What do you think?
Rate this book
Fire in the Minds of Men: Origins of the Revolutionary Faith
This book traces the origins of a faith--perhaps the faith of the century. Modern revolutionaries are believers, no less committed and intense than were Christians or Muslims of an earlier era. What is new is the belief that a perfect secular order will emerge from forcible overthrow of traditional authority. This inherently implausible idea energized Europe in the nineteenth century, and became the most pronounced ideological export of the West to the rest of the world in the twentieth century. Billington is interested in revolutionaries--the innovative creators of a new tradition. His historical frame extends from the waning of the French Revolution in the late eighteenth century to the beginnings of the Russian Revolution in the early twentieth century.
The theater was Europe of the industrial era; the main stage was the journalistic offices within great cities such as Paris, Berlin, London, and St. Petersburg. Billington claims with considerable evidence that revolutionary ideologies were shaped as much by the occultism and proto-romanticism of Germany as the critical rationalism of the French Enlightenment. The conversion of social theory to political practice was essentially the work of three Russian revolutions: in 1905, March 1917, and November 1917.
Events in the outer rim of the European world brought discussions about revolution out of the school rooms and press rooms of Paris and Berlin into the halls of power.
Despite his hard realism about the adverse practical consequences of revolutionary dogma, Billington appreciates the identity of its best sponsors, people who preached social justice transcending traditional national, ethnic, and gender boundaries. When this book originally appeared The New Republic hailed it as "remarkable, learned and lively," while The New Yorker noted that Billington "pays great attention to the lives and emotions of individuals and this makes his book absorbing." It is an invaluable work of history and contribution to our understanding of political life.
The theater was Europe of the industrial era; the main stage was the journalistic offices within great cities such as Paris, Berlin, London, and St. Petersburg. Billington claims with considerable evidence that revolutionary ideologies were shaped as much by the occultism and proto-romanticism of Germany as the critical rationalism of the French Enlightenment. The conversion of social theory to political practice was essentially the work of three Russian revolutions: in 1905, March 1917, and November 1917.
Events in the outer rim of the European world brought discussions about revolution out of the school rooms and press rooms of Paris and Berlin into the halls of power.
Despite his hard realism about the adverse practical consequences of revolutionary dogma, Billington appreciates the identity of its best sponsors, people who preached social justice transcending traditional national, ethnic, and gender boundaries. When this book originally appeared The New Republic hailed it as "remarkable, learned and lively," while The New Yorker noted that Billington "pays great attention to the lives and emotions of individuals and this makes his book absorbing." It is an invaluable work of history and contribution to our understanding of political life.
677 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1980
83 people are currently reading
1759 people want to read
About the author
James H. Billington
32 books36 followersJames Hadley Billington, the Librarian of Congress Emeritus, was a leading American academic and author who taught history at Harvard and Princeton before serving for 42 years as CEO of four federal cultural institutions. He served as the 13th Librarian of Congress after being nominated as 13th by President Ronald Reagan in 1987, and his appointment was approved unanimously by the U.S. Senate. He retired as Librarian on September 30, 2015.
(Source: Wikipedia)
(Source: Wikipedia)
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 21 of 21 reviews
April 22, 2013
I have approached this several times now, and apparently I have been silenced by reviewer's block: I cannot summon the words to say anything meaningful about this utterly brilliant, exhausting, scholarly, well-written, divergently focussed, overwhelming, first-class work on the development of Revolutionary Faith during the period from the French Revolution to the Bolshevik seizure of power in October of 1917. All I can do is recommend it, without reserve, to anybody remotely interested in this topic. Most of the internet reviews seem to focus upon the fact that Billington uncovers the occult origins of the revolutionary tradition, the secret societies in which it gestated and grew, the Masonic and Illuminist legacies and borrowings, the obsession with hierarchy and conspiracy, organizational circles and triangles, tiered cell structures and revelational geomancy—this is true, but accounts for a minute portion of this magisterial effort, and leads me to wonder if the majority of those reviewers read much beyond the first three chapters.
What one actually encounters along with the occult aspects comprises a detailed and thoughtful historical analysis of the revolutionary impulse, including the birth and competition of the nationalist versus the socialist strains; the role played by journalists, poets, musicians, and intellectuals; the subtle interplay between the extremes of the Right and the Left and how they co-opted, interdepended upon, and interborrowed each other's ideologies and tactics; the religious, gnostic, mythological and eschatological elements that abounded in early revolutionary tradition and which continued to exert an influence as that tradition cohered, developed and matured; the equal importance of the positivistic, scientific, and philosophical strains in the revolutionary edifice as provided by the likes of Saint-Simon, Comte, and Hegel; the pivotal parts played by a variegated cast of actors besides that of primary and well-known figures such as Robespierre, Maréchal, Buonarroti, Mazzini, Garibaldi, Marx, Proudhon, Bakunin, and Lenin; the sovereignty amongst revolutionary dogma of the necessity for a simplification of a complex and confusing bourgeois order, an action which called for violence and the overturning of established systems in order to be realized; the actual development of the working class as set against its mythical identity as the proletariat; the tenacious and fervent opposition engendered within apostates when they have migrated fully to the opposing side; the curious separations and conflicted histories of the rubrical three under which the French Revolution flowered—liberté, égalité, fraternité—amidst a terrain of warfare, revolution, republican liberalism, monarchical reaction, and industrial gigantism; the transference of the center of revolutionary thought and innovation from Paris and France eastwards to Germany and, most importantly, Russia; the morphing of a romantic and utopian revolutionary vision—whose paramount early practitioners were Italians and Poles—into one of an ideological and mechanical structure—exemplified by the Central and Eastern European branches—as well as the evolution of the use of violence from heroic gesture to applied theory; the tracing of the revolutionary faith as exported to the Middle East, North Africa, Southeast Asia, South America, and—most broadly—North America, including early American Masonic and Catholic influences, the nationalist flavors of radical thought in the United States, the innovations of ethnic immigrants—primarily the Irish and Poles—the labour wars of the late nineteenth century, and the progressive drive that picked up speed heading into the First World War; acute penetration of the mindset of the revolutionary intellectual as an alienated and disputatious educated elite commonly ignorant of the actuality of life for the working class and the latter's signal preference for practical economic and political solutions as opposed to the universal and abstract utopian ideologies of the intelligentsia; the catalyst property of having a sizable population of highly—perhaps overly—educated young men without the requisite employment suitable for their intellectual aptitudes in the flowering and development of a revolutionary current within modern states; a tracing of the divergent paths taken by the political socialists as against the radical socialists, along with their competition with anarchism and syndicalism, and the elements of the latter that—in its utter contempt for bourgeois values and centralizing parliamentary process—blended with a newly awoken nationalist revolutionary passion into postwar fascism; the pertinent and powerful role played by women radicals throughout the era placed under Billington's microscope, with special attention paid to Rosa Luxemburg and her leadership of a firmly anti-war and anti-authoritarian communism, her opposition to Lenin, her reluctant support of postwar revolution in Germany, and how her execution in 1919 affected the potentiality of anti-Bolshevik communism in Central Europe; pointed and thoughtful analogies of various nineteenth century revolutionary periods with movements and events in the modern twentieth; and much more.
Of a similar vein to the modern historical output of such as Burleigh—and a perfect companion to Kolakowski and Wohl and even our own unheralded Canuck sparkplug, Graham—Billington shines in a class of his own. This compendium of thoughtful analysis begins with a fascinating exploration of the complicity of the house of Orléans in gestating the revolutionary spirit in France—offering the sprawling, café-strewn garden grounds of the Palais-Royale as a meeting place, and fermenting ground, for the restlessly percolating intellects alive to the progression of a liberating and equalizing spirit through the western half of the European continent—and just moves forward boldly and brilliantly tailing those headwinds gusting potently into the nineteenth century. With a tiny font and some one hundred and fifty pages of endnotes, this thoroughly researched and deeply learned tome makes for a slow and demanding textual journey; but I consider every hour of my life that was consumed in reading this to be sixty minutes well spent.
What one actually encounters along with the occult aspects comprises a detailed and thoughtful historical analysis of the revolutionary impulse, including the birth and competition of the nationalist versus the socialist strains; the role played by journalists, poets, musicians, and intellectuals; the subtle interplay between the extremes of the Right and the Left and how they co-opted, interdepended upon, and interborrowed each other's ideologies and tactics; the religious, gnostic, mythological and eschatological elements that abounded in early revolutionary tradition and which continued to exert an influence as that tradition cohered, developed and matured; the equal importance of the positivistic, scientific, and philosophical strains in the revolutionary edifice as provided by the likes of Saint-Simon, Comte, and Hegel; the pivotal parts played by a variegated cast of actors besides that of primary and well-known figures such as Robespierre, Maréchal, Buonarroti, Mazzini, Garibaldi, Marx, Proudhon, Bakunin, and Lenin; the sovereignty amongst revolutionary dogma of the necessity for a simplification of a complex and confusing bourgeois order, an action which called for violence and the overturning of established systems in order to be realized; the actual development of the working class as set against its mythical identity as the proletariat; the tenacious and fervent opposition engendered within apostates when they have migrated fully to the opposing side; the curious separations and conflicted histories of the rubrical three under which the French Revolution flowered—liberté, égalité, fraternité—amidst a terrain of warfare, revolution, republican liberalism, monarchical reaction, and industrial gigantism; the transference of the center of revolutionary thought and innovation from Paris and France eastwards to Germany and, most importantly, Russia; the morphing of a romantic and utopian revolutionary vision—whose paramount early practitioners were Italians and Poles—into one of an ideological and mechanical structure—exemplified by the Central and Eastern European branches—as well as the evolution of the use of violence from heroic gesture to applied theory; the tracing of the revolutionary faith as exported to the Middle East, North Africa, Southeast Asia, South America, and—most broadly—North America, including early American Masonic and Catholic influences, the nationalist flavors of radical thought in the United States, the innovations of ethnic immigrants—primarily the Irish and Poles—the labour wars of the late nineteenth century, and the progressive drive that picked up speed heading into the First World War; acute penetration of the mindset of the revolutionary intellectual as an alienated and disputatious educated elite commonly ignorant of the actuality of life for the working class and the latter's signal preference for practical economic and political solutions as opposed to the universal and abstract utopian ideologies of the intelligentsia; the catalyst property of having a sizable population of highly—perhaps overly—educated young men without the requisite employment suitable for their intellectual aptitudes in the flowering and development of a revolutionary current within modern states; a tracing of the divergent paths taken by the political socialists as against the radical socialists, along with their competition with anarchism and syndicalism, and the elements of the latter that—in its utter contempt for bourgeois values and centralizing parliamentary process—blended with a newly awoken nationalist revolutionary passion into postwar fascism; the pertinent and powerful role played by women radicals throughout the era placed under Billington's microscope, with special attention paid to Rosa Luxemburg and her leadership of a firmly anti-war and anti-authoritarian communism, her opposition to Lenin, her reluctant support of postwar revolution in Germany, and how her execution in 1919 affected the potentiality of anti-Bolshevik communism in Central Europe; pointed and thoughtful analogies of various nineteenth century revolutionary periods with movements and events in the modern twentieth; and much more.
Of a similar vein to the modern historical output of such as Burleigh—and a perfect companion to Kolakowski and Wohl and even our own unheralded Canuck sparkplug, Graham—Billington shines in a class of his own. This compendium of thoughtful analysis begins with a fascinating exploration of the complicity of the house of Orléans in gestating the revolutionary spirit in France—offering the sprawling, café-strewn garden grounds of the Palais-Royale as a meeting place, and fermenting ground, for the restlessly percolating intellects alive to the progression of a liberating and equalizing spirit through the western half of the European continent—and just moves forward boldly and brilliantly tailing those headwinds gusting potently into the nineteenth century. With a tiny font and some one hundred and fifty pages of endnotes, this thoroughly researched and deeply learned tome makes for a slow and demanding textual journey; but I consider every hour of my life that was consumed in reading this to be sixty minutes well spent.
June 25, 2018
This book is one of a rare sort: published in the modern era it nonetheless looks with a relatively honest eye at the revolutionary movements that reshaped Europe, American and finally the world in the past several centuries. Most remarkable because it was written not by a Catholic or a 'conspiracy theorist', but by a secular-left member of the Establishment Atlanticists, James H. Billington (former chief librarian to the Library of Congress).
Billington establishes, with elaborate detail, insightful analysis and endless footnotes, that the modern state and its ideological foundations were in fact birthed by secret societies with anti-Clerical/anti-Catholic religious agendas and anti-monarchical, revolutionary political agendas. The movements which took power in the 18th and especially the 19th century, and which birthed the totalitarian movements (Atlantic liberalism included) of the 20th century were deeply linked together, and in contrast to their public propaganda the 'national revolution', the 'social revolution' and 'liberalism' are more Siamese triplets than nemeses.
He also shows that the political journalism associated with these movement drew its members, its funding and its ideology from these same Masonic-style movements, and one may assume that these interconnections persist to this day.
Billington establishes, with elaborate detail, insightful analysis and endless footnotes, that the modern state and its ideological foundations were in fact birthed by secret societies with anti-Clerical/anti-Catholic religious agendas and anti-monarchical, revolutionary political agendas. The movements which took power in the 18th and especially the 19th century, and which birthed the totalitarian movements (Atlantic liberalism included) of the 20th century were deeply linked together, and in contrast to their public propaganda the 'national revolution', the 'social revolution' and 'liberalism' are more Siamese triplets than nemeses.
He also shows that the political journalism associated with these movement drew its members, its funding and its ideology from these same Masonic-style movements, and one may assume that these interconnections persist to this day.
November 8, 2015
I can't add much to existing reviews that point out the magnificent research and brilliant observations by the author. No doubt that the number of names and writing style challenge the reader, but like so many good things the joy is in the journey and effort to make it to the end. I did struggle at times with the scope and in the end I know the satisfaction as a result of the knowledge gained is the ultimate testimony to the greatness of this book.
June 17, 2021
Fire in the Minds of Men is an extremely thorough tour de force of the history of revolutionary thought in the nineteenth century. James Billington, former Librarian of Congress under President Reagan, traces the development of left-wing ideology from the French Revolution until the Russian Revolution.
He writes about the many, many thinkers and professional revolutionaries across Europe, although he focuses on France, Russia, Poland, Italy, and Germany. Billington was very erudite. The sources he cites are numerous and mostly in French. Among other interesting things, he traces the evolution of revolutionary nationalism and how, on the left, it gave way to internationalism by the 1860s and 70s. Yet both remained squarely on the side of revolution right up until the Third Reich.
Billington is a bit dry and at times suffers from a lack of focus. He covers a lot of obscure nineteenth-century revolutionaries who today have no importance except for historians like him. It makes his book (at 677 pages including footnotes) a bit of a slog.
Nevertheless, Fire in the Minds of Men remains a classic reference for those interested in the development of revolutionary ideology in the nineteenth century.
He writes about the many, many thinkers and professional revolutionaries across Europe, although he focuses on France, Russia, Poland, Italy, and Germany. Billington was very erudite. The sources he cites are numerous and mostly in French. Among other interesting things, he traces the evolution of revolutionary nationalism and how, on the left, it gave way to internationalism by the 1860s and 70s. Yet both remained squarely on the side of revolution right up until the Third Reich.
Billington is a bit dry and at times suffers from a lack of focus. He covers a lot of obscure nineteenth-century revolutionaries who today have no importance except for historians like him. It makes his book (at 677 pages including footnotes) a bit of a slog.
Nevertheless, Fire in the Minds of Men remains a classic reference for those interested in the development of revolutionary ideology in the nineteenth century.
February 13, 2025
Magisterial social / intellectual history of revolutionary movements c. 1789-1917 with a focus on their quasi-religious (and occasionally overtly religious) nature. Essential reading for anyone interested in the subject.
October 3, 2022
Entertaining, very detailed and well referenced history of the key protagonists of the revolutionary period between 1789 and 1917. I found myself taking many notes and reading up on the people and events he describes.
Lots of details you are unlikely to find anywhere else due to the author's position as a Librarian of Congress, with access to the National libraries of USA, USSR and many European countries. Many of the books he references do not exist outside of these libraries.
This book would make a great jumping off point for deeper study of this influential period.
Lots of details you are unlikely to find anywhere else due to the author's position as a Librarian of Congress, with access to the National libraries of USA, USSR and many European countries. Many of the books he references do not exist outside of these libraries.
This book would make a great jumping off point for deeper study of this influential period.
November 6, 2021
Ideas provide fuel for actions to maintain inertia. FIRE IN THE MINDS OF MEN by James H. Billington tells us a story about the ideological evolution of communism/socialism during the 19th and early 20th century.
This book is a very intense, dense read where one can easily get lost in time or territory. It is immensely well researched and considered. It lives in a subject not explored enough: a history of ideas over time and cultures.
This book is a very intense, dense read where one can easily get lost in time or territory. It is immensely well researched and considered. It lives in a subject not explored enough: a history of ideas over time and cultures.
April 17, 2023
This is a very important book on the origins of political communism from the French Revolution onward. The origins of many of the social and political issues we face have their place in 19th century Europe. I strongly recommend this book to anyone who wants to understand our world today, where the ideologies came from, and who put them into play first. It is an amazing work by the Librarian of Congress who had been the director of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
December 30, 2022
Dense but incredibly authoritative, Billington's background. The structure of secret societies inherently disproves any notion that "a conspiracy that large would surely be found by now" since compartmentalization and mutually-incriminating evidence makes defection from a secret society basically impossible
March 13, 2025
Masterpiece
September 3, 2025
Only read book one, but greatly enjoyed.
December 22, 2018
I borrowed this book from the library and I'm going to have to buy a copy for myself. It's hard to believe how much knowledge the author has on the topic of the origins of revolutionary faith. It will take me another reading or two with peripheral research to fully absorb the material. A seminal work!
June 14, 2024
I read Fire in the Minds of Men for the 2024 All Around the Year in 52 Books. The prompt was: A book whose author’s name includes one of the 4 least used letters in the alphabet (JQZX).
June 20, 2023
James Billington's "Fire in the Minds of Men" stands as a seminal work in the field of intellectual history, offering a comprehensive exploration of the revolutionary ideas that have shaped modern societies. Billington delves into the historical development of revolutionary thought, examining the intellectual, social, and cultural factors that have fueled revolutionary movements throughout history. This review aims to provide an academic evaluation of Billington's arguments, discussing the book's strengths, weaknesses, and its significance within the field of intellectual and political history.
"Fire in the Minds of Men" by James Billington offers a detailed analysis of the ideologies and ideas that have driven revolutionary movements across different historical periods. Billington traces the intellectual lineage of revolutionary thought, exploring the works of influential philosophers, writers, and activists who have played a pivotal role in shaping the course of history. From the French Revolution to the Russian Revolution and beyond, Billington delves into the core ideas, beliefs, and motivations that have ignited social and political upheavals.
Billington's work stands out for its comprehensive examination of revolutionary ideas in their broader cultural and historical context. He highlights the interplay between intellectual movements, social conditions, and the aspirations of individuals and communities for radical change. By exploring the connections between literature, art, and political thought, Billington presents a nuanced understanding of the multifaceted nature of revolutionary ideologies.
One of the notable strengths of "Fire in the Minds of Men" lies in Billington's thorough research and meticulous attention to detail. He draws upon a wide range of primary and secondary sources, including philosophical treatises, literary works, and historical accounts, providing readers with a rich tapestry of intellectual history. This interdisciplinary approach enhances the depth and breadth of the analysis, contributing to a nuanced understanding of the ideological underpinnings of revolutionary movements.
Moreover, Billington's writing style is characterized by its clarity and accessibility. Despite the complexity of the subject matter, he presents complex ideas and arguments in a lucid and engaging manner, making the book accessible to both scholars and general readers. Billington's ability to convey the essence of revolutionary thought and its impact on society through compelling narratives contributes to the book's readability and wider appeal.
While "Fire in the Minds of Men" presents a compelling analysis, it is not without its limitations. Some critics argue that Billington's examination of revolutionary ideas may be overly Eurocentric, potentially overlooking the diverse range of intellectual movements and revolutionary thought found in non-Western contexts. A more global perspective could enhance the book's relevance and applicability to a broader range of revolutionary experiences.
Additionally, some readers may find that the book's ambitious scope results in a lack of in-depth analysis of specific revolutionary movements or thinkers. While Billington provides a comprehensive overview, those seeking a detailed examination of individual revolutions may need to consult more specialized works.
"Fire in the Minds of Men" holds significant importance within the field of intellectual and political history as a seminal work that illuminates the role of ideas in fueling revolutionary movements. Billington's exploration of the intellectual origins, cultural context, and societal impact of revolutionary thought encourages readers to reevaluate their understanding of the forces that drive social and political change. The book's contribution lies in its ability to stimulate critical reflections on the complex interplay between ideas, culture, and revolution, fostering a deeper understanding of the dynamics of transformative social movements.
GPT
"Fire in the Minds of Men" by James Billington offers a detailed analysis of the ideologies and ideas that have driven revolutionary movements across different historical periods. Billington traces the intellectual lineage of revolutionary thought, exploring the works of influential philosophers, writers, and activists who have played a pivotal role in shaping the course of history. From the French Revolution to the Russian Revolution and beyond, Billington delves into the core ideas, beliefs, and motivations that have ignited social and political upheavals.
Billington's work stands out for its comprehensive examination of revolutionary ideas in their broader cultural and historical context. He highlights the interplay between intellectual movements, social conditions, and the aspirations of individuals and communities for radical change. By exploring the connections between literature, art, and political thought, Billington presents a nuanced understanding of the multifaceted nature of revolutionary ideologies.
One of the notable strengths of "Fire in the Minds of Men" lies in Billington's thorough research and meticulous attention to detail. He draws upon a wide range of primary and secondary sources, including philosophical treatises, literary works, and historical accounts, providing readers with a rich tapestry of intellectual history. This interdisciplinary approach enhances the depth and breadth of the analysis, contributing to a nuanced understanding of the ideological underpinnings of revolutionary movements.
Moreover, Billington's writing style is characterized by its clarity and accessibility. Despite the complexity of the subject matter, he presents complex ideas and arguments in a lucid and engaging manner, making the book accessible to both scholars and general readers. Billington's ability to convey the essence of revolutionary thought and its impact on society through compelling narratives contributes to the book's readability and wider appeal.
While "Fire in the Minds of Men" presents a compelling analysis, it is not without its limitations. Some critics argue that Billington's examination of revolutionary ideas may be overly Eurocentric, potentially overlooking the diverse range of intellectual movements and revolutionary thought found in non-Western contexts. A more global perspective could enhance the book's relevance and applicability to a broader range of revolutionary experiences.
Additionally, some readers may find that the book's ambitious scope results in a lack of in-depth analysis of specific revolutionary movements or thinkers. While Billington provides a comprehensive overview, those seeking a detailed examination of individual revolutions may need to consult more specialized works.
"Fire in the Minds of Men" holds significant importance within the field of intellectual and political history as a seminal work that illuminates the role of ideas in fueling revolutionary movements. Billington's exploration of the intellectual origins, cultural context, and societal impact of revolutionary thought encourages readers to reevaluate their understanding of the forces that drive social and political change. The book's contribution lies in its ability to stimulate critical reflections on the complex interplay between ideas, culture, and revolution, fostering a deeper understanding of the dynamics of transformative social movements.
GPT
May 14, 2025
The Soft Glove over the Iron Fist of Revolution
James H. Billington wasn’t just an academic—he was Librarian of Congress, Rhodes Scholar, a CFR insider, and a man shaped by elite Anglo-American institutions. His access to global archives is impressive, but so is his subtle gatekeeping. Billington writes with the soft sheen of an intellectual historian, but behind the erudition lies a reluctance to name the financiers who poured gasoline on the revolutionary flames.
Despite his deep dives into esoteric Masonic networks, symbolic revolutions, and ideological contagions, Billington carefully avoids exposing the industrial backers of these movements—the bankers, industrialists, and power cartels. For that, Antony Sutton kicks in the door.
⸻
Main Thesis: Revolution as a Secular Religion
Billington argues that modern revolutions aren’t just political—they’re spiritual surrogates for lost religious faith. The revolutionaries aren’t simply agitators; they’re true believers, apostles of a new order. From the Illuminati to Paris radicals, to Russian nihilists and anarchists, he paints a lineage of idea-pyromaniacs inflamed by utopia.
But he frames this as an ideological wildfire, not a funded operation. That’s where the picture gets dangerously incomplete.
⸻
What He Misses (or Avoids): Follow the Money
Enter Antony C. Sutton—economist, historian, and the man who named names. His work destroys the naive myth of organic revolutions by showing how Western banks and corporations bankrolled both the Bolsheviks and the Nazis.
Sutton’s facts that directly contradict Billington’s blind spots:
Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution
• Jacob Schiff (Kuhn, Loeb & Co.) funded Trotsky.
• Chase Bank (Rockefeller) and National City Bank gave support to Bolsheviks even after Lenin seized power.
• American Red Cross mission in Russia was a cover for corporate support.
Billington never touches these strings. He abstracts revolution into ideology, ignoring capital flows and supply chains that made them possible.
Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler
• IG Farben, Union Banking Corp., and Thyssen—heavily funded and backed by Brown Brothers Harriman, Prescott Bush, and JP Morgan connections.
• Ford and General Motors were building up Nazi Germany’s logistics.
Billington’s narrative of revolutionary faith is accurate—but one-dimensional. He shows the fire but not who’s holding the lighter.
⸻
Opinion: Controlled Burn, Not Wildfire
Billington’s book is a masterpiece of ideological history, but it’s also an elegant distraction. He traces the “why” of revolutions without examining the “who” behind them. In a world where revolutions are steered by capital as much as creed, ignoring the financiers is either an act of academic cowardice or institutional complicity.
Sutton, by contrast, blows the lid off and names the Anglo-American elite who profit from controlled chaos. When you read both, you start seeing the revolution not as a spiritual outcry—but as a strategic weapon of geopolitical engineering.
⸻
Verdict:
• Billington = useful for understanding revolutionary psychology.
• Sutton = essential for exposing revolutionary logistics and funding.
• If you only read Billington, you get a romanticized half-truth.
• Read Sutton alongside, and the full shadow emerges—the fire in their minds was lit with Rockefeller oil.
James H. Billington wasn’t just an academic—he was Librarian of Congress, Rhodes Scholar, a CFR insider, and a man shaped by elite Anglo-American institutions. His access to global archives is impressive, but so is his subtle gatekeeping. Billington writes with the soft sheen of an intellectual historian, but behind the erudition lies a reluctance to name the financiers who poured gasoline on the revolutionary flames.
Despite his deep dives into esoteric Masonic networks, symbolic revolutions, and ideological contagions, Billington carefully avoids exposing the industrial backers of these movements—the bankers, industrialists, and power cartels. For that, Antony Sutton kicks in the door.
⸻
Main Thesis: Revolution as a Secular Religion
Billington argues that modern revolutions aren’t just political—they’re spiritual surrogates for lost religious faith. The revolutionaries aren’t simply agitators; they’re true believers, apostles of a new order. From the Illuminati to Paris radicals, to Russian nihilists and anarchists, he paints a lineage of idea-pyromaniacs inflamed by utopia.
But he frames this as an ideological wildfire, not a funded operation. That’s where the picture gets dangerously incomplete.
⸻
What He Misses (or Avoids): Follow the Money
Enter Antony C. Sutton—economist, historian, and the man who named names. His work destroys the naive myth of organic revolutions by showing how Western banks and corporations bankrolled both the Bolsheviks and the Nazis.
Sutton’s facts that directly contradict Billington’s blind spots:
Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution
• Jacob Schiff (Kuhn, Loeb & Co.) funded Trotsky.
• Chase Bank (Rockefeller) and National City Bank gave support to Bolsheviks even after Lenin seized power.
• American Red Cross mission in Russia was a cover for corporate support.
Billington never touches these strings. He abstracts revolution into ideology, ignoring capital flows and supply chains that made them possible.
Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler
• IG Farben, Union Banking Corp., and Thyssen—heavily funded and backed by Brown Brothers Harriman, Prescott Bush, and JP Morgan connections.
• Ford and General Motors were building up Nazi Germany’s logistics.
Billington’s narrative of revolutionary faith is accurate—but one-dimensional. He shows the fire but not who’s holding the lighter.
⸻
Opinion: Controlled Burn, Not Wildfire
Billington’s book is a masterpiece of ideological history, but it’s also an elegant distraction. He traces the “why” of revolutions without examining the “who” behind them. In a world where revolutions are steered by capital as much as creed, ignoring the financiers is either an act of academic cowardice or institutional complicity.
Sutton, by contrast, blows the lid off and names the Anglo-American elite who profit from controlled chaos. When you read both, you start seeing the revolution not as a spiritual outcry—but as a strategic weapon of geopolitical engineering.
⸻
Verdict:
• Billington = useful for understanding revolutionary psychology.
• Sutton = essential for exposing revolutionary logistics and funding.
• If you only read Billington, you get a romanticized half-truth.
• Read Sutton alongside, and the full shadow emerges—the fire in their minds was lit with Rockefeller oil.
October 31, 2024
This book forcefully argues that all modern revolutionary movements share a common faith. Modern revolutionaries are believers, no less devout than zealots from earlier eras. This is the belief that a perfect secular order will emerge from a forcible overthrow of traditional authority. Billington traces the faith from its origins in the cafés of revolutionary Paris to its brutal overtaking of Russia with Lenin.
This book exhaustively lays out the religious structure animating left-wing thinking. It shows generation after generation of young educated men being energized by this belief and going on wild flights of rationalizations for their own thirst for power.
“you see the will of the people is symbolized by the historic spirit and the historic spirit must be channeled by a great leader. This leader symbolizes the will of the people and fits into the historic pattern, so he doesn’t need democracy to self correct.”
Billington portrays individual revolutionaries as well as revolutionary movements -the creators and incubators of a new tradition. By the time he gets to Karl Marx, the pretense of rational scientific explanation for the coming revolution seems all to familiar.
This book exhaustively lays out the religious structure animating left-wing thinking. It shows generation after generation of young educated men being energized by this belief and going on wild flights of rationalizations for their own thirst for power.
“you see the will of the people is symbolized by the historic spirit and the historic spirit must be channeled by a great leader. This leader symbolizes the will of the people and fits into the historic pattern, so he doesn’t need democracy to self correct.”
Billington portrays individual revolutionaries as well as revolutionary movements -the creators and incubators of a new tradition. By the time he gets to Karl Marx, the pretense of rational scientific explanation for the coming revolution seems all to familiar.
December 11, 2015
Very interesting book . And for the non professional hystorian ,ideologist and philoshopist , but who is not ignorant and is curious it is very reveling about the hystory of the 19th century leading to the 20th century.
Imeaditly from the first chapters , the french revolution , your beliefes from school and TV about the french revolution are confronted with man and ideas that are just far fetch , utiopian and pre-comunist . And you wonder ... why did this revolution turned out so bad actualy , but the american one turned out so good.... This question is dealt with further on in the book . But stil !!!
Yes there was abuse , poverty , inequality and opresive monarhs and nobels ..... But why did they wanted to change everithing in society !? They fought for utopian goals in order to overcome real problems !!!
Imeaditly from the first chapters , the french revolution , your beliefes from school and TV about the french revolution are confronted with man and ideas that are just far fetch , utiopian and pre-comunist . And you wonder ... why did this revolution turned out so bad actualy , but the american one turned out so good.... This question is dealt with further on in the book . But stil !!!
Yes there was abuse , poverty , inequality and opresive monarhs and nobels ..... But why did they wanted to change everithing in society !? They fought for utopian goals in order to overcome real problems !!!
March 16, 2023
Gives you a solid understanding of European revolutions that were carried out by secret societies and how they shaped Europe. This is the stuff you won’t learn from most history books. The subject matter is kind of dry so just keep that in mind.
March 27, 2007
Incredible read on the passions that foment revolutionary movements...a great historical narrative.
September 2, 2008
A great understanding of the Russian Revolution.
February 3, 2009
A great intellectual history - the stuff I studies in college.
Displaying 1 - 21 of 21 reviews