Married for twenty years to Edward Berry, Lyddie is used to the trials of being a whaler's wife in the Cape Cod village of Satucket, Massachusetts—running their house herself during her husband's long absences at sea, living with the daily uncertainty that Edward will simply not return. And when her worst fear is realized, she finds herself doubly cursed. She is overwhelmed by grief, and her property and rights are now legally in the hands of her nearest male her daughter's overbearing husband, whom Lyddie cannot abide. Lyddie decides to challenge both law and custom for control of her destiny, but she soon discovers the price of her bold "war" for personal freedom to be heartbreakingly dear. Includes the fascinating "story behind the story" of The Widow's War , a map of colonial Brewster, and a driving tour of the village of Satucket.
A lifelong resident of New England, Sally Cabot Gunning has immersed herself in its history from a young age. She is the author of six critically acclaimed historically themed novels: The Widow’s War, Bound, The Rebellion of Jane Clarke, Benjamin Franklin’s Bastard, Monticello: A Daughter and Her Father, and her latest novel, released June 2021, Painting the Light. Elected fellow of the Massachusetts Historical Society and president of The Brewster Historical Society, she has created numerous historical tours of her village.
Her work has appeared in The Washington Post, The Daily Beast, and an assortment of short story anthologies.
She lives with her husband Tom in Brewster, Massachusetts.
Historical fiction at its best. Story of a woman struggling to retain a little autonomy at a time in American history that did not allow for this. After her husband dies, the widow of the title is determined to hold onto as much of her independence as possible but the law of the land dictates that she is now under the care of her closest male relative, a boorish son-in-law. She uses as much of the law as she can to fight the system. A fascinating look into life in New England in the mid-1700s.
This book was a cheap purchase on my Nook and it has been given great reviews but I am not a fan. I really liked Gunning's description of an 18th century whaling village on Cape Cod; I thought the descriptions were beautiful, but that is about all I liked. I thought it was a bodice ripper disguised as historical fiction. I hate it when an author inserts 21st century thinking and mores into historical settings. Within months of her husband dying in a whaling accident, our heroine, Lyddie, has passionate sex with the Indian neighbor, gives up her belief in God, is banned from attending church, and has hot thoughts about her lawyer. Whew! Where did she find the energy to fight with her son-in-law over a widow's right to property, which is the pretext of this novel. I didn't find it to be what it advertised!
Massachusetts, early 1800s, Lyddie Berry finds herself suddenly widowed, and back then the laws stipulated that she has to move in with her son in law- Nathan Clarke (Evil Chauvinist!) and she stands up for herself and decides to live in her 1/3rd of her old house. Interesting to read about the lack of women's rights during this time period. I just wanted so much more! The characters were difficult to connect to, and towards the end I didn't really understand her relationships with the men in her life, I kind of shrugged to myself and thought "What's the point of this?" So many things that didn't really add value to the book.
Sad. I was REALLY liking this book. I would even say I was LOVING this book. I love historical fiction and strong female characters. It was fascinating to learn how the women in the 1760's were treated and what their life was like if they were widowed. I loved the characters in this book and the story/plot was intriguing. However, the last 3rd of the book left me so disappointed -- the characters morals, decisions, and even the plot left me annoyed, disgusted, and completely at odds with this book. It crossed my personal "inappropriate and icky" threshold as well. The book had such promise, but sadly, I can't recommend it nor would I read it again if I'd known where it was headed.
The prose language held a convincing tone for the period. The locale descriptions superlative. We know the people, and their daily tasks and conversation habits. Solid story and the property rights issue was illustrative. But honestly, it was so revisionist in the pace of her changing choices and thoughts on self-identity that it made my believability meter go off like a siren. Women of the mid 18th century don't progress to 20th century choices and sensibilities, let alone actions, with such jumps within such time periods. The entire love triangle angle and much of the events of religious non-belief! Somehow that was just too far "off" perceptions for the time, IMHO. It made a good story, but I'm not sure I would classify this as historical fiction. Much more like period romance to fantasy.
"The girl stayed where she was. 'Mama says Grandpapa's drowned. She says you live with us now. She says you're to have this room for yourself and your own part of the hearth and your own day to use the oven. Mama bakes Friday. What's to be your day to bake?'" (PG. 7)
This was a historical fiction set in Cape Cod, Massachusetts in the year 1761. Lyddie's husband is a whaler and she receives the news she has been fearing for the last 20 years of their marriage; he has died. She can't quite grasp the death or law set out for her. She can only have access to 1/3 of her home and the rest, furniture and animals, pots and pans, goes to the next male in the family, her son-in-law Nathan Clarke. He is looking to sell the home but runs into many problems like the Indian Cowett with equal tree cutting rights of land sharing and his mother-in-law Lyddie is being stubborn into not signing away her 1/3. He wants it all except the responsibility of taking care of Widow Berry, as she is now called.
There were a few things I was questioning the author for in that era, like Lyddie's romances and her choice not to continue with the Sabbath and going to church with everyone else. I feel they would have run her out or lynched her especially as she was a woman with no rights and little virtue per the rumors. I thought the story would have more to do with finding her freedom as a widow through changing the law but this was not so. She had her own story. I would have liked to see her character meet James Otis since he is mentioned many times by her lawyer as an activist/humanitarian set to change the laws making slaves and women equal in law terms giving them education and suffrage alongside the white males.
Despite all my small grievances I can actually say I enjoyed the story and the timeline. Lyddie Berry is someone you root for and we get to know her thoughts and the story is weaved nicely. I wasn't bored throughout the 300 pages.
Okay, I'll try not to gush, because this is not a gushy (is that a word?) kind of book. It's as a hard-as-nails story about a widow living in the 1700's; the choices she had to make (not much choice)and the consequences of her choices.
I love Sally Gunning's writing style and if I had highlighted all the beautiful prose I would have quickly gone over the limit. Very visual, simple, and eloquent.
I couldn't help identifying with the widow since I once lived alone, and even fought the "system" a time or two myself. Sometimes she was very courageous and sometimes she made choices by not making choices. Her hard fought independence did not always make her happy, and she sometimes wondered about her decisions. Yes, that is life.
This is definitely a book I did not want to end, and one that I will read again.
Although I have learned to be cautious about reading sequels, I have already downloaded "Bound." The consequence of that choice remains to be seen...
I wish I could give this book two and a half stars.... It was better than "ok," but it was a bit disappointing. What started off as an interesting historical account of one woman's struggle for independence and a sense of self, soon descended into occasional pornographic descriptions of coupling and soap opera-like intrigue. Really, this could have been a much more serious book, but instead you might almost expect to see Fabio on the cover (wearing a wig, of course).
Interesting novel about an 18th century widow who tries to maintain some independence of thought and action, after the death of her whaler husband of 20 years. She fights against the strictures on women of her day and against her overbearing son-in-law's controlling. Her main ally is a lawyer. Much food for thought here; wow, I'm glad I live in this day and age!
I loved reading this book--it quickly became very obsessive. Most of the time, I read books in snatches here and there, easily setting my book down to attend to the needs of the day; but this book grabbed me and wouldn't permit me to let it go. I postponed dinner and waved my children away: let me finish! I rooted for Lyddie from the first chapter, and I was caught up in her plight for independence, rights and freedom. Acknowledging that my rooting may be influenced by my modern woman's perspective, I nevertheless felt that Gunning stayed true to her 18th century tale--it was an insightful bit of early American historical fiction, and never rang false.
Sally Gunning has done her homework. She knows what Colonial Cape Cod folk ate, read, fished, and cooked. But strangely enough, she also seems to be able to look into their hearts: a widowed woman stubbornly set against signing away her rightful 'widow's thirds' of her husbands estate just to satisfy a son-in-law's greed, a Native American who walks a line between his own nation/beliefs and that of the white man's village, a lawyer who is caught up in the beginning stirrings of ideas about property that will lead to American Independence.
The strength in Lyddie Berry's story aren't the completely believable way that historical period is brought to life, but the way in which the author takes you on the journey her characters take even when their choices are difficult and controversial.
Lyddie Berry's whaling husband dies, and it is the way of those times that she should go to live in her son-in-law's house and be taken care of. But Lyddie doesn't want to be consigned to a corner and have all her worldly posessions controlled by her son-in-law, she wants to make her own way, even if it means tieing her name in a scandalous way to her native american neighbor.
Read The Widow's War to learn history. Read the Widow's war to follow along a nascent feminist in colonial America. Read the Widow's war to cheer and cringe at Lyddie's defiance.
But mostly read The Widow's War to make you ponder where your own limits are; who are you willing to defy, what are you willing to do to make your way in life? And what are the limits of your own self will?
This Book's Food Designation Rating: Corn chowder for the earthy, fundamental tastes of colonial history, with the underlying sweetness of the characters who will linger on your tongue long after the pages are turned.
This started off so promising, but just fell flat. I did appreciate the author's research, and felt she accurately portrayed a typical day in the life of a colonist woman, as well as many of the attitudes and prejudices too. But, I sincerely doubt a woman who was promiscuous, and with a Native American no less, would be able to still remain a relatively cheerful member of society. Sure, she was shunned by the church and church-goers, but somehow I doubt that alone would have been sufficient, in that time period.
Also, and this bothered me more than anything, the plot had many unresolved endings. It began with such intriguing layers, and then, often, just went nowhere. Which, incidentally, seems to be where the sex scenes were inserted. Was the forbidden attraction supposed to get me over the rocky plot? If so, it clearly did not, and in fact, was just one more impediment. I also wondered if perhaps the author was holding back, since she was writing a series, not wanting to reveal too much until the next book. But, if that was the case, she clearly forgot that her current book needed to be well written and intruding enough to entice the reader to continue. And, for me at least, the odds and ends of a story that Widow's War tragically became extinguished any desire to read more by this author. Disappointing, to say the least.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
It is often the small, unknown details of history that can be woven into historical fiction that change our perception of a time or place. In The Widow’s War, Sally Gunning deftly brings to life an aspect of colonial law. Anyone who has studied history knows that life in America in the 1760s was difficult, and that the area of Cape Cod Massachusetts was dependent on the sea, which in turn produced many widows. What may not be known by the average reader was the law which entitled a widow to the life use of one third of her husband’s real estate, with the actual title passing to the nearest living male heir. The Widow’s War not only illustrates the results of this practice it also examines the relationships of Indians and White settlers, the birth of Independence and the rights of man, as well as social mores of the time. Sally Gunning, a native of Massachusetts, has done her homework, and provided the reader with a cleverly imagined exploration of what a young widow in 1761 may experience. Historical fiction can sometimes become dry and dull as it tries to “teach” the reader, and include the necessary facts. Gunning however creates characters that struggle with real human emotion, making them accessible to the modern reader. She is an author to watch!
The things I really liked about this historical novel were the 18th-century colonial Massachusetts setting and the eye-opening look at how few rights women had in colonial times. What I didn't like was the back-and-forth, back-and-forth between the main character, Lyddie, and two men: a Native American neighbor and her lawyer, Eben Freeman. I felt like the author was kind of jerking me around about her relationship with both of them and whether or not the two men were good or bad. It got tedious after a while. But if you like historical novels that illuminate the role of women in history or like books about colonial New England, check it out. Author Sally Gunning also has a new book out, Bound, which revisits some of the characters in this book.
Great read - compelling, page-turning historical fiction with a romantic triangle twist, yet so very LITerary too.
I found this book because the jacket copy in another more recent book, John Smolens' THE SCHOOLMASTER'S DAUGHTER, compared that book to Gunning's. I'm so glad I followed through on that comparison. I tore through this story, although I wanted to savor it. It was that good, so good you hate to put it down because you can't wait to see what happens next. It's a 1760s tale from colonial Massachusetts, set in a tiny fishing village on Cape Cod. Lydia Berry is widowed by a fishing accident in which her husband of 20 years is drowned. Only then does she begin to realize her vassal-like state, as attempts are made to have her sign away all rights to the home her husband had built and where she had given birth to her daughter and her stillborn and short-lived sons. Henceforth she is to be called Widow Berry and is expected to live in a spare room of her daughter's house under the sufferance of her onerous son-in-law, who naturally expects to take over everything that once belonged to Lyddie. She rebels, and refuses to sign the necessary papers that would leave her homeless and beggarly. A local lawyer takes an interest in Lyddie, and in more than a legal manner. So too does her nearest neighbor, known mostly as "the Indian,". He gives her employment, first nursing his sick wife, then (after the wife dies) as a domestic, but this begins to develop into something deeper, although a lifetime of racial predjudice against blacks and "Indians" doesn't just melt away for Lydia. Eyebrows are raised and tongues wag in the community at this reversal of roles and the delicious possiblity of miscegenation.
Lyddie Berry brought to mind another fictional Lydia, the heroine of Molly Gloss's fine novel, THE JUMP-OFF CREEK, set in frontier Oregon in the 1800s. Both are extremely strong and independent characters, despite the separation of an entire continent and more than a hundred years. All of the principals of THE WIDOW'S WAR are many-dimensional and intriguingly human, but Sally Gunning's heroine Lyddie Berry is a character you won't soon forget. If you want a good read that will immediately catch you up, I can't recommend this book highly enough. Go for it!
This was the first Sally Gunning book I read, and definitely also my favorite. Gunning's particular genre is historical fiction set in 18th century New England in the decades before the break out of the Revolutionary War. I've read several of Gunning's books, but The Widow's War remains my favorite because the characters are so compelling. When Lydia's husband dies in a whaling accident, she loses the right to her property and home and becomes the dependent of her really deplorable son-in-law. Her only sliver of independence is her "widow's third", by law she retains use (but not ownership) of 1/3 of her husband's estate, or else 1/3 of the profits from its sale. Making the most of what she has, and with the advice of a reluctant but kind local lawyer, she decides to occupy the third of the house that is hers by law. Her occupation however, prevents the sale that her greedy son-in-law badly wants, and so the widow's war is put in motion. Lydia is a great character, and she makes this a good read.
Gunning's other books are also pre-revolutionary war figures caught up in legal dramas. "Bound" deals with indentured servitude, "The Rebellion of Jane Clarke" is the story of a witness to the Boston Massacre. The author's background as a crime novelist is reflected in the interest in legal procedure, but her characters make even English Common Law into good human drama. The Widow's War though, again, easily my fave.
I enjoyed this interesting, and I suspect, mostly historically accurate novel by Sally Gunning.
This story is all too real, even if the people are not: recently-widowed Lyddie Berry, whose husband drowned during an accident while the local whaling men were at sea off of Cape Cod in January 1761. As was the law back then, almost all of her property and rights immediately moved to her nearest male relative: her obnoxious son-in-law, Nathan Clarke.
But just as she is told to sign the papers formally giving Clarke power over just about everything, Lyddie hears that she actually, by law, has a few rights: one-third of her home, the milk from her cow, and so on. She refuses to sign, and quite the uproar ensues. The story follows what happens as she stands for her rights while also trying to remain in a small Puritan village.
A lot of what is described in this book is quite interesting and no doubt realistic: how Lyddie and the other women live day-to-day; how food is gathered and made; the sights and smells of life in a small fishing and whaling village, etc.
I felt the book veered off course when Lyddie became too independent: she stopped going to Sunday meetings and became close friends with a local "Indian" who had been neighbors with her husband (the author was correct to use that terminology, as that is what the Puritans would have used). I do not think a widow in that day and time would have risked such estrangement from her one and only community that she knew and depended on for everything. The author provides other options, but these explanations seem far-fetched and unrealistic to me.
Overall, a very good historical novel. I highly recommend it if you can get past a couple of the improbable plot points.
This was my library book club pick for the month, but I'm not the right audience for it.
It's historical fiction set in Cape Cod, Massachusetts, circa 1800s. The Widow of the title is a whaler's wife, and is widowed early in the tale. What ensues is an exploration of the lack of rights and agency she has as a woman.
As a reader of both nonfiction and fiction about these themes, there isn't much new here for me. I did however like the nugget that only poor/destitute people ate lobsters and clams in those days. The story was all tell and no show. None of the characters are well fleshed out, and felt like cutouts that the author moved across the pages to make her points. There were also unnecessary and pointless plot lines, and while it's a fast read, I would have DNFed it if not for book club.
It's is however maybe an excellent entry point to readers new to the themes explored here, and while an adult book, would also work for YA readers. I'd collected the other books in this series, and have since un-hauled them all - just don't think Ms. Gunning is for me. For those wondering, other members of my book club mostly loved it.
Although the writing was good and there was plot it felt as though nothing happened. I read through it, and while I was interested in seeing a woman attempting to fight for her rights before women had any sort of right, it was just...slow paced. I liked it but at the same time this was dull and I felt my attention wandering more than once away from this book. A solid 3 ⭐. For historical buffs, you may like this though there is a hefty bit of religion, racism, and sexism in this book.
What a difficult time for women to live and thrive on their own! Lyddie is a strong widow who challenges the laws governing her living situation. The family dynamics are very sad. Enlightening read!
I enjoyed this tale about a widow of a fisherman, in a New England town, during the 1700s. According to the laws of the day, after her husband died, she was to give up most of her possessions, her home and independence. This did not set well with her. She decided to fight against the tide, regardless of the scandal it would cause.
Lyddie Edwards received her widows thirds from her son by marriage because in 1761 it was illegal for a woman to own property. A widow might be entitled to life use of one third of her husbands property but title went to the nearest male heir despite their relative abilities. Lyddie like so many widows of whalers was used to being responsible for herself while her husband, Edward, was at sea. A whalers wife must see to herself, her children and her household for months while the men sailed to trade or to hunt whales. To suddenly revert to her childhood status of dependency was beyond her willingness to bend to societies strictures and restraints. Lyddie saw herself perpetually bent to the whim of her tyrannical son-in-law, Nathan Clarke, in fear of overstepping her widow's proper role. Mourning Edward and filled with regrets for the lost easy companionship she had with her husband Lyddie dreaded the narrowing circumscription she saw as her future. Instead she is inspired by her husband's lawyer and friend, Eben Freeman, to defend her self against her guardian. In increasingly open defiance of all that is expected of a woman she removes herself from his household and returns to take up residence in her third of the house she once lived in. Following this began a a sniping guerilla war between Lyddie and Nathan, her various neighbors, supporters and detractors, as to how much a woman could and should live with the 'liberty of one's own house'. This is not a black and white story with Lyddie the pure and driven woman against the vindictive Nathan, the church, the law, and society. Instead they are all people trying their best to live a difficult time, in a new country with many pressures and diverging goals. No one is right, or wrong, so everyone ends up compromising in some fashion to achieve an answer to the question "Are you content in your house?"
For mystery buffs, while the Edward's death is not a mystery to the men involved Lyddie's understanding of events is. A part of the plot revolves around her piecing together the various tales of Edward's last whale hunt.
Four and a half stars, really. This book was about a woman's struggle for independence in colonial Massachusetts. After being widowed from her fisherman husband, Liddie Berry is swept along in life's changes. She is expected to live the rest of her life with her daughter and jerk of a son-in-law,utterly dependent on them for any money, living space and food. All her belongings were really her husbands, and they all revert to her son-in-law. Liddie, to the surprise of herself as much as anyone, decides at the last minute that she will instead live on her "widow's thirds", one third of the house she and her husband lived on, wood from the woodlot, and a cow.
Liddie, unsurprisingly in this time, has never tried to live on her own. She tries to figure out how to feed herself, make enough money to survive, and get along in town. She is both helped and hindered by Eben Freeman, her husband's lawyer. Sam Cowett, her Indian neighbor whom she had always somewhat feared, becomes a much bigger presence in her life.
There's a fair bit of semi-romance in this book. Liddie has several men interested in her, but she is trying very hard to be true to herself and learn to be alone. I thought that Liddie took this a bit far sometimes. There were times when she could have used just a bit of charm and made life much easier for herself. But Liddie doesn't really believe in charm, she believes in self-examination and trying to be true to herself, even at the expense of severing relationships and putting herself on the outs with the town (a dangerous choice when almost all of her supplies and possible help in case of emergency are there). I did understand her terror at being at the utter mercy of even a well-meaning man.
There's a great quote in the book by Liddie's now-dead husband: "the hardest thing in life is to learn to be half of a whole, and yet whole oneself." I'm not sure I have that exactly right, but it captures the push and pull of a marriage, the effort to be in the most intimate partnership in the world and yet be true to oneself.
I wish the book had contained just a bit more at the end. I wanted to know what happened next.
The Widow's War is exactly that. It is a war based on the rights, both legally and morally, between men and women, religious tolerances and intolerances, Anglo-Saxon and Native American relationships, landowners and the indentured, family commitments and rankings, and the list goes on. It gives thoughts of what once was and what actually still is even in the great passing of time.
This story takes place during the Colonial period in the Cape Cod area. Lyddie Berry becomes a widow upon the death of her whaler husband, Edward, after an accident at sea. His death leaves her questioning the validity of the circumstances leading up to his demise. This incident is one of the shadows that follows her throughout the story.
The hard crust of this story is the insufferable treatment of women in widowhood and their inability to own land and property in a fair distribution. This is the basis for the "widow's third". Widows were at the mercy of the legal system and the family members who carried out the dictates of the will. I've done a lot of family genealogical research and have come upon wills from earlier times that make you gasp at the unfairness to the surviving widow. And this is at the core of the book.
Sally Cabot Gunning has extensively researched the material for her book. She goes to great length to identify the daily, relentless workload of the Colonial woman. Lyddie is burdened beyond belief with the physical trials of survival and is suffocating from the heavy emotional onslaught of her widowhood and its legal entanglements upon her life.
While Lyddie is only 39 years old and is a spirited woman by her very nature, I found her character to encompass more traits of the 21st century woman. Perhaps this was intentional by the author to make her more relatable to the modern woman. I'm sure that there were plenty of feisty women of this time period, but some of her actions and choices seemed hardpressed to believe. If Lyddie was this open-minded and free-thinking, how did she raise a milktoast of a daughter in Mehitable?
Sally Cabot Gunning tells a story well. I am delighted to have come upon this book and look forward to reading more from this author.
I like historical fiction and when it's well done I enjoy it all the more. The Widow's War is both an intriguing story and a social study on the structure of a 1700 century whaling village in Massachusetts.
Lyddie Berry has taken good care of her home and her family for 20 years while her successful whale hunting husband is away. Her constant worry is that her husband will not return home. This sad case is exactly what happens at the start of the story.
In the midst of her grief she must also come to terms with losing her autonomy; her property and rights are now in the hands of her nearest male relative. Unfortunately in her case this is her domineering son-in-law. Finding herself unable to live under his roof, she struggles against complying with his wishes. Under the law, she is entitled to one third of the house she shared with her husband or one third the profit from its sale along with only the goods she brought to her marriage some twenty years earlier.
Searching for a way to recreate her life leads her to defy her guardian. As a result, she finds herself at odds with her family, her community including the church, and the law. In attempting to provide for herself she comes into conflict with her role and place in society. Yet, she must establish a new life for herself - one that honors her as an individual and as a woman.
What is most compelling about the tale, is how Lyddie handles the new experiences she faces. Her growth, courage, and wit make this an entertaining and enlightening story.
This satisfied my need for a now-and-then historical fiction read. The time is the 1760's, the place is Cape Cod and the era is Whaling. Lyddie is widowed as a result of a sea accident. She finds herself suddenly under the legal control of her mean and bullying son-in-law. Lyddie is feisty and is a 200 year old fore-runner of Betty Friedan as she tries to maintain her independence from his "rule." Legally she is entitled to live in one third of the home she created and shared with her now deceased husband. But only one third. With her son-in-law controlling the remaining two thirds, she had every reason to fight for a woman's rights. I could related to her sentiments of desperately needing a place to call her own where she can live independently, albeit in near poverty. She rises from the ashes and in doing so is a like-able character. Two or three times I laughed out loud at something sarcastic or funny she said. I wish there had been more of those moments because they were so rich with humor.
In trying to explain this book to a co-worker yesterday, I realized I'll never do justice to the story-line. It sounded so boring, coming out of my mouth, BUT it's not. Between the great writing, solid plot, a couple of twists and a little suspense (which I did not see coming), this book really kept me up all night trying to finish.
I have to admit, I could have done without the slight suspense presented . . . I would rather have had a logical explanation come out about why it just wouldn't work. But all in all a great book.
I loved reading this story of a determined, fiesty widow trying to retain control of her home after the death of her husband. The novel is set in 1760 when women had no right to own property so when Lyddie's fisherman husband drowns she is thrown of the mercies of her controlling son-in-law. His main concern is to make money from her property and drive her out of her home. Both widow and son-in-law are ingenious in the relentlessness. A pleasure to read.