This feels like a summary of the blog. Which is what I expected and why I’ve given it a miss for so long. For one, from the get-go it’s inferior to the blog since there aren’t any comments. I don’t know how Powell would have worked them in exactly but facts are facts: oftentimes the comments outshone the blog posts. So what’s all new and all different? A recap of Klock’s Clairmont (sic, natch) history (I love Klock’s candor—and his name—but he kind of discredits his entire book.) And a less issue-detailed approach. Otherwise, you’re better off just reading the blog. Oddly, the book is crippled by occasional bits that seem intent on what I can only assume is some kind of virtue-signaling rather than making proper sense:
“As flirted with occasionally in the earliest issues and then reintroduced by Adams and Thomas toward the end of the ’60s, one of the X‑Men’s themes was prejudice, the “mutants” (such as they were) being a kind of all-purpose collective stand-in for any and all disenfranchised minorities. The metaphor was and is problematic for a number of reasons – e.g., most of the X‑Men are white and privileged – which is why the Sentinels turn out to be, as Adams puts it, “such a solid concept.”
This is a paragraph working overtime and double time both to completely miss the big, shiny point, and to gain what exactly? The opportunity to use the word problematic? To vaguely finger-wag and hand-wave away a stupid objection to the realities of a metaphor… yadda, yadda, yadda… like, no duh. Powell isn’t stupid, so maybe he’s one of those people that lost their minds in 2016. It reads like Powell is trying really hard to avoid stepping a land mine that’s not even there if you spend even a tick thinking about it. Alas, fans of the word “problematic” can rejoice, though, Powell uses the term at least half a dozen times.
Overall, skippable unless you have no intention of reading the blog (which is still online but as ever it’s a pain to navigate from post to post.)