So, I rarely do reviews, I just don't have time for it. But this book... my goodness. I'm only giving it 3 stars, because I absolutely LOVE the premise. Emphasis on premise. The book itself was alright, I found the characters likeable, and the setting was cool. However, when I read a scifi novel, I'm entirely willing, and prepared to have a suspension of disbelief. Teleporting beams that completely deconstruct you, and then reconstruct you? Sure. Seemingly magical floating AI's that can analyze DNA to determine identity? Fine. Crash landing into a thing of jello, and coming out unharmed? Totally. BUT. When you take science that we have, knowledge we've already attained, and present it incorrectly?? Then I have a huge problem. Just because you're writing a scifi novel, doesn't mean you get to rewrite science, unless it's intentional and serves the plot somehow. You don't get to skip doing scientific research for your novel because you think "Hey! I am writing a science fiction novel after all." No way. So while Miller's plot, and characters weren't dreadful, I almost couldn't enjoy the novel for all the blaring mistakes. And now, I'm going to proceed by writing out all the errors I found while reading this, please bear with me. (I'm sorry, I'm an astrophysics and biology major I can't help myself). Oh, and don't worry. I have quotes. Oh, and spoilers ahead!!
1) "She walked towards the closest window to observe a light show as shooting stars playfully chased each other across a black canvas."
So this was pretty early in the novel, but after Aimee is on the ship and they were travelling through space. Now you may be wondering, what's wrong with this? Well, let me tell you a little about shooting stars. Shooting stars are meteors, meteoroids burning up in our atmosphere. Theoretically speaking, any atmosphere on any planet would do. So what's wrong with Aimee seeing shooting stars? You can't see them in interstellar space because there is no atmosphere??? I mean, fine, fine, easy mistake to make. You may be thinking, "Beth, stop being a nerd and freaking out over nothing." This isn't what bothered me, I just shrugged this one off when I read it, but just wait. It gets worse.
2) "Stars twinkled with a vibrancy she’d never witnessed before."
Again, this is when Aimee is travelling through space. Stars would not appear to twinkle in space, the twinkling of stars is caused by turbulent air in earths atmosphere, so if you were in space with no atmosphere, there wouldn't be a twinkle in the stars, they'd just appear as dots in space. Again, relatively easy mistake to make, not that big of a deal. The astro major in me cringed, but nothing I couldn't shrug off. I'm not that bad, believe me. You'll see what sets me off below.
3) " "Time. You equate that to a span of life...We see time as a unit of distance, or a measure of travel." [said Vodu]
"I understand that," she offered. "A light year is a measure of time, not distance." "
Note: I literally screamed in disgust at this point. This is when I realized that the author did not, in fact, do ANY scientific research whatsoever. Not even a quick google search. Because I implore you, right now, open a new tab, and type in "light year" into google, and tell me what you find. Because you won't find that light years are a measure of time. Light years are a measure of distance, NOT TIME WTF, that's literally the biggest rookie mistake ever, you don't need a degree in astrophysics to know that. You don't even need to have taken a physics class to know that, all it takes is a google search. This is honestly appalling. A light year is the unit of distance that measures how far light travels in a year. And you know what, I took a deep breath after reading this, and gave the author the benefit of the doubt, assuming that Vodu (the commander of the Horus) would correct Aimee, and this would all be one big learning lesson. But oh no, I put my faith in the wrong author because instead, Vodu goes on to be impressed by her "understanding" of time, and says how lucky the Horus would be to have her working there. The author literally just looked at the word year, and went, hmm, must be a unit of time. *internally and externally screaming*
4) "A strange sound ensued. Something electric—like kinetic energy—or a sparkler."
????? "Like kinetic energy"??? What does that even mean? Kinetic energy isn't electric, well not inherently. A type of kinetic energy is, indeed, electric, but what does that have to do with it sounding like kinetic energy. Like wtf? This is literally high school physics. Kinetic energy is the energy of motion, I don't understand how this relates to a buzzing electric sound. Ugh.
5) " “I have a different chromosomal makeup than the people of Anthum.”
No kidding. The passengers on the Horus all were fair in color, but Zak—Zak definitely had a unique genetic makeup. [thought Aimee]"
What. The. HELL??? Ummm, where to even start?? I thought he was human (or mecaw), you can't be human and have a different chromosomal makeup without it being some kind of genetic disorder. And also, what bothers me most is Aimee's conclusion that, yeah, he has a different chromosomal makeup because he LOOKS different in hair colour and skin complexion. Like, what?? That's such an illogical conclusion. Differences in hair colour and skin colour are caused by different alleles on the same gene, not different chromosomes. Has Aimee never seen a Spanish person, or an Indian person, or a Kenyan?? Has she never left small town America? Because according to her, the fact that Zak has a darker skin tone and hair colour, results in him having a different chromosomal makeup. Which, may I add, is not the same as having a different genetic makeup. Not really.
6) "She was almost twenty-three-years-old. Her body might reflect that, but her mind felt much older."
Okay, so this was talking about how the time on the Horus run "slower" than the time on earth. So, on the Horus it had only been a few months, while one earth it had been 5 years. So, Aimee has been on the Horus, not earth, and yet she's aged like she's somehow been on earth. Why? Because she's from earth? And somehow her body's been aging according to earth time?? That's not how time works?? Listen, clearly Maureen Miller, you have done no research on the topic you're writing, other than maybe searching up a few science terms you thought sounded cool. Aimee doesn't age based on earth time, that's so dumb??? She ages based on whatever time she's living in. The way time dilation works is through relativity. So on the Horus, let's say 7 days have passed. For people on the Horus, those feel like 7 normal days, and they age accordingly to those 7 days. And let's say in that same amount of time, 2 years have passed on earth, those 2 years feel normal for the people on earth. You age according to whatever reference frame you're in. So Aimee would return to earth 5 years after she'd left, but she wouldn't have aged that, she would've aged whatever amount of time she spent on the Horus, so one month, or a few months. She would've still been 17 or 18, however old she was. Not 23. Ughhhhhh.
Alright, I'm done my rant. These are just the things I managed to catch, but also, if any of my own science is wrong feel free to call me out! I'd really appreciate it. I'm sorry if this felt aggressive to anyone, or angry, but it was, and I am. I'm just feeling frustrated that Miller couldn't be bothered to do a google search. This honestly isn't rocket science, and I hope her future books reflect better research. Alright, done.