This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
John Greenleaf Whittier (1807-1892) was an influential American Quaker poet and ardent advocate of the abolition of slavery in the United States. He is usually listed as one of the Fireside Poets. Whittier was strongly influenced by the Scottish poet, Robert Burns.
Ninety-five percent of this poem is consummate "meh," and then you have final 5%, which is simply sublime. And you look back at the 95% and you think,"Huh, maybe I was too hard on you after all." Quite a turn around. Few texts, which I can think of anyhow, can say that. Top notch in my book.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
For of all sad words of tongue or pen, The saddest are these: "It might have been!"
After a peasant girl and a young judge have a brief encounter in the fields, they fantasize about the attractions of life in each other's social station. A simple idea, but with some memorable lines such as those quoted above. I recommend reading the illustrated edition of 1867 and following it with Bret Harte's satirical sequel.
I enjoyed this poem. As others have said, it has a very simplistic and what some might consider to be a cliche story; however, it is elegantly written and presents some good food for thought towards the end.
I read an 1867 version of this book, that belonged to my great great grandfather Jacob Winslow Horton (1827-1893). Beautifully illustrated, poignant, short and sad story--about a love that might have been, but never came to pass.