[Disclaimer: I received a free e-copy of this book from NetGalley for review purposes.]
THERE ARE SPOILERS IN THIS REVIEW, although when you get to my point about predictability you'll understand they aren't that much of a revelation.
Ignoring the fact that this is book three in a series of undetermined length, and the description on NetGalley didn't *really* give an indication there were other books before it (although I suppose you could interpret the last line of the description as that indication, but it didn't include any solid information about how many books came before), I gave this one a fair shot. I did not feel that I needed to read any of the previous books to understand what was happening in this one, because the author gave *so much* backstory throughout that reading them now would be a let-down.
In giving the book a fair shot, I also realized I had no interest in the other two books, especially if they were written the same way as this one. The story had good possibilities, but the writing fell flat and in the end I was left completely unsatisfied. I felt it was completely predictable from start to finish, and a good chunk of it didn't make much sense.
I'll go in list form:
* The author refers to most characters by titles instead of names, and constantly. For example, "the potentate," "the curator," "the monsignor," "the beast," etc. And it wasn't just an occasional thing to switch up between the title and their name. Rarely is the monsignor referred to by Albert. Once we hear the curator's real name, he's never referred to by it again. We are told that the pope is Pope Francis, but once that's out he's just simply the pope. And I don't remember ever hearing the potentate's real name, but that didn't stop the author from saying the word "potentate" five times in the first two paragraphs.
* Cloe says "Oh my God!" a LOT, and especially in front of clergy. I know when I'm in church or around clergy, I do my best to stay away from the OMG phrasing. Wouldn't someone who's supposedly as super-Catholic as Cloe do the same? There are other clergy-friendly ways to express shock and dismay.
* What is the time frame of this book? Days? Weeks? Months? It feels like it takes only a couple of weeks, but in that time already we have widespread famine and plague that have killed millions. How long has this unrest been going on? There is no clear indication of any lengths of time, except at the end of the book when we get a wrap-up one week after the final battle. The framing of time makes zero sense.
* Why does every random building they have to escape from have a convenient secret passage or back way out that no one knows about? One time, maybe two is OK, but three or more and we're talking laziness.
* How old is the monsignor supposed to be? He talks like an old man but fights/acts like a young soldier.
* Like I said before, it was 100% predictable. Cloe is wondering who the 7 are? Well duh, it's the seven random people who show up in New Orleans. When she puts that information together, it's like we're supposed to be having a lightbulb moment with her. But I'm not, because I figured that out from the second I was told there were cards being handed out to random people by a purported angel. The spy? That was obvious from the moment the character was introduced. She made an off-handed comment, Cloe wonders at it, we hear possible distrust once more... of course she's the spy. How could she not be?
* Icar falls victim to trope - he's a classic villain who puts too much of the important work into the hands of his minions. Michael is tasked with killing Cloe and Robby but doesn't, when Icar could have easily done it himself. Cloe was right in front of him. We see later that he has no qualms about snapping someone's neck. If he really wanted them both dead, why not do it himself? If he's so powerful, he wouldn't have been so easy to escape from, or so easily defeated (and really, that ending? He went down easy). And when Michael is chasing the group on the river in his own boat, the spy was on the "good" boat, so why not just have her do away with everyone? She had military training and a gun. I'm sure she could have handled it. Killing them was the goal at that point. The fact they were able to escape when one of Icar's team was right there with them is a big plot hole.
* The end was completely unsatisfying. The last sentence made the entire book feel like it was cut off mid-thought. I pushed the page trying to get to the next one (because in my copy the last sentence was the very end of the page) several times until I realized no, that's the end. Of the book. That's how this book ends.
There was a lot of potential here. The author clearly has some talent. But there was too much stereotype, too much revealed early and then acting like it was an ah-ha moment later, too much too much. I am not a fan, won't be picking up the others, and really don't recommend this to much of anyone.