Detective Superintendent Steve Fulcher was experiencing a quiet weekend when he was the senior officer on call in March 2011. But mid-evening on Saturday 19 March he received a call that changed his whole life. It concerned a missing 22-year-old girl and he changed and rushed immediately to Swindon police station to join in the action to find the missing girl.
He was subsequently appointed the Senior Investigating Officer (SIO) on the enquiry team that was named Mayan. Plenty of resources were put onto the team and extensive searches by police officers and the supportive public followed. But nothing was forthcoming and no sightings were initially picked up on the various CCTV cameras in the Swindon area where Sian O'Callaghan had gone missing after leaving a night club.
Then an observant officer spotted a grainy image that led to the investigation taking a positive turn. Sian was spotted but then she disappeared in the headlights of a nearby car. Sian disappeared from the CCTV images thereafter so it was suspected that the driver of the car had picked her up. But what was the make of the car? It was difficult to pick out but then another observant officer found CCTV images from another camera that not only helped identify the make of car but, remarkably, produced a registration number. And the car proved to be a taxi as a distinguishing mark on its nearside illustrated.
With so much information the driver was identified and questions were asked of the taxi firm, who gave details of the driver's evening's movements on the night in question. So as not to give away the fact that they had a lead on him DS Fulcher told the press that all taxi drivers were going to be asked about their movements on the night when Sian went missing. So the driver in question, Christopher Halliwell, was interviewed and his account of the night did not match that of the taxi firm details. This discrepancy put him right in the frame for the abduction of Sian.
DS Fulcher was working all possible hours in an attempt to find Sian and he hoped beyond hope that she had been incarcerated and not killed. The pressure was put on Halliwell and eventually DS Fulcher decided the time was right to let him know that he was their prime suspect. Initially he denied all knowledge of Sian's disappearance but as the pressure mounted he began to crack.
DS Fulcher applied all the pressure without jeopardising the investigation and eventually he wormed a confession out of the suspect and even talked him into telling them where he had left Sian. And in doing so Halliwell admitted to another abduction some eight years earlier and he took the police to the spot where he had left Sian's body and talked of burying the other girl he had abducted in a field. [He later mentioned some 60 killings to another prisoner when in jail but nothing could come of this 'confession'.]
While this exchange of views was going on DS Fulcher decided not to read Halliwell his rights because he realised, quite rightly, that it could well prevent the bodies of two young girls from being found. This apparently is against the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) codes of practice but in the circumstances DS Fulcher decided that this was the right way to tackle the problem to get closure on the case. At the time his senior officers agreed with him.
Sian's body was eventually found in a ditch but the other young girls's Becky's, body was not where the police originally thought it was; it was, however, subsequently discovered. And, from having confessed when out in the open countryside, Halliwell suddenly offered 'No Comment' to any questions that were asked of him when he returned to Swindon police station. And the same situation existed when he went to court.
Unbelievably this brought into question the actions that DS Fulcher had originally taken and the breaking of the PACE code of practice came into question. DS Fulcher was suspended and removed from the investigation. This brought a real furore from the press and public alike with one family member from one of DS Fulcher's previous murder investigations writing to the Daily Telegraph saying, 'I am so angry about this. The idea that his skills and experience and compassion are going to be lost simply because the rules are not fit for purpose is simply outrageous. No one seems to care about the rights of victims. It is all about the rights of criminals. Now this is even taking precedence over the right of the police to do their jobs.'
And, from reading this graphic and detailed account of an abduction/murder investigation, there seems no doubt that had DS Fulcher not taken the action he did Sian's body could well not have been discovered and no-one would have known the whereabouts of Becky's body. Absolutely surprisingly Halliwell went to trial over Sian's murder but was not initially tried over the death of Becky. He was, not surprisingly with all the evidence that had been gathered, found guilty and sentenced to jail and, thank goodness, some years later he was convicted over the death of Becky and his term of imprisonment was increased to life.
Sadly DS Fulcher suffered a breakdown over the whole affair, was moved to other duties but subsequently returned to Swindon. However, he found the situation intolerable and eventually resigned from the force; scandalous action to have to take for so committed an officer, who had given everything to his police work throughout his career. It was not only a personal loss, it was a financial loss as well but he felt that life would be much better with less money and no stress or stigma attached to him.
I have seen such murder investigations on television documentaries but there is nothing to compare with the insider knowledge and intricate detailing that DS Fulcher brings to this harrowing tale.