The majority of these stories seems like they're aimed at a lower age level. Might be good for a younger audience, but I expected different. I'm not sure if it is on purpose or if many of the authors are just really inexperienced writers.
I know these are supposed to be fairytales, but this isn't old oral tales written down, this is new reinvention. Maybe put some actual effort into fleshing out the stories and characters, so things make proper sense? Or so it isn't just a actual retelling of the fairytales without anything new?
The queer point are often very poorly woven into the story or not even tried to. It's glaring. I expected beautiful stories about queer characters, and got poorly (re)written fairytales with a "you're valid as you are." smacked in the middle. Which, yeah, I agree, but it just wasn't very well executed. Very much telling instead of showing.
This book also really needed a good editor. Both for the basic stuff like typos and missing words etc. - which there was a lot of - but also for the content. A lot of the stories could've improved with a bit of editing.
Honestly, while the length might've been difficult for the authors to work with, I definitely liked how short each story was. It would have been very difficult to get through otherwise. I only kept reading to find hidden gems. Didn't find any. Maybe a few shiny rocks, though.
I don't regret buying this, though, but only because I like supporting projects like this, whether it's just books with LGBTQ+ characters or books that donate.
Handsome and Beast - Laura Nepenthes
Doesn't seem very well though out. Seems like they just took the fairytale and put very little effort into their own story. The message is nice, but the story is a little weak.
The Grateful Princess - Rachel Sharp
Again doesn't seem thought out. The entire story is based on the princess being raised as a peasant, never knowing her identity, but there is no cause for that.
It seems like they were given the prompt of writing a fairytale and just put in stuff from the genre, but didn't bother making it make sense.
Odd - Amy Michelle
Better written than the first two. Almost follows the fairytale exactly except for the end, and some at times very glaring points about identity that doesn't really get woven in until the end either. I suppose it is a twist ending, but I found it predictable.
Expectations - Bec McKenzie
When the strong handsome knight turns out to be a princess who are here to 'rescue' the same princess as you, what do you do? What if you didn't even want anything to do with this whole thing in the first place? Normally in stories like this, the main character would've been the princess who is tired of being told what to do and becomes a knight, but here we get it from a prince who doesn't want to be the hero who gets the girl.
Li Chi and the Dragon - Saffyre Falkenbetg
As far as I can tell, this is an exact retelling of the "Li Chi Slays the Serpent" fairytale told from a 1st-person view and the addition of a female love interest.
I think the author was going for a particular style, but the absence of contractions etc. only makes the narration stiff and stilted, and it's uncomfortable to read. Despite the 1st-person narration it works to keep the reader at an emotional distance from the main character.
Satin Skirts and Wooden Shoes - Moira C. O'Dell
Well done fairytale, that made good use of the source material. It worked really well that no one was given names (unlike in some of the first stories where names were given even thought they didn't matter and it felt glaring against the setting) Had a somewhat bittersweet ending that also worked well.
I wish that this had been placed elsewhere in the anthology, though, as it share an exact plot point with McKenzie's "Expectations", and they're only divided by one story.
Match Sticks- Minerva Cerridwen
Really, really sweet.
Ending was predictable though.
The Princess of the Kingdom of the Dark Wood - Dominique Cypres
Well-done fairytale. Beautifully executed sweet story.
Damma and the wolf - Kassi Khaos
Really interesting - especially for working with such a well-known fairytale.
Beauty's Beasts - Elspeth Willems
This seemed a lot more serious? in tone than many of the other stories. It was good. The characters also seemed more like persons rather than fairytale characters.
Glass Mountains - Will Shughart
A really well-done fairytale, but I found myself unable to root for the love story because of how the protagonist treated his former love. The characters seemed to teeter on the edge between being fleshed out and just being flat fairytale characters.
Brenna - Emmy Clarke
Very little about this story makes sense and frankly it wasn't very good.
The Last Lost Boy - George Lester
While all the other stories have been based on fairytales (you could ague about Beauty and the Beast, but none of the stories seems to be based on the novel) this one is based on Peter Pan, a play and a novel.
This story is longer than the others and not like a fairytale at all. I mean it's very good and well written, like a proper short story, but it seems like it belongs to a different anthology.
Dark Matters - Tiffany Rose
I wasn't really into the premise of this story. It was actually well written, but I just didn't find it appealing.
The Suns of Terre - Will J. Fawley
Seems like it belongs in a different anthology.
A sci-fi story about a father who puts a shock collar on his own son and makes a plan for after his death, where the son, after years of pain that immobilizes him at times, has to make the decision between right and wrong himself. Gross premise and not very well executed, really. The prose is good, but there's just things that doesn't make sense.