I'm simply astounded at the comparisons this book is getting. Harry Potter? Perhaps, in so much as it contains a school (can we please get over "fantasy with a school in it"=Harry Potter? It's ridiculous). His Dark Materials? Well, there's some talk of sin, religion, and Oxford I suppose ...
This book has a fantastic premise, but ultimately I found it pretentious, misogynistic, and poorly-written.
Let's tackle pretentiousness shall we? It oozed out of every word. The author tries to make incredible metaphors, similes, and all that jazz, but mostly it just reads pretentious and makes it difficult to slog through. Even ignoring the style of the writing, there are so many minor (uninteresting, unoriginal) digressions on the nature of humanity and stuff that at times I wanted to just crawl away and read something sensible like the back of a packet of noodles. I can handle a little pretentiousness if it's done well, but this was just average.
Misogyny ... well ... this took a long time to surface. I was 86% of the way through before it smacked me around the face. I would've stopped reading then if this hadn't been a NetGalley book, and I didn't need to review it. If I hadn't been 86% of the way through, I might have put it down anyway because of all the rage. Fortunately I didn't, so now I get to tear it apart in a review. Little consolation for the belittling of my gender, but we take what we can get.
There are four female characters in this book who get more than a passing mention. There will be spoilers as I discuss them, but as I generally don't support people reading nonsense like this, don't worry about them.
The women are: Livia, a stuck-up nun turned seductress. Lady Naylor, a smart scientist who's actually just carrying on the work of her husband. Mrs Grendel, who largely exists to do the bidding of other people. Some girl who nurses one of the boys and kisses him.
If you can't see the problem with those descriptions, then please go read some feminist material and come back to me later.
I was initially very excited to see Livia and Lady Naylor. They're both strong people, smart people, a little flawed. I was so looking forward to exploring Smoke with an aristocratic lady scientist! But oh wait ... she's actually one of the villains ... and she's only doing it because of her husband ... and she kind of goes mad there at the end because she's clearly just a hysterical woman. We don't need more fiction about how fragile and insane women are. We really, really don't.
Livia is far more of a problem than Lady Naylor. She starts off as an ascetic nun type, who's scornful of the boys, but has a certain amount of hidden depth. When she starts developing a connection with one of the boys, Charlie, I sighed but understood it. Charlie is a sweet boy with many valuable qualities, and would be a smart choice for Livia, assuming she can get over her hang ups with Smoke. They're hiding down a mine at some point and against most of her morals, she kisses him. That was fine.
A while later, she's been separated from Charlie for a couple of days. A chance encounter with an amorous couple and some Smoke, however, and now all of a sudden Livia has the hots for the other boy, Thomas. There was no indication of this beforehand, no undertones of any kind of feeling--in fact Livia is pretty disgusted by this boy and doesn't even like him looking at her.
I thought the sudden feelings would die off fast and remain as a strong reminder of the power of Smoke, but instead the author pushes this ludicrous love triangle on us that doesn't actually serve any purpose in the story. It adds in small amount of excruciatingly awkward "tension" in terms of "ooooh who will she pick????" and "will the boys have to fight each other over this girl who has no chemistry at all with one of them????". It was seriously cringe worthy.
It got worse right at the end, when, spoiler alert, Livia is totally ok with initiating some kind of polyamory situation with both of them. Which ... I mean ... there's a certain amount of power and freedom in this, sure, but ... her whole being is mostly reduced down to this. She loses all her morals, everything that makes her who she is, and at the end she just gets two guys. She's made entirely into a sex object and it's not even remotely ok.
The bit that made me want to put the book down naturally concerns Livia. She's just put on a nice dress after a while wearing working men's clothing. She's walking through London with the boys and (the ARC I had said please don't quote things from that version unless I've checked with the final version, but there's no way I'm buying a copy of this book, and there's no way this is an accident) "Her fine dress elicits comments, catcalls, caps doffed in mock homage ... There is ... her own thrill at being noticed". WHAT THE ACTUAL HELL??????
No. The author is a man. Chances of him ever being catcalled are virtually nil. Being catcalled is NOT OK. Being catcalled usually results in a feeling of being slightly dirty, of feeling used, objectified, and otherwise made to feel like you're worth less than the abusers doing the catcalling. Thrill at being noticed? Hell. No. I'm disgusted that this male author can just casually throw stuff out there like this. Catcalling is not a cute way of making girls feel noticed, it's sexual harassment. I also don't buy for one minute that Livia, only a week or two out from being utterly nun-like, and a sheltered member of the aristocracy to boot, is flattered by it.
A few pages later we get "...Charlie. Trusting her. Treating her as his equal. She is grateful and disgruntled all at once." Again, what the actual hell is going on here? Charlie's been treating Livia very well the whole time, for a start, but seriously ... girls are supposed to be grateful when men treat them as equals? Sod that. Worse, she's disgruntled to be treated as his equal? In this author's male privileged little world, I suppose girls are supposed to secretly want to be lesser.
On the same page we get Livia acting "coquettish. And wonders did she learn it from Mother, or from one of the girls in school; or is it simply in her blood?" Because being a little flirty tease is for sure written into women's blood.
If these things were exploring something, showing facets of the society, or deepening the character so we could really understand her, then sure, it could have worked. But they're just casual comments. They don't indicate a change. They just indicate that the author is ignorant about the experiences of women (if I give him a lot of leeway).
Moving on, I'll get into why it's poorly-written.
POV issues. Right from the off this book was shaky. Before I hit 86% I was mostly going to comment on the POV issues, but I guess I'll keep this part short now.
The author jumps around from third person limited-ish to third person omniscient, to first person. It's really jarring. The first person bits just crop up out of nowhere and don't really add anything to the story. Some of them feel like self-indulgent explorations so the author could understand what was happening away from the main events. The kind of stuff that's usually in a separate backstory document and shouldn't really make it into the novel itself. This hopping around is not only distracting, it made developing a close relationship with any of the actual main characters fairly challenging because I kept getting dragged into these random uninteresting side stories. Really weird choice, in my opinion, and I was surprised to learn this isn't the author's first book, because it really read like a new writer who isn't sure what POV is for and how to use it.
The plot is average, slightly dull, even. Most of my interest throughout the book was in finding out about the Smoke, and why it suddenly appeared in the 17th century. That question is never answered (so I guess we're waiting for a sequel?) and I've already stopped caring. Like the POV usage, the plot seemed amateurish. The answers are all spilled out at the end, monologue-style, as if the author needed to tick off some boxes as the draft neared its end but only had a few pages in which to do it.
All in all, the premise of this book sounds incredible, and I'm pretty sure that's the only reason it sold because the rest of it is super weak, and y'know, offensive to women. I won't be buying the sequel, and I definitely won't be checking out any more of the author's books because I don’t need to invite any more misogyny into my life, thank you very much.