What do you think?
Rate this book
Calvary Chapel Distinctives
What makes Calvary Chapel Distinctive? It's always good to have a grasp of the distinctive work that God has done in our fellowship. If Calvary Chapel is exactly like the church across the street it would be better to simply merge the two. But, if there are qualities that make us different, then we have a unique and special place in the plan of God. Certainly there are churches that share many of our beliefs and practices. But God has done a wonderful work of balance in the Calvary Chapel movement that does make us different. Some churches believe in the gifts and ministry of the Holy Spirit, but don't have a strong emphasis on Biblical teaching. Others place strong emphasis on teaching the Word of God, but don't believe the gifts of the Spirit are available and valid today. In Calvary Chapel we value the teaching of the Word, and possess an open heart to the work of the Holy Spirit. This balance makes Calvary Chapel a distinct and uniquely blessed movement of God. And so, it's important to understand the Biblical principles that explain why God has allowed us to exist and grow.
160 pages, Paperback
First published June 1, 1993
33 people are currently reading
111 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 25 of 25 reviews
July 17, 2012
I am confident that Pastor Chuck Smith is a man of faith. He has done a lot to be a witness of Jesus Christ. Smith has a lot of great things to say in this book. Many of which I did not comment on in this review. Yet this book is also full of inconsistencies and misunderstandings. I comment on some of them, but my comments are by no means thorough. This is not a “professional” review, and so I have chosen oftentimes to be very brief in my critiques. Unless you are in some way involved in the Calvary Chapel ministry, then I see no reason why you should read this book (unless you're curious).
Introduction
Smith begins this book by writing an introduction on the importance of a minister recognizing he is “called” to the ministry. On page 3 Smith mentions 2 Peter 1:10, essentially exhorting the reader to make sure he is called to occupational ministry. Yet 2 Peter 1:10, as I understand it, is not referring to one’s calling to ministry, but to one’s calling to be saved.
His emphasis on leaders being servants who serve the Lord not to receive applause from men is excellent.
Chapter 1
In this chapter Smith emphasizes the Lord as the one who builds His church. He also discusses the importance of being led by the Spirit, being founded upon the Word of God, and being faithful to the flock the Lord has given to one’s care. As one does these, one can be confident that the Lord will build His church. Amen!
I agree with Smith’s distaste for churches’ emphasis on the number of congregants in their churches. Oftentimes this emphasis is fueled by the prideful desire to have a large church. Thus Smith says, “The trap of counting heads is a terrible snare to fall into. Don’t do it! Just look at those that are there and realize, ‘These are the ones that the Lord has brought for me to minister to today’” (italics original).
Counting heads is definitely evidence of pride, but not always! Leaders must know who they are held accountable for (cf. Heb. 13:17). Truly, shepherds ought to know their sheep and when their sheep are missing. Therefore, I believe it is paramount for churches to count heads. Yet this ought to be motivated by love for their flock, seeking to determine who is missing and who requires guidance back into the flock.
Smith’s last comment in the above quote seems to suggest the Pastor has no idea who his sheep are. He says clearly a pastor ought to be concerned only with the certain ones “the Lord has brought for me to minister to today.” Is Smith saying the Lord has random people for the pastor to minister to on any given Sunday, rather than a known flock of sheep? Jesus knows His sheep by name, ought a pastor know this as well? This is not to say random people don’t or can’t show up. They do! But a pastor still must know which are the specific flock given to his care by the Good Shepherd, Jesus.
Excellent: The Word of God was the top priority in the ministry of the early church, and thus ought to be our top priority. This priority is evidence of those who are totally surrendered to Jesus, not seeking their own glory, but seeking to bring glory to Jesus.
Chapter 2
I believe Smith should have elaborated more in his discussion on church government, specifically the different forms of church government. For example, he states both the Episcopal and Presbyterian churches present a valid case for their point of view, yet he claims the Congregationalist form of government has no case at all. On the contrary, they do have a case. I personally don’t agree with it, but they do have a case.
I also think he doesn’t treat Elder rule fairly (cf. page 25).
I believe Smith should have explained his teachings on such passages as 1 Tim 3 and Acts 14:23. Instead he just mentioned them as verses that have caused denominational divisions. It’s great that Smith looks to the Old Testament form of theocracy, with Moses as the main pastor who was aided by “elders” (cf. Ex. 18:13-27). Yet he does not explain how 1 Tim 3 and all the passages that refer to elders relate to the church. I would think he would have given such an explanation, considering the previous chapter he emphatically states we ought to look to the book of Acts to determine how things ought to be done within the church.
Nevertheless, I like his conclusion: “We believe that God’s model is that the pastor is ruled by the Lord and aided by the Elders to discover the mind and will of Jesus Christ for His church.”
Excellent: Smith’s discussion on the foolishness of arrogant confidence in our own abilities. Truly, we need the Holy Spirit at all times. We are totally reliant upon God.
Chapter 3
He begins this chapter claiming there is a “distinct and separate” event in the life of a believer when he/she becomes empowered by the Holy Spirit, as opposed to the initial indwelling of the Spirit at the time of salvation. I accept that the Holy Spirit empowers us throughout our lives as Christians even after being regenerated. I believe we are to be continually filled with the Holy Spirit. Yet to claim that an empowerment experience occurs separate from the initial indwelling seems to suggest that an empowerment does not occur simultaneously to the initial indwelling, which I believe is false. Although Smith believes the empowerment can occur concurrent to conversion (pg. 32), he clearly states his belief that the experience of the Holy Spirit coming upon someone is distinct from the Spirit dwelling with and in the believer at conversion. I disagree. I do not believe they are distinct events. One passage Smith cites to support his claims is Acts 19:2. This passage, however, seems to indicate the Ephesian people were not actually saved, for they only received the baptism of John (cf. also Acts 2:38; and Rom. 8:1). Moreover, the event described in this passage could not be a “distinct and separate” empowerment of the Holy Spirit that took place after the initial indwelling of the Holy Spirit, for the Ephesians openly admit they had not yet received the Holy Spirit.
Smith also cites Acts 8:15-16 as an example. Yet this too is unacceptable (see for example Grudem’s Systematic Theology, pgs. 773-74). Still other examples are briefly cited, all of which are unconvincing. Eventually, he cites Pentecost, which cannot be applied to believers’ today. Pentecost was a one-time experience unique to that time in history when the Lord first sent His Spirit. This event marked the transitional period from the time prior to the giving of the Holy Spirit.
Smith says, “When anyone invites Jesus to come into his heart, to take over the rule and control of his life, we believe that the Holy Spirit then comes into that person’s life.”
Instead, I would say the Holy Spirit first indwells a person, thus regenerating the person (giving life to their dead soul), which enables the individual to put his/her faith in Jesus and to repent of sin.
Chapter 4
Excellent: God will build His church. We are simply to be faithful to tend and care for His sheep. We are not to worry. He will build it.
I definitely agree that churches ought not to be into “carnal pursuit of new programs or spiritual hype to try to appeal to people. It’s the Word of God that we trust in, that we teach, that we rely on. It’s the foundation upon which we are built. It’s inexhaustible. There’s no burnout with it. It just keeps going on and on and on.”
Smith says Calvary Chapel’s are “relaxed” and “casual.” This is fine, but he does not define what “relaxed” and “casual” is. This leads one confused, thinking churches that don’t fit into our understanding of “relaxed” and “casual” aren’t reliant upon Jesus to build His church. I believe churches that aren’t “relaxed” or “casual” can also be reliant on Jesus to build His church.
Chapter 5
Excellent: Not works of righteousness, but by God’s grace we are saved. Amen.
I appreciate Smith’s desire to “restore” ministers who have fallen. God’s grace is definitely beautiful to forgive anyone—even ministers—when they fall into sin.
Sadly, Smith seems to equate Reformation Theology with legalism. Granted, he does suggest this equation is not always true, but, he says, it is usually true. He admits “Reformation Theology” has some good points, yet jests by saying “so does a porcupine.” This is sad, because if there is any theological system that promotes grace, it’s Reformation Theology! Hence what it teaches is known as the Doctrines of Grace. I think, perhaps, Smith is confusing legalism with Reformation Theology’s seriousness for holiness!
Interestingly enough, Smith claims people are correct that he glosses over certain “controversial” passages. This is sad that he glosses over such passages. Why would anyone gloss over a passage that teaches a truth that God has revealed to us? It’s also surprising that Smith would gloss over passages considering his wonderful emphasis on declaring the whole counsel of God so as not to avoid controversial issues (chapter 6).
Even more interesting is that the chapter before this Smith emphasizes God’s role as the one who builds His church, and the ministers’ role is to be faithful to tend to His sheep. Yet Smith ends this chapter with a marketing strategy to bring people into the church by refraining from attaching “Baptist” or “Presbyterian” or “Nazarene” to the Calvary Chapel name. He suggests keeping the simple name “Calvary Chapel” is a great way to bring people in to the church. His main point, however, is that “people don’t really know where [Calvary Chapel] stands” on issues such as Calvinism and Ariminianism. This may be true based on the name alone. Yet those who know Calvary Chapel know that they are definitely against Calvinism (contra Smith’s claim that they like to keep a balanced approach in chapter 11).
Chapter 6
As I mentioned earlier, the Calvary Chapel approach to teaching the Word of God is to declare the whole counsel of God. This is done by teaching verse-by-verse in an “expositional style.” This is absolutely wonderful!
Chapter 7
Excellent: Jesus Christ is the center of CC’s worship. Yet curious that Smith claims they “don’t allow people to stand up individually when we’re singing in the church,” as this distracts others around them (he’s referring to the CC he pastors in Costa Mesa, for he admits other CC’s allow this on page 58). I understand how someone standing can be a distraction, but I believe one who is truly engaged in worship would immediately refocus his/her attention on the Lord. Indeed, it excites me to see others stand individually, because it tells me they are excited about worshiping the Lord. I think it’s sad that Smith thinks one who stands and raises his/her hands and sways is doing so in order to gain attention. Granted, perhaps people have done this in the past; but bad examples do not mean all examples are bad! That’s like saying all pastors are power hungry because some have proven themselves to be power hungry.
Smith claims such distractions of people standing individually during worship is dangerous because it may cause you to lose “prospective members” of the church. This seems contradictory to his commitment to trust in the Lord to build His church. Even more shocking is Smith’s comment to a CC pastor who allowed a man to do such “distractions.” The pastor defended his desire to allow this man to be a so-called distraction, and Smith thought to himself, “All right, stay small!” Wow! Such a comment is basically accusing the pastor as the cause for staying a small church. Yet if Jesus is the one who builds His church, then nothing the pastor does or does not do will hinder growth if that’s Jesus’ desire.
Please understand that I appreciate Smith’s desire not to distract people from Jesus. There are definitely things that will distract me! I just don’t understand how a person standing individually can be such a distraction.
Chapter 8
Smith introduces this chapter on the Rapture by claiming pastors have no excuse for choosing not to take a position on the rapture. This makes me wonder why Smith claims essentially in chapter 11 that he doesn’t want to take a position on Arminianism vs. Calvinism (although he does in fact take a position simply by approving of those Calvary Chapel pastors who adamantly oppose Calvinism, and by approving those Calvary Chapel pastors who wholeheartedly embrace Arminianism).
Smith’s exposition of Revelation is wanting, in my opinion. His explanation of Enoch, Noah, Lot and Daniel being types of the church is unconvincing.
Chapter 9
Definitely a great chapter on relying on the Holy Spirit. The faith begins with/in the Spirit, and we cannot continue/end with the flesh.
Smith admits to being guilty of being an anti-intellectual. This is unfortunate, and ironic considering Calvary Chapel has a college in Murietta, CA. I definitely agree with Smith that “true wisdom … comes from the Holy Spirit” (pg. 99). Yet the Holy Spirit isn’t limited to teach that wisdom outside of universities.
Smith claims the title Doctor “puts a wall between you and the people.” This may be true at times. Yet each of the professors at my alma mater (The Master’s College) had doctorate degrees, and they all had the most caring and tender shepherd’s hearts. I never felt a wall of separation from them as Smith suggests; only a proper respect for their position of authority, which I also have for a pastor with no college degree.
Essentially, it seems Smith is erroneously equating college education with trying to be made perfect in the flesh (Gal. 3:3), which is just wrong. I’m not saying no one has ever pursued an education with faulty motives. I am saying one cannot equate education with being perfected in the flesh.
Chapter 10
Wonderful having a chapter on love. Lots of good things said in this chapter. I’m not sure, however, if it’s correct to say “God’s supreme desire for us is that we experience His love…” (pg. 102). Truly He desires this, but I’m not sure if it’s His “supreme” desire. In fact, I would perhaps say His supreme desire is for us to have and be satisfied in eternal life, which Jesus defines as knowing Him (Jn. 17:3); and knowing Him includes experiencing His love and holiness, righteousness, justice, sovereignty, glory etc. etc.
Chapter 11
This chapter elaborates on the “important characteristic of the Calvary Chapel Fellowship” of not dividing God’s people over non-essentials. I agree it is indeed important not to be divided over non-essentials. Yet it is very important to do our best to understand and teach sound doctrine.
In this chapter Smith claims CC’s are not Five Point Calvinists, nor Arminian. They believe in the security of the believer. Great! Yet I’m confused because he gives the impression that there is the possibility that a believer (or “saint”) won’t necessarily persevere: he says, “We don’t believe that because you are a saint you will necessarily persevere, but that you need to persevere because you’re a saint.” This seems contradictory to me. I also do not believe Smith’s interpretations of John 8:31 and John 15:6-7 are correct. His interpretations here (and elsewhere) seem to be more based upon what is linguistically possible in the text as opposed to authorial intent. Authorial intent trumps whatever is linguistically possible.
Well personally I believe a saint will necessarily persevere, because God enables him/her to do so.
I pretty much disagree with everything Smith has against Calvinism. What I find curious, however, is that Smith claims he will argue either side of the debate “ad infinitum” because he believes the Scripture support both. Tell me why, then, Mr. Smith, do Calvary Chapel pastors argue adamantly against Calvinism and never against Arminianism? And why does Smith approve of Pastor Brian Brodersen’s comments about Calvinists being like cultists, and that all of the Five Points have issues?
I appreciate Smith’s desire not to cause division, but the CC stance against Calvinism has caused division.
Chapter 12
This is a great chapter on the necessity and joy in walking by faith, being led by God to accomplish His will in our lives. I’m not too sure, however, what exactly it means to “give God a chance.” That sounds strange, like we are able to give God permission to try something out. I’m confident that is not Smith’s intention, it’s just a weird way of communicating his intention.
Introduction
Smith begins this book by writing an introduction on the importance of a minister recognizing he is “called” to the ministry. On page 3 Smith mentions 2 Peter 1:10, essentially exhorting the reader to make sure he is called to occupational ministry. Yet 2 Peter 1:10, as I understand it, is not referring to one’s calling to ministry, but to one’s calling to be saved.
His emphasis on leaders being servants who serve the Lord not to receive applause from men is excellent.
Chapter 1
In this chapter Smith emphasizes the Lord as the one who builds His church. He also discusses the importance of being led by the Spirit, being founded upon the Word of God, and being faithful to the flock the Lord has given to one’s care. As one does these, one can be confident that the Lord will build His church. Amen!
I agree with Smith’s distaste for churches’ emphasis on the number of congregants in their churches. Oftentimes this emphasis is fueled by the prideful desire to have a large church. Thus Smith says, “The trap of counting heads is a terrible snare to fall into. Don’t do it! Just look at those that are there and realize, ‘These are the ones that the Lord has brought for me to minister to today’” (italics original).
Counting heads is definitely evidence of pride, but not always! Leaders must know who they are held accountable for (cf. Heb. 13:17). Truly, shepherds ought to know their sheep and when their sheep are missing. Therefore, I believe it is paramount for churches to count heads. Yet this ought to be motivated by love for their flock, seeking to determine who is missing and who requires guidance back into the flock.
Smith’s last comment in the above quote seems to suggest the Pastor has no idea who his sheep are. He says clearly a pastor ought to be concerned only with the certain ones “the Lord has brought for me to minister to today.” Is Smith saying the Lord has random people for the pastor to minister to on any given Sunday, rather than a known flock of sheep? Jesus knows His sheep by name, ought a pastor know this as well? This is not to say random people don’t or can’t show up. They do! But a pastor still must know which are the specific flock given to his care by the Good Shepherd, Jesus.
Excellent: The Word of God was the top priority in the ministry of the early church, and thus ought to be our top priority. This priority is evidence of those who are totally surrendered to Jesus, not seeking their own glory, but seeking to bring glory to Jesus.
Chapter 2
I believe Smith should have elaborated more in his discussion on church government, specifically the different forms of church government. For example, he states both the Episcopal and Presbyterian churches present a valid case for their point of view, yet he claims the Congregationalist form of government has no case at all. On the contrary, they do have a case. I personally don’t agree with it, but they do have a case.
I also think he doesn’t treat Elder rule fairly (cf. page 25).
I believe Smith should have explained his teachings on such passages as 1 Tim 3 and Acts 14:23. Instead he just mentioned them as verses that have caused denominational divisions. It’s great that Smith looks to the Old Testament form of theocracy, with Moses as the main pastor who was aided by “elders” (cf. Ex. 18:13-27). Yet he does not explain how 1 Tim 3 and all the passages that refer to elders relate to the church. I would think he would have given such an explanation, considering the previous chapter he emphatically states we ought to look to the book of Acts to determine how things ought to be done within the church.
Nevertheless, I like his conclusion: “We believe that God’s model is that the pastor is ruled by the Lord and aided by the Elders to discover the mind and will of Jesus Christ for His church.”
Excellent: Smith’s discussion on the foolishness of arrogant confidence in our own abilities. Truly, we need the Holy Spirit at all times. We are totally reliant upon God.
Chapter 3
He begins this chapter claiming there is a “distinct and separate” event in the life of a believer when he/she becomes empowered by the Holy Spirit, as opposed to the initial indwelling of the Spirit at the time of salvation. I accept that the Holy Spirit empowers us throughout our lives as Christians even after being regenerated. I believe we are to be continually filled with the Holy Spirit. Yet to claim that an empowerment experience occurs separate from the initial indwelling seems to suggest that an empowerment does not occur simultaneously to the initial indwelling, which I believe is false. Although Smith believes the empowerment can occur concurrent to conversion (pg. 32), he clearly states his belief that the experience of the Holy Spirit coming upon someone is distinct from the Spirit dwelling with and in the believer at conversion. I disagree. I do not believe they are distinct events. One passage Smith cites to support his claims is Acts 19:2. This passage, however, seems to indicate the Ephesian people were not actually saved, for they only received the baptism of John (cf. also Acts 2:38; and Rom. 8:1). Moreover, the event described in this passage could not be a “distinct and separate” empowerment of the Holy Spirit that took place after the initial indwelling of the Holy Spirit, for the Ephesians openly admit they had not yet received the Holy Spirit.
Smith also cites Acts 8:15-16 as an example. Yet this too is unacceptable (see for example Grudem’s Systematic Theology, pgs. 773-74). Still other examples are briefly cited, all of which are unconvincing. Eventually, he cites Pentecost, which cannot be applied to believers’ today. Pentecost was a one-time experience unique to that time in history when the Lord first sent His Spirit. This event marked the transitional period from the time prior to the giving of the Holy Spirit.
Smith says, “When anyone invites Jesus to come into his heart, to take over the rule and control of his life, we believe that the Holy Spirit then comes into that person’s life.”
Instead, I would say the Holy Spirit first indwells a person, thus regenerating the person (giving life to their dead soul), which enables the individual to put his/her faith in Jesus and to repent of sin.
Chapter 4
Excellent: God will build His church. We are simply to be faithful to tend and care for His sheep. We are not to worry. He will build it.
I definitely agree that churches ought not to be into “carnal pursuit of new programs or spiritual hype to try to appeal to people. It’s the Word of God that we trust in, that we teach, that we rely on. It’s the foundation upon which we are built. It’s inexhaustible. There’s no burnout with it. It just keeps going on and on and on.”
Smith says Calvary Chapel’s are “relaxed” and “casual.” This is fine, but he does not define what “relaxed” and “casual” is. This leads one confused, thinking churches that don’t fit into our understanding of “relaxed” and “casual” aren’t reliant upon Jesus to build His church. I believe churches that aren’t “relaxed” or “casual” can also be reliant on Jesus to build His church.
Chapter 5
Excellent: Not works of righteousness, but by God’s grace we are saved. Amen.
I appreciate Smith’s desire to “restore” ministers who have fallen. God’s grace is definitely beautiful to forgive anyone—even ministers—when they fall into sin.
Sadly, Smith seems to equate Reformation Theology with legalism. Granted, he does suggest this equation is not always true, but, he says, it is usually true. He admits “Reformation Theology” has some good points, yet jests by saying “so does a porcupine.” This is sad, because if there is any theological system that promotes grace, it’s Reformation Theology! Hence what it teaches is known as the Doctrines of Grace. I think, perhaps, Smith is confusing legalism with Reformation Theology’s seriousness for holiness!
Interestingly enough, Smith claims people are correct that he glosses over certain “controversial” passages. This is sad that he glosses over such passages. Why would anyone gloss over a passage that teaches a truth that God has revealed to us? It’s also surprising that Smith would gloss over passages considering his wonderful emphasis on declaring the whole counsel of God so as not to avoid controversial issues (chapter 6).
Even more interesting is that the chapter before this Smith emphasizes God’s role as the one who builds His church, and the ministers’ role is to be faithful to tend to His sheep. Yet Smith ends this chapter with a marketing strategy to bring people into the church by refraining from attaching “Baptist” or “Presbyterian” or “Nazarene” to the Calvary Chapel name. He suggests keeping the simple name “Calvary Chapel” is a great way to bring people in to the church. His main point, however, is that “people don’t really know where [Calvary Chapel] stands” on issues such as Calvinism and Ariminianism. This may be true based on the name alone. Yet those who know Calvary Chapel know that they are definitely against Calvinism (contra Smith’s claim that they like to keep a balanced approach in chapter 11).
Chapter 6
As I mentioned earlier, the Calvary Chapel approach to teaching the Word of God is to declare the whole counsel of God. This is done by teaching verse-by-verse in an “expositional style.” This is absolutely wonderful!
Chapter 7
Excellent: Jesus Christ is the center of CC’s worship. Yet curious that Smith claims they “don’t allow people to stand up individually when we’re singing in the church,” as this distracts others around them (he’s referring to the CC he pastors in Costa Mesa, for he admits other CC’s allow this on page 58). I understand how someone standing can be a distraction, but I believe one who is truly engaged in worship would immediately refocus his/her attention on the Lord. Indeed, it excites me to see others stand individually, because it tells me they are excited about worshiping the Lord. I think it’s sad that Smith thinks one who stands and raises his/her hands and sways is doing so in order to gain attention. Granted, perhaps people have done this in the past; but bad examples do not mean all examples are bad! That’s like saying all pastors are power hungry because some have proven themselves to be power hungry.
Smith claims such distractions of people standing individually during worship is dangerous because it may cause you to lose “prospective members” of the church. This seems contradictory to his commitment to trust in the Lord to build His church. Even more shocking is Smith’s comment to a CC pastor who allowed a man to do such “distractions.” The pastor defended his desire to allow this man to be a so-called distraction, and Smith thought to himself, “All right, stay small!” Wow! Such a comment is basically accusing the pastor as the cause for staying a small church. Yet if Jesus is the one who builds His church, then nothing the pastor does or does not do will hinder growth if that’s Jesus’ desire.
Please understand that I appreciate Smith’s desire not to distract people from Jesus. There are definitely things that will distract me! I just don’t understand how a person standing individually can be such a distraction.
Chapter 8
Smith introduces this chapter on the Rapture by claiming pastors have no excuse for choosing not to take a position on the rapture. This makes me wonder why Smith claims essentially in chapter 11 that he doesn’t want to take a position on Arminianism vs. Calvinism (although he does in fact take a position simply by approving of those Calvary Chapel pastors who adamantly oppose Calvinism, and by approving those Calvary Chapel pastors who wholeheartedly embrace Arminianism).
Smith’s exposition of Revelation is wanting, in my opinion. His explanation of Enoch, Noah, Lot and Daniel being types of the church is unconvincing.
Chapter 9
Definitely a great chapter on relying on the Holy Spirit. The faith begins with/in the Spirit, and we cannot continue/end with the flesh.
Smith admits to being guilty of being an anti-intellectual. This is unfortunate, and ironic considering Calvary Chapel has a college in Murietta, CA. I definitely agree with Smith that “true wisdom … comes from the Holy Spirit” (pg. 99). Yet the Holy Spirit isn’t limited to teach that wisdom outside of universities.
Smith claims the title Doctor “puts a wall between you and the people.” This may be true at times. Yet each of the professors at my alma mater (The Master’s College) had doctorate degrees, and they all had the most caring and tender shepherd’s hearts. I never felt a wall of separation from them as Smith suggests; only a proper respect for their position of authority, which I also have for a pastor with no college degree.
Essentially, it seems Smith is erroneously equating college education with trying to be made perfect in the flesh (Gal. 3:3), which is just wrong. I’m not saying no one has ever pursued an education with faulty motives. I am saying one cannot equate education with being perfected in the flesh.
Chapter 10
Wonderful having a chapter on love. Lots of good things said in this chapter. I’m not sure, however, if it’s correct to say “God’s supreme desire for us is that we experience His love…” (pg. 102). Truly He desires this, but I’m not sure if it’s His “supreme” desire. In fact, I would perhaps say His supreme desire is for us to have and be satisfied in eternal life, which Jesus defines as knowing Him (Jn. 17:3); and knowing Him includes experiencing His love and holiness, righteousness, justice, sovereignty, glory etc. etc.
Chapter 11
This chapter elaborates on the “important characteristic of the Calvary Chapel Fellowship” of not dividing God’s people over non-essentials. I agree it is indeed important not to be divided over non-essentials. Yet it is very important to do our best to understand and teach sound doctrine.
In this chapter Smith claims CC’s are not Five Point Calvinists, nor Arminian. They believe in the security of the believer. Great! Yet I’m confused because he gives the impression that there is the possibility that a believer (or “saint”) won’t necessarily persevere: he says, “We don’t believe that because you are a saint you will necessarily persevere, but that you need to persevere because you’re a saint.” This seems contradictory to me. I also do not believe Smith’s interpretations of John 8:31 and John 15:6-7 are correct. His interpretations here (and elsewhere) seem to be more based upon what is linguistically possible in the text as opposed to authorial intent. Authorial intent trumps whatever is linguistically possible.
Well personally I believe a saint will necessarily persevere, because God enables him/her to do so.
I pretty much disagree with everything Smith has against Calvinism. What I find curious, however, is that Smith claims he will argue either side of the debate “ad infinitum” because he believes the Scripture support both. Tell me why, then, Mr. Smith, do Calvary Chapel pastors argue adamantly against Calvinism and never against Arminianism? And why does Smith approve of Pastor Brian Brodersen’s comments about Calvinists being like cultists, and that all of the Five Points have issues?
I appreciate Smith’s desire not to cause division, but the CC stance against Calvinism has caused division.
Chapter 12
This is a great chapter on the necessity and joy in walking by faith, being led by God to accomplish His will in our lives. I’m not too sure, however, what exactly it means to “give God a chance.” That sounds strange, like we are able to give God permission to try something out. I’m confident that is not Smith’s intention, it’s just a weird way of communicating his intention.
May 9, 2012
Even if you aren't in a Calvary Chapel church, this book really calls attention to some very common sense ideas which I believed simplify the church. Big issues are tackled such as "once-saved-always-saved" theology, man's responsibility vs. God's sovereignty, the working of the Holy Spirit in the modern church, the formation of church government, church finances, and operating by faith. I definitely recommend reading it. It was my 3rd read and it was great to go back through it again.
April 14, 2024
My pastor asked my husband and I to read this and I’m torn on how to rate this book. On one hand I think it should be held to a VERY high standard but on the other hand looking at it from an eternal perspective, the contents are much more edifying than just your average book.
I didn’t take notes and read it over a period of a few weeks so I don’t have specifics. But I definitely was shaking my head a lot, especially at the beginning. From what I remember, I don’t think he makes a fair case for church government. I think the case he made against taking church attendance is a reaction to a very specific yet not prolific problem and generally is not good advice. I disagreed with some of his beliefs on the Holy Spirit and conversion. There was a lot more I disagreed with but also a lot I did agree with. But in the end, I know he has done great things for Gods kingdom through Calvary Chapel.
I didn’t take notes and read it over a period of a few weeks so I don’t have specifics. But I definitely was shaking my head a lot, especially at the beginning. From what I remember, I don’t think he makes a fair case for church government. I think the case he made against taking church attendance is a reaction to a very specific yet not prolific problem and generally is not good advice. I disagreed with some of his beliefs on the Holy Spirit and conversion. There was a lot more I disagreed with but also a lot I did agree with. But in the end, I know he has done great things for Gods kingdom through Calvary Chapel.
February 27, 2025
Some of the wording in this book is pretty bad
March 26, 2014
"Calvary Chapel Distinctives" by Pastor Chuck Smith is an amazingly frank discussion of what makes the Calvary Chapel "denomination" different from others. I was given a copy of this book by the Pastor of the Calvary Chapel I recently started attending, and as I read through it I found myself frequently pumping my fist and shouting "YES", that's how it should be!
I am not trying to proselytize here, but I have heard folks refer to Calvary Chapel as a cult, and nothing could be further from the truth. Calvary Chapel is based on the model of the early church, as defined in the book of Acts. Their worship services consist of a wonderful mix of contemporary and traditional praise and worship songs, and "simply teaching the Word of God simply". In other words, they go through the Bible from beginning to end, and teach people what God is saying.
Anybody who does not understand what Calvary Chapel is about, or anybody who believes it is some kind of cult, must read this book. Pastor Chuck cuts no corners, nor does he pull any punches. He tells it like it is, and the love of Christ pours out from this book, just as the love of Christ poured out of Pastor Chuck before his recent passing. He advises, and Calvary Chapel teaches, the whole counsel of God, through His Word, the Bible. I most definitely recommend this book for all who may be wondering about the new church in town that seems to be growing by leaps and bounds.
I am not trying to proselytize here, but I have heard folks refer to Calvary Chapel as a cult, and nothing could be further from the truth. Calvary Chapel is based on the model of the early church, as defined in the book of Acts. Their worship services consist of a wonderful mix of contemporary and traditional praise and worship songs, and "simply teaching the Word of God simply". In other words, they go through the Bible from beginning to end, and teach people what God is saying.
Anybody who does not understand what Calvary Chapel is about, or anybody who believes it is some kind of cult, must read this book. Pastor Chuck cuts no corners, nor does he pull any punches. He tells it like it is, and the love of Christ pours out from this book, just as the love of Christ poured out of Pastor Chuck before his recent passing. He advises, and Calvary Chapel teaches, the whole counsel of God, through His Word, the Bible. I most definitely recommend this book for all who may be wondering about the new church in town that seems to be growing by leaps and bounds.
August 21, 2011
Another 'non-denominational' denomination's book on why they are more 'biblical' than your denomination. Poor arguments for a so-called 'Moses Model' of church government and how it is more biblical than your church's from of government. The largest chapter in this denominational propaganda is focused on the denomination's probably most cherished and defended pet doctrine known as the "Pre Trib Rapture"...and of course poorly argued at that. :(
Read
July 25, 2011I finally got around to reading this. I liked it, and it reminded me why I am a Calvary Chapel guy. It isn't the only valid way to "do church," but I really think Chuck Smith's vision for church life is both true to the Word of God, and flexible enough for the Holy Spirit to move in unique ways even among different Calvary Chapels.
February 16, 2012
Wait. I thought Calvary didn't like divisions? Why be distinctive? This is the Calvary Chapel confession of faith.
August 30, 2024
Don't let what starts in the Spirit be perfected by the flesh.
September 28, 2022
I’ve been going to Calvary Chapel Murrieta for 10 years. It was my childhood church, if you go on their website I can tell you a story about almost half the current serving team when this review was written. Then there was a season of church hopping, but all the churches I visited were almost the same: it was the Calvary Chapel “distinctives” almost everywhere you went. Riverside county is a charismatic place, though no one would insist upon using those words. Chuck Smith dedicated a whole chapter about why being non-denominational is important, why the Holy Spirit is important, why synced worship is important, why pre-millennial and pre-tribulation are important (the longest chapter in the book btw), and why programs to grow the church are evil and stink of the world. After you read all these chapters, you scratch your head. Why are they that important Chuck? Why is this the hill to be crucified on?
When I left Calvary Chapel Murrieta, it wasn't till 12 years later, while learning about the different denominations, I discovered the Calvary Chapel acts like a charismatic church.
So here I am reading Chuck Smith, to see what he says he his, to see what my experiences have been, and then where they are leading.
This book has not aged well. Chuck did not write it well to stand the test of time- it is a collection of mini sermons with scripture and antidotes- and his own passion is a far cry from how Calvary Murrieta has been, for the better. Then there are major theological and application differences I myself have with the book: specifically his stories of him fighting for a zero distraction worship service and classroom. This is fine on its own, but the strong man policy of enforcement was not comfortable to read. Also his poor straw man argument against other church governments is based on, in my opinion, a poor reading of the Old Testament.
In the end, the first five chapters of this book and introduction/preface are worth reading. It reminds the reader of what a central church vision should look like, after those chapters I would say the “Chuck Smith” Distinctives show there head more. There isn’t a heretical thought among them, but the distinctions show how strong leadership and pastoring intersect in leading a congregation. This is how Chuck wanted to lead, it frame work did me good, though I was never pastored by him and I’m glad I wasn’t.
Yet the people that pastored me where influenced by the Calvary Chapel "distinctives". I have attended about four different small churches since then, and three of them were basically mini Calvary Chapel in doctrine. These non-denominational churches are the biggest contradictions in name, this book shows it. Any conversation this book would create in a small group would show it. It will show where our heart is on doctrine, grace, and truth: and it will be just as broken as this book.
So now I’m beginning to see my own distinctions. Seeing Baptism and Communion more then symbolism, how amazing Calvin and Aquinas is, and what God church leadership actually is. The hardest thing is interacting with that old crowd, those who do not have the same distinctions but the same dogma as me.
The greatest weakness of this book is that it's only advice in those sections are: "this is what works for us, if you don't like it go to another church that practices what you need". While this in theory is true, it will encourage a consumerism of Church as a service, and not a place of worship. It shows the heart of church going in Riverside and it will show many we need to read stronger books. Till then, it's just me and my distinctives, and not grace, having a stare off.
The Philosophy Of Ministry of Calvary Chapel is the better read, thought it has the same underlying problem.
When I left Calvary Chapel Murrieta, it wasn't till 12 years later, while learning about the different denominations, I discovered the Calvary Chapel acts like a charismatic church.
So here I am reading Chuck Smith, to see what he says he his, to see what my experiences have been, and then where they are leading.
This book has not aged well. Chuck did not write it well to stand the test of time- it is a collection of mini sermons with scripture and antidotes- and his own passion is a far cry from how Calvary Murrieta has been, for the better. Then there are major theological and application differences I myself have with the book: specifically his stories of him fighting for a zero distraction worship service and classroom. This is fine on its own, but the strong man policy of enforcement was not comfortable to read. Also his poor straw man argument against other church governments is based on, in my opinion, a poor reading of the Old Testament.
In the end, the first five chapters of this book and introduction/preface are worth reading. It reminds the reader of what a central church vision should look like, after those chapters I would say the “Chuck Smith” Distinctives show there head more. There isn’t a heretical thought among them, but the distinctions show how strong leadership and pastoring intersect in leading a congregation. This is how Chuck wanted to lead, it frame work did me good, though I was never pastored by him and I’m glad I wasn’t.
Yet the people that pastored me where influenced by the Calvary Chapel "distinctives". I have attended about four different small churches since then, and three of them were basically mini Calvary Chapel in doctrine. These non-denominational churches are the biggest contradictions in name, this book shows it. Any conversation this book would create in a small group would show it. It will show where our heart is on doctrine, grace, and truth: and it will be just as broken as this book.
So now I’m beginning to see my own distinctions. Seeing Baptism and Communion more then symbolism, how amazing Calvin and Aquinas is, and what God church leadership actually is. The hardest thing is interacting with that old crowd, those who do not have the same distinctions but the same dogma as me.
The greatest weakness of this book is that it's only advice in those sections are: "this is what works for us, if you don't like it go to another church that practices what you need". While this in theory is true, it will encourage a consumerism of Church as a service, and not a place of worship. It shows the heart of church going in Riverside and it will show many we need to read stronger books. Till then, it's just me and my distinctives, and not grace, having a stare off.
The Philosophy Of Ministry of Calvary Chapel is the better read, thought it has the same underlying problem.
May 20, 2015
Very good, and very simple (maybe too simple for some) about what makes Calvary different.
I like this and agree with most of it.
Chuck was pretty anti-standing in church and would remove people from meetings to warn them about how standing is bad... The principle behind it, drawing attention from Christ to yourself, makes a lot of sense.
Also, he spends a little too much time on the Rapture, but that makes sense cos he did predict it would happen in 1984 [before I was born haha].
Those are the only two issues I have with a book about how a church should be run! [If I ran the zoo]
I love his explanation of the Baptism of the Holy Spirit, best I've heard. I love the balance between the Spirit and the Word, I love the way/when Calvary encourages certain Spiritual gifts to be used.
I don't know if you can recommend reading a book like this, if you are in a Calvary then I guess why not, if you are thinking of running a Calvary then I guess it makes sense. If you are not it probably would be of no interest to you really [you know, unless you want to know what that weird church down the road believes...?]
I like this and agree with most of it.
Chuck was pretty anti-standing in church and would remove people from meetings to warn them about how standing is bad... The principle behind it, drawing attention from Christ to yourself, makes a lot of sense.
Also, he spends a little too much time on the Rapture, but that makes sense cos he did predict it would happen in 1984 [before I was born haha].
Those are the only two issues I have with a book about how a church should be run! [If I ran the zoo]
I love his explanation of the Baptism of the Holy Spirit, best I've heard. I love the balance between the Spirit and the Word, I love the way/when Calvary encourages certain Spiritual gifts to be used.
I don't know if you can recommend reading a book like this, if you are in a Calvary then I guess why not, if you are thinking of running a Calvary then I guess it makes sense. If you are not it probably would be of no interest to you really [you know, unless you want to know what that weird church down the road believes...?]
January 8, 2024
I'm arguably not the target audience for this book being that I'm not a member of Calvary Chapel. I don't align with all their beliefs and I wouldn't be a good fit in their church model. That being said, I thought it was well written and gave me a decent understanding of their beliefs and the way their church operates. I respect the late Chuck Smith and believe God used him and continues to use Calvary Chapel to reach people for Christ.
February 23, 2008
I will always be thankful for this book because the Lord used it to teach me about the Holy Spirit. :)
April 25, 2015
Honest and excellent description of the evangelical movement.
June 25, 2022
I was very happy to be given this book at a celebration even at my church. I did not know it existed and it has helped me understand a variety of things. I began attending this church in 2015 when I stopped attending a church I was a member of. It worked for me in the very beginning of my faith (2009) and then as I matured in my faith and began reading / studying the Bible I realized that it was more about entertaining the "audience" than it was about being Biblical. The more I studied the more I knew I needed to find a Biblical church. I am very thankful I have. Over time I've heard of the "Jesus Movement" from the 60's and 70's but did not know anything more. I appreciate the "distinctives" contained in Calvary Chapel and will continue seeking the Lord . . . Biblically.
January 25, 2022
Chuck Smiths keys to doing it Gods Way!
I have planted two churches in my 35 years in the ministry. My only regret is that rather than doing it independently I wish I would have connected with the Calvary Chapel group. Pastor Chuck has hit the nail on the head, “preach the Word” and listen to God for His direction. Don’t get trapped in the “church growth” movement. God Will grow the church.
I have planted two churches in my 35 years in the ministry. My only regret is that rather than doing it independently I wish I would have connected with the Calvary Chapel group. Pastor Chuck has hit the nail on the head, “preach the Word” and listen to God for His direction. Don’t get trapped in the “church growth” movement. God Will grow the church.
February 16, 2023
This gem is a quick read at 135 pages, but do not sit down with it unless you have a journal, sticky notes, and a pen. I only had sticky notes and easily tagged 34 golden nuggets. Upon completing the book, I then saw the 5-page notes section in the back of the book. Now, I'm even more excited to see the Jesus Revolution coming out next week!
Read
September 8, 2020Originally I gave this title 4 stars. I am revising my stars to zero.
The reason I am doing so is that since reading this title, several things about my faith journey and expression have changed and I no longer subscribe to evangelical ideologies.
The reason I am doing so is that since reading this title, several things about my faith journey and expression have changed and I no longer subscribe to evangelical ideologies.
December 27, 2024
Informative about the movement but gives rules about a denomination rather than scripture. They use scripture to support their ideas of how Calvary Chapel churches should be ran, but not my cup of tea.
February 19, 2020
A book you musy read to have a wide perspective on what faith means
November 26, 2020
Recommended by a friend.
April 7, 2024
Basic overview of what Chuck Smith aimed for the Calvary Chapel movement to be. Far from exhaustive, but clear and concise.
June 17, 2024
Though Calvary Chapel has done lots of good, I was surprised to read of how sloppy this book was theologically.
Here in Murrieta as one of the main areas for CC churches, I was sadly disappointed with this book.
The main beneficial parts were trusting God to bring the increase as your preach and to not make secondary issues core issues.
Here in Murrieta as one of the main areas for CC churches, I was sadly disappointed with this book.
The main beneficial parts were trusting God to bring the increase as your preach and to not make secondary issues core issues.
January 30, 2025
a simple, straightforward view of Calvary Chapel and our general beliefs. by no means an in-depth study, just the basics. but that's true to Chuck's style.
June 15, 2023
Defenitly will be reading again, was blessed and encouraged. Been attending Calvary for years and really was neat to see how Chuck spoke the same way I've always thought. Now I know why I always feel at home with Calvary brothers and sisters.
Displaying 1 - 25 of 25 reviews