In his reflection on the Rule of Benedict (RB), Kardong argues that the parts of the Rule that most belong to Benedict are those to toward the end. Benedict is clearly indebted to the Rule of the Master (RM), but also has his own ideas about monastic life. Kardong proposes that the earlier parts of the RB where Benedict depends more on the RM, should be interpreted in light of the parts of RB that more wholly belong to Benedict. As far as the interpretive principle goes, I think Kardong is right. His reflection assumes some basic knowledge of monasticism and the RB. Its usefulness to the reader may depend on one's own goals, as the problem of interpreting the RB is rather specific to Benedictine monastic communities. The book ends rather suddenly, a summative chapter would have been welcome.