okay. this one is difficult. i LOVE hannah hart with all of my heart-o, so i believe i need to go a bit far afield, before diving into this. if you don't want to deal with any feelings head to the section that has + and - in it and read the bold titles only.
i think it was randy pausch who told a story about his football coach who was pretty tough on him and the coach's assistant said, "that's a good thing [...] when you're screwing up and nobody says anything to you anymore, that means they've given up on you." pausch said about this "you may not want to hear it, but your critics are often the ones telling you they still love you and care about you, and want to make you better." now of course - of COURSE - that is not always true. not every critic "cares about you". but it is true for me. i still think hannah hart is an amazing, kind, funny, and a puppy-like person you can't help but fall in love with because that's just how wonderful she is.
now, some of you will rewind a bit and say "yeah, yeah, sweet talk all you want, but hey, that's a bit harsh, are you saying hannah hart screwed this book up? why give it two stars if you like her so much?" again, bear with me. hannah hart did not "screw this one up" at all. her writing is, at times, excellent. so. here it goes:
-style. i say her writing is "at times" excellent. so what does that mean? well, some of her writing is simply advertisement. it's like someone once said to her "hey, advertisement is important!" and she went with it, and she even advertises her own book, inside her book. like, it's okay, hannah, i am literally holding the book in my hands. i have bought it. i don't need more advertisement for it. i got it. it's all good. we're good, fam. i got the book.
apart from that, it's really a little confusing. some of her writing, some chapters, are incredibly well-written, and i wonder if the reason why not all of them are as excellent, is of a time-related nature. that if she hadn't written it so quickly, it would have been not only "another youtuber biography, albeit contesting an incredibly important societal matter", but potentially a true piece of art, something that goes into history as a classic, you know? it could have been both, and in those few chapters/moments throughout her book that are so well-written, so sincere, so real, she shows us she could absolutely have done it. but some chapters are simply copy-pasted diary-entries, and it's not that they do not fit into the style, rather than what's around them. since hart seems to gloss over these in her usual chipper way, the gap between the heaviness of some of these and her tone are estranging to put it mildly.
-structure in general. why hannah hart did not write three or more books is beyond me. one about her life as a famous youtuber, getting there, the business, a socialite who tried drugs (although that chapter was rather out of place in my opinion, especially since: what was the moral? what was she trying to say? "i tried drugs, it was interesting, let me write about it"? i don't know. she has many very young fans, and i felt like that chapter was handled a little "oh well, drugs are okay for some, it's not for me personally, but let me tell you about how great this one time was except for a little bit at the end that was meh" - without mentioning how many accidents can happen with drugs, or literally any other real connection to the rest of the book? it felt like a filler that wasn't following the common thread of her story at all. and that has nothing to do with the style of writing itself), one about her romantic experiences and one about her childhood and the fight for her mentally ill mother who is trapped, like millions of others, in a system that is working against them.
maybe if she had structured the book into three parts plus a fun part where "casual travel asshole" (btw i agree with and do most of the things in that chapter, great advice for flying) comes in. but the way it was structured, it felt inconsistent and like a ball of "gnyah".
+wlw. has ooey gooey chapter about her first girlfriend which is absolutely heart-warming and poetic and sweet. as a queer person, it's therapy to read a sapphic woman's experience with love.
+it is brave. hannah hart must have gone through so much crazy shit and it is so impressive, inspiring even, to see where she is today. her book sounds sometimes like it's only scratching on the surface of how painful and traumatic her childhood and fight against the system must have been for her.
+the political idea behind. there clearly is a problem with the system and how people handle mental illness nowadays, and not just in america. it is important to have someone speak up about this.
BOTTOM LINE: if you love hannah hart: read the book, it'll give you insight. if you're into fighting the system about mental health: read the last few chapters. but if you're expecting a literary master-piece: wait for her next book, maybe. i really feel like she could get there. it doesn't need much more. maybe just some editing.
ps.: i am so torn about writing this, because i love hannah hart so much, but i also feel like as a literature-student i have a certain obligation to speak my most honest opinion about a literary piece, even if it's not all rosy.
pps.: i keep going back to this and giving it 3 stars and then changing my mind, so please see it as a 2.5, between "it's ok" and "i liked it"