Bosch’s work, Transforming Mission, came at a transitional period in South Africa. Paradigms were shifting: it was published in 1991 between the release of Nelson Mandela in 1990 and three years before the end of legislative Apartheid in 1994.
It is worth noting that Transforming Mission was larger in scope than merely South Africa. Although Bosch was a staunch critic of Apartheid, his theological investment was largely global in scope rather than local. He traveled far and wide and dealt with the global state of mission by propounding a dialectical tension between evangelicalism and ecumenicalism (Nassbaum, 2005, pp. 4-5). As mentioned in the prior section, the transition that South Africa was undergoing was a micro-expression of a global transition (or paradigm shift) that was in motion. This however was a strength which placed Transforming Mission on the global required reading list.
On the idea of transition it is worth noting that the thread that holds Transforming Mission together, is Thomas Kuhn’s (1962) theory of paradigm shifts. Bosch uses this theory throughout his book to demonstrate how the conception and praxis of mission have evolved over the past two thousand years of Christian missionary history, and how his book was being authored in the midst of another global shift. The conception of paradigm shifts provides him with brackets in time to locate transformative developments in the thought and practice in the history of the church’s mission. (Bosch, 1991, pp. 183-185).
Another key theme in the thinking of Bosch and his theology in Transforming Mission is his epistemological framework. He was quite perceptive in this regard as he also found himself on the other side of an epistemological paradigm shift: from modernity to postmodernity. Bosch recognised the postmodern critique and recognised that our interpretations often reflect our contexts, perspectives, and biases. He didn’t, however, see the postmodern answer as helpful, and he consequently proposed to live in a creative tension between the two, that is, critical realism (Bosch, 1991, p. 187).
In the book’s introduction, Bosch highlights that the church’s mission had gone through (or was in the process of going through) a paradigm shift. Mission during this transitory shift was at the height of its crisis and was in a constant state of scrutiny due to its captivity to the West. Criticism, he argues, should not surprise the church, since her mission, in reality, has always been in a state of crisis. However, one of her problems is that she rarely recognises it. Bosch proposes that instead of panic, the church ought to include reflection on her mission as a permanent item on her agenda (Bosch, 1991, p. 2).
The missional crisis as Bosch sees it is three-fold: its foundation, its motives and aims, and the nature of its mission. He argues that an inadequate foundation for mission and ambiguous missionary motives and aims will inevitably lead to unsatisfactory missionary practices. This, he points out, is evident in the church’s missiological captivity to the West’s historical foundations and aims, as seen in missionary collusion in colonial expansion and sharing in its perceived supremacy. Bosch (1991, pp. 5-7) suggests: “If there is no possibility of ignoring the present crisis in mission, nor any point in trying to circumvent it, the only valid way open to us is to deal with the crisis in utmost sincerity yet without allowing ourselves to succumb to it. Once again: crisis is the point where danger and opportunity meet.” This does not mean the adoption of all the values of the world, but it can’t mean we cling to the past (Bosch, 1991, p. 7). Bosch is making the point that there is need for a new missional paradigm.
The Exegete, Historian, and Visionary
The main body of the book consists of three parts, with the first part of the book devoted to his first missional model–the New Testament paradigm–by considering Matthew, Luke, and Paul. The second part deals with consequent historical models: Eastern Orthodox, Roman Catholic, and Protestant (pre- and post-Enlightenment). In his final part, he deals with the current climate: the unraveling post-enlightenment world and the emerging paradigm.
As mentioned above, Bosch’s first section approaches the text fully aware of the propensity readers have of importing their worlds into the text; consistent with his epistemological framework he goes at length to avoid anachronisms when it comes to our presentations of Jesus (e.g., presenting Jesus as a picture of free market capitalism or as a Marxist revolutionary). His aim was to approach the New Testament with great care and humility in its presentation of Jesus and the early church. By looking at Matthew, Luke, and Paul (in chapters 2-4), Bosch posits that mission was part of the early church’s DNA, and not merely one of its functions. Bosch does, however, point out that when the early church’s mission is isolated within its context, it becomes clear that there isn’t one default strategy, but many. As a corollary, those strategies may not necessarily translate into our own contexts. For this reason, one has to apply a “critical hermeneutic” to evaluate the interplay between the original context and our own (Bosch, 1991, pp. 15-25).
In the second part of his work, Bosch looks at the missional paradigms after the NT church to his current situation. In chapters 6-9 he covers four large brackets of time: the eastern/patristic paradigm, the medieval Roman Catholic paradigm, the Protestant Reformation paradigm, and the missionary paradigm in light of the enlightenment. Most important for this paper’s purpose is the section which sheds light on the crisis that led to the paradigm shift that Bosch experienced in the enlightenment age. Nussbaum (2005, p. 75) points out that it is the longest chapter due to its importance for the contemporary missiological task.
Towards the end of chapter 9, Bosch posits a list of motifs that blended together since the middle of the eighteenth century to form a mosaic in missionary thinking. These motives are “..the glory of God, a sense of urgency because of the imminent millennium, the love of Christ, compassion for those considered eternally lost, a sense of duty, the awareness of cultural superiority, and competition with Catholic missionary efforts...” (Bosch, 1991, p. 349). But the epistemological air that this age produced made it clear that these motifs betrayed features of the enlightenment such as its optimistic anthropology. Consequently, there were two reactions to this, both of which employed the same epistemological tools in their approaches, however with contradictory paths to the same grand result. On the one hand, the liberals placed themselves above the Bible and used it as an ethical book, and on the other hand, the fundamentalists applied the Bible mechanically to every context. Thus, their two contradictory paths used the same tools wherein each person was able to understand the Bible in their own right, so both paths ended up using the Bible as a tool that objectified the people they engaged as means to their ends (Bosch, 1991, p. 342). The postmodern critique saw right through this inconsistency, which is where Bosch recognises the new paradigm shift occurring.
In the third part of the book, Bosch addresses the emerging paradigm. He now departs from historical and exegetical evaluations to lay out a proposal for this new paradigm. Paradigm shifts, Bosch notes, are both evolutionary and revolutionary, that is, they have both continuity but also discontinuity, and so change (Bosch, 1991, p. 366). Therefore, Bosch is careful not to reject everything that preceded him, which fits in with his epistemological framework as mentioned above. His proposal is to persist in a “creative tension” between modernity and post-modernity, and thus he proposes a post-positivist methodological approach to mission. “A post-Enlightenment self-critical Christian stance may, in the modern world, be the only means of neutralizing the ideologies; it is the only vehicle that can save us from self-deception and free us from dependence on utopian dreams” (Bosch 1991, p. 361).
In this visionary section, Bosch lays out a series he calls “elements of an emerging ecumenical missionary paradigm.” These elements he gleaned from his observance of world missionary conferences (Bosch, 1991, p. 369). He lists thirteen elements for his proposed eccumenical paradigm, mission as: 1) the church with others, 2) Missio Dei, 3) mediating salvation, 4) quest for justice, 5) evangelism, 6) contextualisation, 7) liberation, 8) inculturation, 9) common witness, 10) ministry by the whole people of God, 11) witness to people of other living faiths, 12) theology, and 13) action in hope (Bosch, 1991, pp. 368-510).