shame-filled apology. "I am so very sorry that I thought you or any of my children would have taken the brownie and would have lied about it," she said. "I feel so terrible... " etc. My daughter castigated her by saying, "You should have known that I am allergic to nuts and would never have taken a brownie with nuts. Don't you know about my allergies?" My daughter was not presuming high moral principles, since taking candy or pastries from one another is not, according to family standards, a mortal sin. The mortal sin is lying about it. Naomi was now offended (or at least pretending to be offended) that she was being accused of taking a pastry with nuts when a good mother should know that her daughter is allergic to nuts.
Naomi let my wife continue with her apology until she felt she had seen her suffer enough. She then said with smug pleasure on her face, "I love it when you apologize, Mother, because it makes you feel so foolish." Several weeks later, my wife phoned me at work to tell me that Naomi apologized for something she had done. This event was remarkable because we could not recall Naomi ever apologizing for anything.
I was horrified by this story and since Lazare was describing this as "a successful apology," I was worried about the future of this book.
For one thing, why didn't the daughter use the nut-allergy defense right away?
Two, in my family if the parent was in the wrong and apologized sincerely to the child and the child responded with a smug "I love it when you apologize, Mother, because it makes you feel so foolish.", she or he would have beenslapped in deep, deep trouble for disrespecting a parent like that, especially for acting like a little snide brat when someone is giving you a sincere apology. That shit would not fly.
It's disrespectful and wrong to make people grovel and beg. I'm not into humiliation.
Three, it seems as if he's saying this experience taught Naomi to apologize? Not sure how since apparently sees apologies as a chance to really humiliate people and rub their faces in feces.
However, despite the... weirdness... of this story, the book turned out to be stellar. Lazare covers so many different aspects of apologies. He doesn't go into depth about a lot of things, but he does try to touch on many relevant topics.
Sometimes, saying "I'm sorry" is not an apology, as in "I'm sorry your aunt is ill." This is not an acceptance of blame, but instead a profession of concern and empathy. Lazare also talks about 'false' apologies a lot, and why they are so unsatisfying.
A simple test for determining whether "I apologize" is an apology in the formal sense of the word is to ask whether the person making the statement would repeat the behavior if a similar situation arose.
He talks about how women are more comfortable with apologizing, likely to apologize, and have a higher proclivity for guilt (although he doesn't get far into this subject). He talks about cultural differences in apologizing, mainly focusing on American, Japanese and Chinese sensibilities.
He talks about what makes a good apology and why people apologize - they could be doing so to assuage internal guilt and their conscience, they could be trying to please and appease their superiors, they could be forced by society to issue an apology they don't really mean.
Can there be nonverbal apologies? Lazare says yes and gives some real life examples, including drivers apologizing to each other using facial expressions and hand gestures, President Harry S. Truman's trip to Mexico in 1947, and Pope John Paul II's visit to the Western Wall.
He also describes brief apologies, such as the ones you make after accidentally bumping into someone or keeping a borrowed book for six months.
He also discusses who should make apologies and when.
Could a president who has never served in the military successfully apologize on behalf of the nation? Does a sitting Roman Catholic pope have the standing to apologize for the mistakes of the church's priests and parishioners from earlier centuries?
This is strange to me, I don't really see why a president who didn't serve in the military would be unqualified to make apologies on behalf of the nation... but oh well.
Lazare is also fascinated with and deeply delves into the idea of apologies that take place decades or centuries after an offense.
...are we guilty for acts we did not personally commit, many of which occurred before we were born?.... Should Germans born after World War II be held responsible for Nazi atrocities?... ...people are not guilty for actions in which they did not participate. But just as people take pride in things for which they had no responsibility (such as famous ancestors, national championships of their sports teams, and great accomplishments of their nation), so, too, must these people accept the shame (but not the guilt) of their family, their athletic teams, and their nations. Accepting national pride must include willingness to accept national shame when one's country has not measured up to reasonable standards. I believe that this accountability is what we mean when we speak of having a national identity, or a sense of national belonging, or a national soul.
Lazare also discusses apologies in personal relationships.
By apologizing, the offending party reaffirms his or her commitment to the rules and values implicit in the relationship by saying, in essence, "I really am the person you thought I was." Trust is thus reestablished, making the relationship safe and predictable once again. Such apologies remind us that people can make mistakes and recover from them, that values once ignored can be reestablished, that relationships once damaged can be healed. We breathe easier knowing that our original estimation of the offending party was correct after all: Our trust was not misplaced.
One thing I really like about this book is all the real life, public examples of apologies Lazare discusses. Monica Lewinsky. Bryan Smith to Stephen King. Prince August to Turkey. Latrell Sprewell to his coach. Senator Conrad Burns to Arabs. Liberal Democrat Ota's comments on gangrape. Bob Ryan. John Cheney. Roy E. Frankhouser. General Patton. De Kock. Kurt Werner Schaechter. Curtis Oathout. Cardinal Bernard Law. President Abraham Lincoln. Richard von Weizsacker. Kevin Grover. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Janet Jackson. President Clinton, President Grant. Cardinal Edward M. Egan. President Richard Nixon. The newspaper at Spokane Community College. Carlos Jagmetti. Fuzzy Zoeller. U.S. Col. Kassem Saleh. The IRA. Walter Mondale. Scott D. Waddle. Mike Tyson. Justin A. Volpe. Robert S. McNamara. James Kartell. President F.W. de Klerk. Timothy McVeigh. Samuel Sewall. Dick Armey. Steven Glass. Victor Crawford. General Robert E. Lee. David Brinkley. Reverend Jerry Falwell. John Plummer to Kim Phuc. Bobby Powers to Theodore Landsmark. George Steinbrenner to Yogi Berra. Muhammad Ali and Joe Frazier. Reverend Billy Graham. Janet Dailey. Govenor George Wallace. David Brock to Anita Hill. Richard Reeves to President Gerald Ford. Bobby Hall. Joseph Prueher. Captain Charles D. Wilkes. Joseph J. Ellis. Senator Trent Lott. Steven Cook and Cardinal Joseph Bernadin. Ernst Werner Techow. Eric Lomax and Nagase Takashi.
Whether you know all or none of these stories, they are fascinating as Lazare breaks them down and analyzes the motives behind the apologies and if they were sincere or not.
He also discusses literature and how apologies are portrayed in literature. His analysis of Agamemnon's apology to Achilles is on point. Also,
From a literary perspective, Elaine Showalter, a professor of English literature at Princeton University, argues that male authors allow their male characters to mistreat women and escape without an apology... She writes, "Allowing a hero to humiliate himself before a wronged woman would render him awkward, wimpish, embarrassing, and lacking in sex appeal - in a word, unmanned." Showalter argues that "if literary heroes never apologize and rarely explain... it must be because male authors regard such actions as dishonorable.
...
Showalter adds that, in contrast, female writers make men live up to their misdeeds, "forgiveness comes the hard way: you have to earn it."
Obviously she's not talking about "genre fiction" but "literary fiction" only, still, I thought this was interesting - and she uses lots of examples to illustrate this in the book.
Why is apologizing harder for some people than others?
We can surmise what personality traits in people make it particularly difficult for them to apologize: They need to be in firm control of interpersonal situations. They need to be in control of their emotions. They need to feel right or morally superior most of the time; they believe they rarely make mistakes. They assume the world is hostile and that relationships are inherently dangerous. In contrast, people who find it easy to apologize accept sharing control of interpersonal situations and enjoy relationships with others. They accept, respect, and even enjoy their emotions. They can acknowledge their vulnerabilities, weaknesses, and flaws while constantly trying to improve. They believe they are reasonable and decent people and assume that others share these traits. When they apologize, they are merely admitting they made a mistake. Such an admission is not a threat so long as they feel good about themselves and feel that THEY are not a mistake.
Lazare also talks about forgiveness.
First, the act of forgiving people with no apology. For instance, forgiving your dead, abusive parents. People who never forgive no matter what. People who offer forgiveness with an expectation of a future apology - such as a mother forgiving a murderer for killing her son, or a man forgiving a robber for robbing him. This doesn't pardon criminals from court justice, but it can help them repair their souls and do better in the future. Lastly, people who only bestow forgiveness on people who have apologized, which Lazare points out is the most religiously sound way of doing things for both Jewish and Christian peoples.
Tl;dr - In short, although this book gets off to a rocky start, it ended up being very informative and educational. I learned a lot, not only about apologies and apologizing, but also about history. Lazare is a good and interesting writer - he knows not to drag stories out for too long and he knows not to lecture without also giving us entertaining, real life examples.
I would recommend this book to anyone with an interest.
One experience from my family illustrates how even an apparently simple apology can have a complexity that teaches many lessons. On a Saturday afternoon, my wife bought her favorite treat for dessert that evening, a gourmet, nut-filled brownie. But as dinnertime approached, my wife was unable to find it. Suspecting our youngest child, Naomi, then 16, who was the only child in the house at the time, my wife asked her whether she had taken the brownie. Naomi denied the accusation. But my wife was confident that Naomi was the culprit, and so she began to lecture her on the importance of telling the truth and of trust in relationships. Naomi continued her denial.
The next morning, my wife asked again. "Naomi, are you sure you did not take the brownie? I hate to think one of my children would do such a thing. There must be trust between a mother and a daughter." (Notice the level of the discussion had now escalated from taking a brownie to trust between a mother and daughter.) Our daughter denied it even more emphatically. She then turned her gaze to just over my wife's head and spotted the missing brownie on a shelf where my wife had originally placed it. My wife now remembered putting it there. Naomi's face turned smug and self-satisfied as she said, "Well, are you going to apologize?"
My wife than launched into a sincere, agonizing, and shame-filled apology. "I am so very sorry that I thought you or any of my children would have taken the brownie and would have lied about it," she said. "I feel so terrible... " etc. My daughter castigated her by saying, "You should have known that I am allergic to nuts and would never have taken a brownie with nuts. Don't you know about my allergies?" My daughter was not presuming high moral principles, since taking candy or pastries from one another is not, according to family standards, a mortal sin. The mortal sin is lying about it. Naomi was now offended (or at least pretending to be offended) that she was being accused of taking a pastry with nuts when a good mother should know that her daughter is allergic to nuts.
Naomi let my wife continue with her apology until she felt she had seen her suffer enough. She then said with smug pleasure on her face, "I love it when you apologize, Mother, because it makes you feel so foolish." Several weeks later, my wife phoned me at work to tell me that Naomi apologized for something she had done. This event was remarkable because we could not recall Naomi ever apologizing for anything.
I was horrified by this story and since Lazare was describing this as "a successful apology," I was worried about the future of this book.
For one thing, why didn't the daughter use the nut-allergy defense right away?
Two, in my family if the parent was in the wrong and apologized sincerely to the child and the child responded with a smug "I love it when you apologize, Mother, because it makes you feel so foolish.", she or he would have been
It's disrespectful and wrong to make people grovel and beg. I'm not into humiliation.
Three, it seems as if he's saying this experience taught Naomi to apologize? Not sure how since apparently sees apologies as a chance to really humiliate people and rub their faces in feces.
However, despite the... weirdness... of this story, the book turned out to be stellar. Lazare covers so many different aspects of apologies. He doesn't go into depth about a lot of things, but he does try to touch on many relevant topics.
Sometimes, saying "I'm sorry" is not an apology, as in "I'm sorry your aunt is ill." This is not an acceptance of blame, but instead a profession of concern and empathy. Lazare also talks about 'false' apologies a lot, and why they are so unsatisfying.
A simple test for determining whether "I apologize" is an apology in the formal sense of the word is to ask whether the person making the statement would repeat the behavior if a similar situation arose.
He talks about how women are more comfortable with apologizing, likely to apologize, and have a higher proclivity for guilt (although he doesn't get far into this subject). He talks about cultural differences in apologizing, mainly focusing on American, Japanese and Chinese sensibilities.
He talks about what makes a good apology and why people apologize - they could be doing so to assuage internal guilt and their conscience, they could be trying to please and appease their superiors, they could be forced by society to issue an apology they don't really mean.
Can there be nonverbal apologies? Lazare says yes and gives some real life examples, including drivers apologizing to each other using facial expressions and hand gestures, President Harry S. Truman's trip to Mexico in 1947, and Pope John Paul II's visit to the Western Wall.
He also describes brief apologies, such as the ones you make after accidentally bumping into someone or keeping a borrowed book for six months.
He also discusses who should make apologies and when.
Could a president who has never served in the military successfully apologize on behalf of the nation? Does a sitting Roman Catholic pope have the standing to apologize for the mistakes of the church's priests and parishioners from earlier centuries?
This is strange to me, I don't really see why a president who didn't serve in the military would be unqualified to make apologies on behalf of the nation... but oh well.
Lazare is also fascinated with and deeply delves into the idea of apologies that take place decades or centuries after an offense.
...are we guilty for acts we did not personally commit, many of which occurred before we were born?.... Should Germans born after World War II be held responsible for Nazi atrocities?... ...people are not guilty for actions in which they did not participate. But just as people take pride in things for which they had no responsibility (such as famous ancestors, national championships of their sports teams, and great accomplishments of their nation), so, too, must these people accept the shame (but not the guilt) of their family, their athletic teams, and their nations. Accepting national pride must include willingness to accept national shame when one's country has not measured up to reasonable standards. I believe that this accountability is what we mean when we speak of having a national identity, or a sense of national belonging, or a national soul.
Lazare also discusses apologies in personal relationships.
By apologizing, the offending party reaffirms his or her commitment to the rules and values implicit in the relationship by saying, in essence, "I really am the person you thought I was." Trust is thus reestablished, making the relationship safe and predictable once again. Such apologies remind us that people can make mistakes and recover from them, that values once ignored can be reestablished, that relationships once damaged can be healed. We breathe easier knowing that our original estimation of the offending party was correct after all: Our trust was not misplaced.
One thing I really like about this book is all the real life, public examples of apologies Lazare discusses. Monica Lewinsky. Bryan Smith to Stephen King. Prince August to Turkey. Latrell Sprewell to his coach. Senator Conrad Burns to Arabs. Liberal Democrat Ota's comments on gangrape. Bob Ryan. John Cheney. Roy E. Frankhouser. General Patton. De Kock. Kurt Werner Schaechter. Curtis Oathout. Cardinal Bernard Law. President Abraham Lincoln. Richard von Weizsacker. Kevin Grover. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Janet Jackson. President Clinton, President Grant. Cardinal Edward M. Egan. President Richard Nixon. The newspaper at Spokane Community College. Carlos Jagmetti. Fuzzy Zoeller. U.S. Col. Kassem Saleh. The IRA. Walter Mondale. Scott D. Waddle. Mike Tyson. Justin A. Volpe. Robert S. McNamara. James Kartell. President F.W. de Klerk. Timothy McVeigh. Samuel Sewall. Dick Armey. Steven Glass. Victor Crawford. General Robert E. Lee. David Brinkley. Reverend Jerry Falwell. John Plummer to Kim Phuc. Bobby Powers to Theodore Landsmark. George Steinbrenner to Yogi Berra. Muhammad Ali and Joe Frazier. Reverend Billy Graham. Janet Dailey. Govenor George Wallace. David Brock to Anita Hill. Richard Reeves to President Gerald Ford. Bobby Hall. Joseph Prueher. Captain Charles D. Wilkes. Joseph J. Ellis. Senator Trent Lott. Steven Cook and Cardinal Joseph Bernadin. Ernst Werner Techow. Eric Lomax and Nagase Takashi.
Whether you know all or none of these stories, they are fascinating as Lazare breaks them down and analyzes the motives behind the apologies and if they were sincere or not.
He also discusses literature and how apologies are portrayed in literature. His analysis of Agamemnon's apology to Achilles is on point. Also,
From a literary perspective, Elaine Showalter, a professor of English literature at Princeton University, argues that male authors allow their male characters to mistreat women and escape without an apology... She writes, "Allowing a hero to humiliate himself before a wronged woman would render him awkward, wimpish, embarrassing, and lacking in sex appeal - in a word, unmanned." Showalter argues that "if literary heroes never apologize and rarely explain... it must be because male authors regard such actions as dishonorable.
...
Showalter adds that, in contrast, female writers make men live up to their misdeeds, "forgiveness comes the hard way: you have to earn it."
Obviously she's not talking about "genre fiction" but "literary fiction" only, still, I thought this was interesting - and she uses lots of examples to illustrate this in the book.
Why is apologizing harder for some people than others?
We can surmise what personality traits in people make it particularly difficult for them to apologize: They need to be in firm control of interpersonal situations. They need to be in control of their emotions. They need to feel right or morally superior most of the time; they believe they rarely make mistakes. They assume the world is hostile and that relationships are inherently dangerous. In contrast, people who find it easy to apologize accept sharing control of interpersonal situations and enjoy relationships with others. They accept, respect, and even enjoy their emotions. They can acknowledge their vulnerabilities, weaknesses, and flaws while constantly trying to improve. They believe they are reasonable and decent people and assume that others share these traits. When they apologize, they are merely admitting they made a mistake. Such an admission is not a threat so long as they feel good about themselves and feel that THEY are not a mistake.
Lazare also talks about forgiveness.
First, the act of forgiving people with no apology. For instance, forgiving your dead, abusive parents. People who never forgive no matter what. People who offer forgiveness with an expectation of a future apology - such as a mother forgiving a murderer for killing her son, or a man forgiving a robber for robbing him. This doesn't pardon criminals from court justice, but it can help them repair their souls and do better in the future. Lastly, people who only bestow forgiveness on people who have apologized, which Lazare points out is the most religiously sound way of doing things for both Jewish and Christian peoples.
Tl;dr - In short, although this book gets off to a rocky start, it ended up being very informative and educational. I learned a lot, not only about apologies and apologizing, but also about history. Lazare is a good and interesting writer - he knows not to drag stories out for too long and he knows not to lecture without also giving us entertaining, real life examples.
I would recommend this book to anyone with an interest.
June 29, 2011
One of the best written non-fiction books I've ever read. A thorough and not too horribly US-centric examination of both public and private apologies that distinguishes between an apologia (essentially self justification) and a true apology, while exploring the very human need to admit wrongdoing (on the part of the offender) and to have the wrongdoing acknowledged (on the part of the offended party). Ok now I'm starting to sound a lawyer. This topic fascinates me - what can I say?
May 29, 2018
In a perfect world. people would view the act of apologizing as empowering (for both parties in an offense) and not as a sign of weakness. But then, of course, a perfect world - being perfect - would have no need of apologies.
The world we inhabit is far from perfect. ~which is why - in his invaluable work gathered in this terrific and very accessible book - Dr. Lazare states that the world may finally be realizing it needs the act and the art of the apology more than ever. As is stated: "Academic disciplines of sociology, social psychology and psycholinguistics became interested in research on apologies beginning in the 1970s, and the few books on contemporary apologies and 'how to apologize' did not appear until the 1990s." Its value is gaining ground.
Lazare has been studying apology for awhile now; it's his primary interest. He asserts that, as our world continues to become 'smaller' as the result of being more closely inter-connected, the apology should be mankind's primary interest as well. He makes a convincing case; I agree with him.
A particular point Lazare makes is the distinction between apology and forgiveness - that people can find it much easier to forgive (or be forgiven) than to apologize. The act of forgiveness is less work - but forgiveness and apology are intertwined and only satisfyingly effective when they're together.
Lazare looks at apology from what seems every possible angle of the act itself, and he illustrates how apologizing plays out on levels that can be personal as well as international and inter-cultural. He has compiled a lot of (often fascinating and gripping) stories that bear out his claims.
On the back cover of the book, there is a quote from the starred review from 'Publishers Weekly': "Everybody on Earth could benefit from this small but essential book." ....I'd say that's accurate.
The world we inhabit is far from perfect. ~which is why - in his invaluable work gathered in this terrific and very accessible book - Dr. Lazare states that the world may finally be realizing it needs the act and the art of the apology more than ever. As is stated: "Academic disciplines of sociology, social psychology and psycholinguistics became interested in research on apologies beginning in the 1970s, and the few books on contemporary apologies and 'how to apologize' did not appear until the 1990s." Its value is gaining ground.
Lazare has been studying apology for awhile now; it's his primary interest. He asserts that, as our world continues to become 'smaller' as the result of being more closely inter-connected, the apology should be mankind's primary interest as well. He makes a convincing case; I agree with him.
A particular point Lazare makes is the distinction between apology and forgiveness - that people can find it much easier to forgive (or be forgiven) than to apologize. The act of forgiveness is less work - but forgiveness and apology are intertwined and only satisfyingly effective when they're together.
Lazare looks at apology from what seems every possible angle of the act itself, and he illustrates how apologizing plays out on levels that can be personal as well as international and inter-cultural. He has compiled a lot of (often fascinating and gripping) stories that bear out his claims.
On the back cover of the book, there is a quote from the starred review from 'Publishers Weekly': "Everybody on Earth could benefit from this small but essential book." ....I'd say that's accurate.
June 9, 2024
An outstanding book on the art and science of apology. So interesting and a very enjoyable read.
December 14, 2012
If only I could write this well.
At first glance this books seems a little too simplistic. But looking back on it, that's just not the case. It just seems that way because Lazare is such a good writer. I mean this in two ways. First, his sentences are just easy to read. They're conversational without talking down to the reader. Second, this books is wonderfully structured at multiple levels. He carefully disambiguates the elements of an apology, the motivations that push us to want apologies, the motives that push us to want to give them, the timing of apologies, failed apologies, etc.
Most chapters have the following format:
-he introduces the central concept of the chapter
-he introduces the relevant elements of that concept
-he dedicates a subsection to each element
In each subsection, he begins by very briefly describing that element in the abstract, then presents a number of cases that illustrate the point.
It's mercifully clear and easy to follow. This in turn makes his analysis stand out even more. Again, you'd think that such a structured approach would end up being boring, but that's not at all the case. Or maybe you'd think that the reliance on case studies would make this a less-than-serious think piece. Yet that's not the case either. There is a good amount of material here whether you're a layperson or using the book as an academic resource.
At first glance this books seems a little too simplistic. But looking back on it, that's just not the case. It just seems that way because Lazare is such a good writer. I mean this in two ways. First, his sentences are just easy to read. They're conversational without talking down to the reader. Second, this books is wonderfully structured at multiple levels. He carefully disambiguates the elements of an apology, the motivations that push us to want apologies, the motives that push us to want to give them, the timing of apologies, failed apologies, etc.
Most chapters have the following format:
-he introduces the central concept of the chapter
-he introduces the relevant elements of that concept
-he dedicates a subsection to each element
In each subsection, he begins by very briefly describing that element in the abstract, then presents a number of cases that illustrate the point.
It's mercifully clear and easy to follow. This in turn makes his analysis stand out even more. Again, you'd think that such a structured approach would end up being boring, but that's not at all the case. Or maybe you'd think that the reliance on case studies would make this a less-than-serious think piece. Yet that's not the case either. There is a good amount of material here whether you're a layperson or using the book as an academic resource.
April 26, 2009
Reading this short and insightful book will make you think about your own relationships and situations in which you were the offended seeking an apology versus being the offender and offering (or coerced into giving) an apology. There are many nuggets of wisdom to be gleaned from this book, such as how to give an effective and proper apology, when to apology immediately and when to wait, and why apologies can be powerful and life changing even after more than half a century between the actual apology and the original offense.
Author Aaron Lazare started out the book talking about the increase in apologies found in media outlets in recent years and the growing importance of apologies in an interconnected world: the global village as he called it. He mentions companies in China that specialize in apologies and the differences between cultures concerning apologies - what is acceptable versus what isn't. He even touched upon the increasing numbers of women and minorities in high level positions within corporations and governments and how their values toward apologies will shape the future. I wish the book focused more on these issues.
Author Aaron Lazare started out the book talking about the increase in apologies found in media outlets in recent years and the growing importance of apologies in an interconnected world: the global village as he called it. He mentions companies in China that specialize in apologies and the differences between cultures concerning apologies - what is acceptable versus what isn't. He even touched upon the increasing numbers of women and minorities in high level positions within corporations and governments and how their values toward apologies will shape the future. I wish the book focused more on these issues.
August 16, 2008
Lazare distinguishes between so-called "apologies" that are merely expressions of regret or empathy, apologies in the Greek sense that are simply explanations, and true apologies that involve the acceptance of responsibility. What Lazare calls "genuine apology" requires a person to "acknowledge the offense adequately," "express genuine remorse," and "offer appropriate reparations, including a commitment to make changes in the future." (p. 9) Lazare says that people can be motivated to apologize because of "their empathic concern for others or their inner distress of guilt and shame" or they may "want to influence how others perceive and behave towards them." (p. 134)
Execution is important because "an apology that fails is potentially more destructive than no apology at all. With no apology, one can hope for a future apology, but with a failed apology, one often concludes that the matter is hopeless." (p. 73)
Aaron Lazare. On Apology. Oxford University Press, 2004.
Execution is important because "an apology that fails is potentially more destructive than no apology at all. With no apology, one can hope for a future apology, but with a failed apology, one often concludes that the matter is hopeless." (p. 73)
Aaron Lazare. On Apology. Oxford University Press, 2004.
June 29, 2009
When my cousin Deb heard Aaron Lazare speak in Boston she bought his book after the lecture. She was really moved by what he said. My faith in her judgment led me to pick it up as well. I've never come across a book like this before; that covers the subject of "apology" from so many perspectives. It is part story-telling, part analysis, part history lesson. This book definitely informed my own work as I wrote "Inheriting the Trade" and will continue to inform my writing and my life. So often we fear dealing with the complicated issue of apology when, in fact, apology is part of the pathway to healing damaged relationships. I heartily recommend "On Apology" to anyone interested in understanding more deeply our shared humanity and the process of apologizing.
September 7, 2008
If you want to know what a good apology is and why it is so important then this a book for you. I found it at the library. Among the many little nuggets that make it worth reading....."an apology that fails is potentially more destructive than no apology at all. With no apology, one can hope for a future apology, but with a failed apology, one often concludes that the matter is hopeless." (p. 73)
March 12, 2013
Not enough interesting information to be engaging. Although the chapter on when to delay an apology was definitely novel, this book felt more like a manual on common sense than a guide to repairing personal relationships.
May 13, 2010
I still use the precepts I learned from this book. A genuine apology offers explanation, a communication of remorse, and an offer of recompense. No "I'm sorry if I hurt your feelings!"
October 10, 2013
An authentic and effective apology includes two components......the apologizer's authentic remorse and the willingness of the offended party to accept it.
Read
April 4, 2024"Apology is more than an acknowledgment of an offense together with an expression of remorse. It is an ongoing commitment by the offending party to change his or her behavior. It is a particular way of resolving conflicts other than by arguing over who is bigger and better. It is a powerful and constructive form of conflict resolution, embedded, in modified form, in religion and the judicial system. It is a method of social healing that has grown in importance as our way of living together on our planet undergoes radical change. It is a social act in which the person, group, or nation apologizing has historically been viewed as weak, but more than ever is now being regarded as strong. It is a behavior that requires of both parties attitudes of honesty, generosity, humility, commitment, and courage."
June 10, 2019
On the face of it, making an apology seems simple. This book will open your eyes to all the different facets of an apology such as acknowledging an offense, expressing remorse and shame, making reparations, ensuring the offense won't happen again, etc. Author Aaron Lazare provides numerous real life examples that I found interesting. It is easy to skim parts that don't grab your attention. Overall, a good read and very helpful information to anyone. After all, we all mess up.
January 28, 2018
Although at times unnecessarily repetitive, the book gives compelling evidence for the importance of apology in our lives. I agree with Lazare's suggestion that studies in all disciplines could benefit from including lessons in the act of apology.
November 5, 2017
Interesting look at the phenomena of apology. Why we do it, what the mechanics are, what constitutes a true apology, why we wait.
Lots (maybe too many?) of examples and anecdotes of apologies.
Lots (maybe too many?) of examples and anecdotes of apologies.
July 11, 2023
Really good social science book on apology. What a good one looks like. What makes a bad apology. Motivations. How apologies can heal. Why people don’t apologize. Lots of historical examples.
Read
February 12, 2024prob my fav i've read for my thesis so far. even though this guy has some questionable opinions about janet jackson and monica lewinsky....
January 16, 2025
Another important read for anybody who is human or who interacts with humans.
December 14, 2020
Aaron Lazare was dean of the University of Massachussets Medical School for over 15 years. His treatise on apology is a mixture of thoughts. He shines most when looking at and characterizing high profile celebrity apologies and organizing different types of apologies. Overall, I found the book to be too descriptive in analysis (i.e, the "what"), and short on providing insights on the psychology involved in human relations (i.e., the "why").
Fundamentally apolgies are highly emotional and vulnerable transactions. The book left me unsatisfied because it didn't sufficiently address these very human elements.
Fundamentally apolgies are highly emotional and vulnerable transactions. The book left me unsatisfied because it didn't sufficiently address these very human elements.
Read
January 31, 2011I read many short articles on apologies, and then read this book. I am not a self-help book fan, and while this book IS that, it is so much more. At the risk of boring you:
From Publishers Weekly
This jewel of a book reveals the many facets of the simple act of apology. Given, there are significant cultural differences in the way humans apologize. "Japanese apologies are more apt to communicate submissiveness, humility, and meekness whereas Americans are more apt to communicate sincerity," writes Lazare, a professor of psychiatry at the University of Massachusetts Medical School. Under the surface of their differing presentations, however, in spite of their length or even sometimes their complete wordlessness, all true apologies are a kind of offering intended to restore the dignity and self-respect of the offended party, according to the author. An apology can work a miracle, inspiring spontaneous generosity and forgiveness on the part of the offended, whether it is a whole people or a single individual. Drawing on a vast array of literary and real-life examples, such as Agamemnon, George Patton and Arnold Schwarzenegger, from the current pope to the machinist who approached him after a lecture, Lazare lucidly dissects the process of apology: offering an explanation; communicating remorse, shame, humility or sincerity (according to our cultural values); making a gesture of reparation or reconciliation. Among the most moving examples in the book is Lincoln's second inaugural address, in which he apologizes for American slavery : "two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil" enabling some to "wring their bread from the sweat of other men's faces." Just as breathtaking was the apology made by Kevin Gover, an assistant secretary of Indian affairs, for that agency's grave crimes against the Indian people. Lazare succeeds in showing that a true apology is among the most graceful and profound of all human exchanges. When it is sincere, it is not an end but a new beginning. "It is a behavior that requires of both parties an attitude of honesty, generosity, humility, commitment, and courage," he writes. Everybody on earth could benefit from this small but essential book.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
From Publishers Weekly
This jewel of a book reveals the many facets of the simple act of apology. Given, there are significant cultural differences in the way humans apologize. "Japanese apologies are more apt to communicate submissiveness, humility, and meekness whereas Americans are more apt to communicate sincerity," writes Lazare, a professor of psychiatry at the University of Massachusetts Medical School. Under the surface of their differing presentations, however, in spite of their length or even sometimes their complete wordlessness, all true apologies are a kind of offering intended to restore the dignity and self-respect of the offended party, according to the author. An apology can work a miracle, inspiring spontaneous generosity and forgiveness on the part of the offended, whether it is a whole people or a single individual. Drawing on a vast array of literary and real-life examples, such as Agamemnon, George Patton and Arnold Schwarzenegger, from the current pope to the machinist who approached him after a lecture, Lazare lucidly dissects the process of apology: offering an explanation; communicating remorse, shame, humility or sincerity (according to our cultural values); making a gesture of reparation or reconciliation. Among the most moving examples in the book is Lincoln's second inaugural address, in which he apologizes for American slavery : "two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil" enabling some to "wring their bread from the sweat of other men's faces." Just as breathtaking was the apology made by Kevin Gover, an assistant secretary of Indian affairs, for that agency's grave crimes against the Indian people. Lazare succeeds in showing that a true apology is among the most graceful and profound of all human exchanges. When it is sincere, it is not an end but a new beginning. "It is a behavior that requires of both parties an attitude of honesty, generosity, humility, commitment, and courage," he writes. Everybody on earth could benefit from this small but essential book.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
July 26, 2016
In this book, Aaron Lazare, M.D. takes a sustained look at one of humanity’s most needed interactions. Acutely aware of a world in which nations, institutions, and individuals exist in an interdependent global village, his message contains both a hopeful call and a warning sign. By providing specific examples of how nations and individuals have apologized for their offenses in the past, he offers the optimistic idea that offending parties have made an ongoing commitment to change their behavior to those they have offended. As apology is an important means of social and political conflict resolution and reconciliation, he also warns that the dangers of neglecting it are high. This is a good read for people both with political and personal interests in apology.
March 8, 2017
While interesting in places, I frequently found the book tedious. It would have been satisfying to see some discussion of apology in more complex situations in which there are power differentials--e.g. between parents and children, teachers and students, supervisors and workers. I also noticed a lack of good discussion about situations in which one person has to deliver a painful truth to another, which the recipient perceives as "hurtful" or "offensive" and for which the latter expects an apology. These kinds of nuanced situations are not addressed. And what about the person who constantly apologizes? Are there not times when apology is actually inappropriate?
September 14, 2010
I read this book sometime ago. As a Christian and a Pastor this book offered some very profound insights into reconciling relationships. We are forever touching other peoples lives in ways that may not always be the most congenial and because of misunderstanding, anger. and even our inability to find the right words at the right time. People hurt other people, even those we never mean to hurt and understanding the dynamics of making apologies in our lives is a very important part of human interaction. This is a great book to help!
November 5, 2016
I quite liked this book: it nicely flip-flops between personal and international events to detail the structure of apologies in various scenarios highlight exactly what worked or failed with various apologies. More of an academic study than a how-to guide but still a very easy read, I liked the parallels it began to draw between the legal system and religious parallels.
Overall I found it a bit too simplistic: I kind of felt it needed a chapter on 'It's complicated' where things can't be so easily termed 'offender', 'victim' and 'offence'.
Overall I found it a bit too simplistic: I kind of felt it needed a chapter on 'It's complicated' where things can't be so easily termed 'offender', 'victim' and 'offence'.
November 26, 2013
This is one of the FEW books that avoids biblical blathering and useless pop psychology.
It actually breaks down what makes apologies fail, and how to make apologies succeed. It allows the reader to analyze what's gone awry in broken situations, and possibly develop a plan of action to rectify.
i could have done w/o the parallel sections of public apologies. interesting, but most people read this because of broken relationships, is my guess.
It actually breaks down what makes apologies fail, and how to make apologies succeed. It allows the reader to analyze what's gone awry in broken situations, and possibly develop a plan of action to rectify.
i could have done w/o the parallel sections of public apologies. interesting, but most people read this because of broken relationships, is my guess.
April 7, 2008
Written by a Harvard Medical School professor, this book is a suprisingly light book celebrating the difficult human notion of the apology. He writes with grace and a sincere committment to keeping peace with one another, of which one of the chief tools is the apology. Quick read, and full of sincerity. I had only wished it had a little more theoretical depth.
November 18, 2012
I didn't finish it, because I needed to bring it back to the library and just didn't have the time to devote to it. I wouldn't mind trying to read it again, but too much was going on for me, and it was written a bit like a textbook. Since I was interested in the subject, it didn't seem boring, and I think I could learn from it, but now's not the time.
December 27, 2019
I went into this book with high expectations, and while there's plenty to be gleaned from Lazare's discussion of apologies and their uses, the analysis itself felt superficial to me and rooted in the author's preconceived biases. There's too much judgment, in my opinion, and not enough nuance. Oh well.
August 19, 2015
A great read for all. No matter what field of work you are in, this is a book that can be applied to all parts of your life. It's amazing how an apology can change your life...whether it comes from you or someone else.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 35 reviews