What do you think?
Rate this book


192 pages, Hardcover
First published September 22, 2015
"Thor spent most of his time journeying in his chariot, pulled by his two goats, Tanngrisnir and Tanngnjost, in search of giants to kill. Though he had strength beyond all others, he still relied on three treasures in this quest. One was his belt, Megingjord; it doubled his strength. One was his iron gloves, Jarngreip; when he wore them, he could grip his hammer properly and swing it with effect. And the third was, of course, that hammer, the one that the brother dwarfs Brokk and Sindri had crafted for him: Mjolnir."
I liked the pictures in this book. The pictures were beautiful, and that is the sole reason this book got two stars rather than one. That in itself should say enough about the writing, but I'll go into more detail.
This book was written for children, but I would not read it even to children. I read it out loud to my mom, and the only way I managed to get through it was because reading out loud meant that I could make sarcastic comments on the writing to my mom. I read this to learn about Norse mythology, and I achieved that, but it was not worth it. For one thing, the accounts were not particularly detailed or well explained, so I basically just got an outline and I'm going to have to read another book to actually learn the details of the myths. Second, Donna Jo Napoli included far too much of her own opinion for my taste. I read this to learn about Norse mythology, not what Napoli thought of them. She adds her own moral interpretations at the end of each chapter:
[M]aybe Frey got what he deserved.
Think of Vali and Nari. We know little of them. They may have been blameless, guilty of nothing more than being Loki's sons. Guilt by association... is that what the Aesir used to justify the violent undoing of these two men? What a cowardly thing.
In addition to the unnecessary homilies, the writing was also just bad. She used the word "yikes," far too often, and included passages such as:
No, no, no. His own taste for blood and gore---that was the real dishonor in him. Shame, shame on Thor.I could not help but read the stories sarcastically, because I can't read a phrase like that one seriously. She also felt the need to include that she didn't understand the mythology and found it illogical (as if mythology usually follows the rules of reality). Napoli said "I don't know how it [Draupnir] came to be in Skirnir's hands at any point. Bur, perhaps, if Skirnir has Draupnir, then Loki is dead. Yet at this point in my retelling, Loki is still alive." Napoli also mentioned that she was unsure of the chronology of stories, so she put them in the order she thought had the most dramatic effect. If the timeline that she made up does not make sense, I think that's an issue with her retelling, rather than an issue with the mythology.
The illustrations were gorgeous. My congratulations to Christina Balit for making images so beautiful that I'm going to keep this book in spite of Napoli's writing.
I don't recommend this book. I am going to try to find a more comprehensive and less sermonic account of Norse mythology, because the topic is interesting but this book is not a good source to learn about it. If I ever tell kids about Norse mythology, I will show them the pictures in this book and then summarize the stories in my own words. Although the pictures are pretty, I wouldn't have bought the book if I'd known the pictures were the only good part, so I can't recommend it solely based off that.