Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Destruction of Memory: Architecture at War

Rate this book
The destruction of Nimrud and Palmyra, crumbled shells of mosques in Iraq, the fall of the World Trade Center towers on 9/11: when architectural totems such as these are destroyed by conflicts and the ravages of war, more than mere buildings are at stake. The Destruction of Memory, now with a new preface, argues that such destruction not only shatters a nation’s culture and morale but is a deliberate act of eradicating a culture’s memory and, ultimately, its existence. A film of the same name based on the book will be released in late 2015.

252 pages, Kindle Edition

First published March 25, 2005

20 people are currently reading
391 people want to read

About the author

Robert Bevan

2 books2 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
47 (37%)
4 stars
56 (45%)
3 stars
16 (12%)
2 stars
5 (4%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews
Profile Image for Mike Clinton.
172 reviews
August 9, 2018
Bevan establishes a strong case that "the myriad ways in which the world's built cultures have been destroyed by violent acts" (262) serve as both prelude (e.g., the burning of synagogues as part of the Kristallnacht pogrom) and accompaniment (e.g., the felling of the Mostar Bridge during the 1990s Balkans conflict) to genocide and ethnic cleansing, what he refers to as "cultural cleansing." He analyzes those ways in the ensuing chapters, provoking rich meditation about the constitutive elements of historical consciousness, the tension between memory and forgetting, the debate over preservation and reconstruction from traditionalist and critical perspectives, and other related considerations. He does so partly because these matters are important in their own right but partly, too, as a plea to carry out the commitments made in such international agreements as the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict through international criminal prosecution. His assertive commentary throughout the book reflects his passionate engagement with these issues, effectively conveyed to the reader in a way that, along with its clarity of style, make it a compelling read.
Profile Image for Maria Altabba.
26 reviews2 followers
October 5, 2025
This is not an easy read — and it’s not meant to be. Bevan collects an archive of cases where architecture is not just collateral damage but an active weapon: from Sarajevo to Belfast, Cyprus to Palestine, Warsaw to Aleppo. What I found both powerful and difficult is how he mixes testimony, history, and his own strong opinions. Sometimes that made it heavy, sometimes repetitive, but the weight is necessary.

The book’s strongest moments are when he shows how architecture is inseparable from memory and identity. Destroying a mosque, a church, or even a house is never just a physical act — it’s an attempt to erase the narrative of a people. And equally, rebuilding is never neutral: it can either falsify and sanitize, or it can serve as an act of witness.

I did find, however, that Bevan at times mishandles his references. In one early section, he praises Muslims for reusing sacred sites instead of destroying them, unlike Christians who often demolished. This observation is broadly true, but he supported it by citing a line he described as a Hadith. After digging, I could only trace it back to a mythological poem, not an authenticated Hadith. And Hadith, in Islamic tradition, are among the most rigorously verified sources we have, with chains of transmission and strict records. To conflate a myth with a Hadith shows a lack of awareness of its weight. His point—that Muslims often reused rather than destroyed—is valid, but it should have been grounded in reliable historical evidence, not a misattributed text.

That said, I give him credit for striving to seek truth and to show the moral stakes of architecture.

What stayed with me most:
• His analysis of absence — how sometimes ruins and scars are more honest than reconstructions.
• His warnings against turning trauma sites into commodified memorials.
• His reminder that truth must be recorded first, before heritage can be curated.

For me, this book was not just history, but a mirror to Syria’s future. How we rebuild will decide whether we remember truthfully, or repeat the cycle of erasure.

Not an easy book, not always elegant, and not flawless — but essential.

This book also inspired me to put my own thoughts on paper about Syria’s rebuilding. You can read my article, Syria’s Architecture of Rebuilding: Between Truth and Mercy, here:

https://medium.com/@mariaaltabba/syri...
Profile Image for Steven Batty.
121 reviews1 follower
April 18, 2020
A must read dealing with how to dehumanize people during war.
Profile Image for Ruby.
84 reviews2 followers
March 28, 2016
Surprisingly more interesting and easy to read than I was expecting. Especially the first 2 chapters ('cultural cleansing' and 'terror'). Lots of stuff to think about. Would love to read more about the different topics here.
Profile Image for Elizabeth.
113 reviews5 followers
December 11, 2007
In this book, Bevan looks at the destruction of historical architecture during times of armed conflict, especially at the deliberate destruction of architecture as it relates to culture.
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.