From a Creem magazine article, September 1986:
"They sound “awful” – sloppy, hitting wrong notes everywhere, missing cues – and positively, absolutely wonderful. (...) On this particular night, the Replacements are one of the greatest rock’n’roll bands in the universe."
Fair warning: this might be more of a crazed fangirl raving than a proper review, but if you’ve known me a while, that’s what I tend to do with books about music and bands. If you don’t mind, read on. If that annoys you, skip to the final paragraph, just before the quotes.
My husband and I are both music nerds; it was one of the first things we bonded over when we first met, and finding new music and introducing it to each other is still something we love to do. We get all excited and make each other playlists, like teenage dorks. There have been hits (Geoff Berner and Full Bush are household favorites) and misses (he still doesn’t get Laura Stevenson, and I’ll never love Helmet; c’est la vie), but last fall, Jason listened to the No Dogs in Space podcast (if you are a music nerd, especially an alternative and punk nerd, you should be listening to No Dogs in Space) series about the Replacements and he almost lost his mind. It was obvious that he'd run into something very, very special. He made me a playlist, we binged the podcast during our Christmas Montreal-Rochester drive, and I immediately became equally obsessed with this weird, and inexplicably not world-famous band from Minnesota. Late to the party is sort of my M.O., and in my defence, I was born the year they released "Let It Be"...
But I have to say, I am borderline furious that this music was out there literally my entire life, and I just found out about it, like… a few months ago! The only people I knew who had heard of them were my Gen X music nerd friends, and not even all of them! As the band Art Brut so eloquently put it in their song ‘The Replacements’:
“I can't believe I've only just discovered the Replacements
How have I only just found out about the Replacements?
Some of them are nearly as old as my parents
How have I only just found out about the Replacements?”
In all my books on the history of punk (and I have a lot of those!), I have only found one that bothers to mention the Replacements and I was wondering why that was. Until I read this book... Now, it makes a little bit more sense. Still, kudos to Brian Cogan for having an (albeit small) entry about them in his “Punk Encyclopedia”.
The Replacements came to be in Minneapolis in 1978, when Paul Westerberg somehow took over the Stinson brothers’ band Dogbreath, installed himself as the lead singer, changed the band’s name and influenced the sound and feel of the music by giving the rest of the band some punk records. So while they started out as a punk band, they quickly felt limited by the scene’s ‘standards’ and their sound quickly evolved into something very stylistically diverse and nuanced – but their reputation as a loose cannon live act soon preceded them: they would either be unbelievably brilliant on stage, or too wasted to play properly – and they sometimes deliberately ruined their own sets to antagonize the crowd if they didn’t like their vibe. They were contemporaries of Hüsker Dü and R.E.M. but never managed to get anywhere near their level of fame and success because they were too dysfunctional as a band to do what needed to be done for their careers to truly take off (my favorite description of them is 'the little engine that could but didn't fucking feel like it') – while simultaneously/accidentally cultivating a rabid fanbase who adored them for their antics almost as much as for their music. Their way of doing things was unsustainable, and after many ups, downs, firing, re-hiring and re-firing, the band called it quits in 1991 and eventually did a brief reunion tour around 2013 before parting ways yet again. They are now the stuff of underground music legends, a band of incredible talent that got in its own way at every turn, which has given them a powerful and enduring mystique.
I have read a ton of rock biographies in my life, and very often, what happens with those books is that they are either hagiographies written by devoted fans who won’t address the dark or weird sides of the artists they write about, or the pacing is terrible because they get mired in irrelevant details and make you feel like you are reading an extremely long and badly written Wikipedia article. Both of those kinds of rock bios drive me nuts, and I was a bit nervous about this one, but I shouldn’t have fretted: Bob Mehr is a fan, but he is also a great music journalist (and talented writer, I might add), and he talked with the former/surviving band members themselves (except Chris Mars, who declined to be involved in the project), as well as over 200 people who had known them or worked with them in some capacity. I'll join the chorus of people who say this is the best rock bio they have ever read: there wasn't a page of this door-stopper that didn't knock me on my ass.
Reading this book, one quickly learns that to love the Replacements means you have to be willing to embrace chaos and the fucked-up sides of these four contrarian weirdos. And yes, there are descriptions of some pretty epically dickish behavior in this book, but I have long stopped expecting musicians to behave much differently, especially when there is booze or drugs involved, so it didn’t really spoil my enjoyment of the book – or taint my opinion of the guys themselves. You are telling me that Paul Westerberg, who might be the most brilliant songwriter of his generation, is a jerk? Color me shocked… If anything, the generalized messiness makes the story of the band even more compelling than it would have been, had those guys not been fucked up contrarians of the finest kind.
Since the podcast used this book as one of its primary sources, a lot of the stories here were familiar, but it was wonderful to revisit them and get more details about the greatest rock band who ever failed at making it big. Their story is equal parts hilarious ("I'm not complaining, Jim, but I'm just curious: how DID they get the vomit on the ceiling?") and tragic, so it’s an interesting experience to go from one extreme emotion to another while learning about their lives. If the band had been less wasted and more willing to compromise even a little bit, I am convinced that they would have been huge, because their talent is mind-blowing – even when they were trashed out of their minds – but that didn’t happen both because of their behavior and because of some truly shit luck.
If there is any real takeaway from their story, it’s that nothing is quite as simple as just playing the game or sticking to your principles while navigating the treacherous waters of the recording industry. I read an article that describes Paul Westerberg as someone who skipped being a star on his way to becoming a legend, and I seriously can’t think of a better way to put it. Whether that was by design or not is an interesting question, given that the band refused to pander to anyone – the audience, record label people, anyone who could have helped, really! The self-sabotage is truly impressive, in a shattering sort of way, but I am quite certain that fame and fortune would not have exorcised any of those men’s demons. In fact, I am shocked at how brutal and bleak their pre-band lives were, and I have come to believe that their music was their literal salvation – I am not sure any of them would have made it past thirty if they hadn’t taken this road. Not that it ended well for everyone… One could argue that the story of the Replacements is also a really upsetting case study about of how toxic masculinity hurts men.
In fact, this is something very special about this particular rock bio: most books like this describe their subjects’ horrible behavior, sure, but few bother to tell the readers where this behavior comes from. And these guys had it rough from the get-go. Bob Stinson suffered horrific abuse at his stepfather’s hands on top of untreated mental illness, and his entire adult life was heart-breaking. All four of the band members suffered head injuries in their early years and there was generational alcoholism and untreated trauma, depression, and anxiety disorders all over their backgrounds. It doesn’t really excuse things, of course, but at least there is some context to make sense of the deviant behaviors and reckless shenanigans that made them famous and simultaneously tanked their rock star dreams.
I think that this may be why people who love them feel so passionately about them: their music is not the only thing about them that indicates that they felt alienation in such a visceral way, and anyone who has ever felt that in their own lives gets tremendous comfort from their art, but also, simply, from their existence. I know I’m very new here, in the Replacements fan demographic, but I totally get why people who love this band are as rabidly obsessed as they are. Reading about all the adversity and madness they endured actually made me admire them even more than I would have just from listening to the records - especially since I now have the stories behind every song, making them even more impactful when I listen to them.
I will not repeat every insane anecdote documented here, but this is almost 500 pages of delightful and often horrifying stories (including the best groupie story I have ever read), and I can’t help but admire the pure panache with which these guys did their thing. It was snotty, irresponsible, and unhealthy, but I wanted to clap enthusiastically at their antics all the time. They might have stopped playing punk, but they never stopped being punk, and I love them for it so fucking much.
Discovering them and falling in love with their music so long after their active years is an interesting process. In some ways, it feels like I accidentally joined a weird underground cult. I will always be mad I wasn’t the right age (or, you know, born) when bands like the Clash, the Cramps and Black Flag were at their zenith, and now we can add the Replacements to the list of bands I’d catch live if I ever get access to a time machine (please ping me if you have a time machine). It's often stunning to listen to their records, look at the dates and then realize that without the Replacements, there would be no Pixies, and no Nirvana... Actually, one could even argue that plenty of rockers who came to fame in the 90s worked decently hard at sounding, looking and behaving a bit (or a lot!) like Paul Westerberg. I have been looking through my music collection and I see the influence of the 'Mats in general, and of Westerberg specifically, on some of my favorite albums and tracks and it makes me laugh (I also found out I had been listening to one of his songs, ‘Stain Yer Blood’, since grade school – long story – and I had no idea who he was this whole time!). I might have just discovered them a few months ago, but in a weird way, they sounded familiar because they were… kind of everywhere, albeit indirectly (for instance, I just realized my Thomas Ligotti short story collection’s cover art was made by Chris Mars, WTF!).
If you like the band, read this book. If you enjoy rock bios, read this book - it’s truly a masterclass on writing about musicians. If you have never heard of the Replacements before, get a copy of "Sorry Ma, Forgot To Take Out the Trash", "Stink", “Hootenanny”, “Let It Be”, “Tim” and “Pleased to Meet Me” (I actually recommend getting the entire discography, but those records are the core classics) and read this book. Preferably while wearing your rattiest flannel shirt. This book reconnected me to the feeling that made me want to make music in the first place, and that's a treasure of a feeling.
A few quotes:
“Replacements partisans were, on the whole, literate, dark-humored, and a bit confused about their place in the world. They weren’t the go-getters or yuppie types, but they weren’t hopeless wastrels either. They were, Tommy Stinson would note, ‘more like us than they fuckin’ knew. They didn’t really fit anywhere. They probably didn’t aspire to a whole lot, but they also didn’t aspire to doing nothing either. That’s the kind of fan we probably appealed to most: the people that were in the gray area. Just like us.’”
“Still, Westerberg never took the power of his songs, his ability to connect with listeners, for granted. ‘People always come up and say, “You wrote this just for me,” he noted. ‘And I say, “Yeah, I did. I don’t know you, but I knew you were out there.”’
"'He [Bob Dylan] just walked in and started talking to the band,' recalled engineer Cliff Norrell. 'He was saying, "My kid loves you; my son's really into your band." You could see their eyes light up, and then Dylan goes, "You're R.E.M., right?"'"
"Davino [touring sound technician] gamely battled the band's ridiculous volume. "You always heard that Motorhead was the loudest band ever, and I used to say bullshit. Motorhead was pussies compared to dese (sic) guys.""
"Tommy would tell reporters he found it far easier to work with his current bandmate in Guns N' Roses than his old Replacements partner. "He keeps pulling out the 'Paul Westerberg's more difficult to deal with than Axl Rose' line," said Westerberg. "And I think, 'Yeah, of course. Wouldn't Van Gogh be more difficult than Norman Rockwell?'"