It's quite interesting how we're so used to the social constructions embedded into our general knowledge of fertilization. I enjoyed how Martin laid everything bare and called out each and every "injustice."
Such an extraordinary piece! I got to know it thanks to the short reference from Martha Kenney's Fables of response-ability to feminist science studies. I intend to read the other referred texts as well. But this one, couldn't be any better. It seems to be extremely relevant, as the concept of "narrative design" expands, and is a fantastic work from Emily Martin. Emily does a major research on how the mating moment, thus the union egg-sperm, is described: not from an historical, archaeological point of view, but from a snapshot of modern narratives. In doing so, she identifies the different ways of telling the facts, the different narratives possible for the very same phenomenon, and how the cultural background of the researchers (forgetting about an intentionality) shapes the way they are finally explained and perpetuate the gender roles. It's a great introduction to the "it matters how tells stories" and how they are told, from Haraway, and also kind of a continuation about how facts are created in the lab, a demystification of the whole process, which is now subject to the researchers themselves, making the scientific story a subjective one.