***THIS REVIEW CONTAINS SPOILERS***
Occasionally I lapse into profanity. If this offends you please do not read any further. This is a long review, so please avoid it if you dislike these, but I'm attempting to convey why I'm going against the grain here and rating what I suppose is an objectively important book so low.
Well, that was a slog.
I love historical fiction and I'm not shy of reading through books that could serve double duty as doorstops. I also grew up with Kurosawa's samurai epics and really enjoyed more modern entries into the same genre, like 13 Assassins. On paper, Musashi ticked all the boxes for me: a historical action novel about one of history's greatest swordsmen, set in feudal Japan, epic in scope and length, and written by a Japanese author who could hardly be accused of orientalist sensationalism? Sign me up!
In short, I was excited to read this book.
That excitement lasted all of, oh, maybe 200 pages before I realised, with a sinking feeling, that this book really wasn't for me. As a point of principle, I don't DNF books, so I persevered. Having struggled through all 970 pages of my edition of Musashi, including absolutely headbutting my way through the last 300 pages or so, I can't help but feel that my time would have been better spent elsewhere.
Some context before I get into the detail of the review. Musashi was published between 1935 and 1939, the early Showa Period in Japanese history. The context is important - this was a time of extreme militancy in Japanese society, with aggressive expansionism a near-constant, and even a bloody attempt at a military coup. Japan was at war with China while Musashi was being published, and two years later they would launch their attack on Pearl Harbor.
Over a period of four years, Musashi was serialised in Japan's most important newspaper. This format is almost certainly the source of many of the problems which, in my opinion, bedevil this work. I have tried to break down my issues with the novel thematically below - be advised, spoilers are present from here on out. Do not read further if you want to explore Musashi on your own.
Style: Musashi suffers from what I consider to be a very janky translation and would almost certainly benefit from an update. The translator intersperses modern colloquialisms, such as "okay", throughout the dialogue. Questionable word use abounds. Sentence structure is often poorly thought out, and the dialogue itself reads like early subtitles for Japanese films, and I don't mean that as a compliment; one senses a lot more nuance exists in the original. That being said, maybe the Japanese just talk like that (or Yoshikawa wrote them that way) and it just sounds jarring to me as a European.
Structure: Musashi is simultaneously too short and too long. I have read elsewhere that the 1000-page epic that exists in English is actually an abridged version of what was serialised in Japan's Asashi Shinbun, and that makes sense because entire narrative and character arcs occasionally fast-forward by a matter of years. Characters we have spent hundreds of pages with simply up and disappear; sometimes they appear again, and sometimes they don't. At one point about 800 pages in, Musashi is taken prisoner. The last time we see him he is being dragged away by the authorities, bound. He reappears some 40 pages later, apparently very little the worse for wear, and when Iori, his disciple at the time, asks him what happened he basically shrugs and says "don't worry about it, I'll tell you some other time." THIS IS THEN NEVER ADDRESSED AGAIN. What the Hell?
At the same time, entire Books (the novel is split into portions which loosely mirror Musashi's own philosophical text, The Book of Five Rings) are basically identical retreads of the previous ones, and serve to provide no narrative impetus, running along much the same lines: "Musashi is on the road, being harassed by his longtime persecutors who provide flank interference. He gets into some sort of argument, usually caused by a misunderstanding, with the head of a powerful Samurai house or swordfighting school. He fights them, and wins." A ruthlessly competent editor could probably trim the entire thing to a lean 300-odd pages and I suspect the novel would be much more enjoyable for it.
Character Arcs & Characterisation: Firstly, there are simply too many. I get that some of these are real historical figures which Japanese audiences probably got a kick out of seeing crop up, but many serve no narrative purpose beyond being glorified cameos; they appear and disappear at will, sometimes for hundreds of pages, occasionally turning up with something along the lines of "'tis I, so-and-so! Remember how we shared half a page together six hundred pages ago?". With ten pages to go to the end, new characters were STILL being introduced. This is simply not necessary.
Main characters will spend hundreds of pages - virtually the entire novel, in some cases - displaying not one iota of character development, only to have colossal, world-altering epiphanies and literally turn their entire life around over the course of half a page. This is not infrequent, and happens to at least 3 key characters. At other times, for no logical reason, characters will behave in a manner completely at odds with what we've learned about them and what they've done so far, only to then revert to type - or not, as the case may be. Again, one suspects there's a lot of cut content. Some specific issues with characters and their arcs below:
- Musashi: It's never made clear WHY Musashi is as good of a swordsman as he is, at least not in any satisfactory manner. His "training montage" consists of him being confined with books for several years in his teens, emerging from his enforced sabbatical a master swordsman. Then again, he was also pretty formidable before, based on the fights we see him engage in during the first part of the novel. There's some references to Zen and the meditative aspects of swordmanship, the implication being that Musashi had the raw potential and simply studied himself into excellence, but come on - when did he actually PRACTICE? At one point, Musashi's will-he-won't-he love interest and his disciple are kidnapped in suspicious circumstances, and he spends all of, oh, maybe five pages looking for them before effectively saying "well, that's that I guess", and going on with his life. This abandonment is never adequately explained or discussed by those characters when they do turn up later (no thanks to him).
- Matahachi: Musashi's childhood friend, a complete doormat of a character who is an utterly shiftless layabout for approximately 900 of the 970 pages, and who goes EXTREMELY close to sexually abusing Otsu, Musashi's "love interest" (on which more anon), who basically floats through the novel being variously useless, obnoxious, violent towards the weak, traitorous, drunken, and overall just pathetic. Yet in half a page in the final act of the book he suddenly decides he's going to be a good dad upon discovering he has a child with Akemi, the daughter of the older woman he shacked up with at the start of the novel. All well and good, but this is treated as some kind of redemption arc when we've seen Matahachi completely renounce all his grand prospects about a dozen times before (he literally gives up on his journey to become a priest in order to look after Akemi and his child) so one would be forgiven for suspecting he'll dump Akemi and become a pirate or some such after the novel's close.
- Sasaki Kojiro/Ganryu: The villain of the piece and after Musashi the only character I thought was worth spending any time with. Despite being an out-and-out self-aggrandising scumbag for the majority of the novel, he's apparently canonised when Musashi, at last, cracks his skull open on the last page-but-one (despite it being extremely obvious from page 50 or so that they'd eventually fight to the death). Through Musashi's POV, we're meant to somehow simpathise with Kojiro, a character who a few hundred pages before RAPED Akemi and spent a lot of the book terrorising her to get her back after she escaped. It might, theoretically, be possible to craft a redemption arc for a character who engaged in such a reprehensible act - maybe (if you were an exceptionally talented author). Personally, I think it places him beyond the pale, but in the final page, Yoshikawa basically tries to make us feel sorry for the prick. I say good riddance.
Jotaro/Iori: Musashi has two disciples in the novel, first Jotaro and then Iori. Both are children. He picks up Jotaro when he's quite young himself. I suppose the implication is that Musashi maturing over the course of the novel means he's actually a better teacher and therefore Iori is a better human than Jotaro but this is never really developed or even implied - one simply deduces it from the fact that Jotaro is an absolute shitstain while Iori is at least tolerable. Neither is particularly enjoyable to spend time with, but Jotaro is truly awful. At one point he beats a dog (belonging to a nobleman) to death because he provoked it and the dog lashed out. When the nobleman's retainers are about to punish him, Musashi prevents them from doing so, for no particularly good reason. He later savagely beats a servant who's just trying to do his job. Beyond physically growing up, he never displays any character development - he's basically the same obnoxious little asshole at the end of the book as he is at the start. Iori is a little better, if only because he's less bloodthirsty towards defenceless animals and social inferiors. Iori also actually gets TRAINED by Musashi, whereas Jotaro never receives a single physical lesson in swordsmanship and learned his trade, one presumes, by osmosis.
Otsu: I hate the word "simp" but if ever a character deserved to be tarred with this brush it's Otsu. She feverishly pines after Musashi (to the point of almost dying of it) for the entire length of the novel, despite him outright rejecting her, and abandoning her to some less-than-ideal fates, a number of times throughout the book. I mentioned before how Musashi let her get kidnapped (by Matahachi) and then gave up on looking for her after about an hour. Does she ever bring this egregious betrayal up? Does she bollocks. They eventually get "married" prior to Musashi's duel with Kojiro on page 965/970 or thereabouts, presumably because Musashi was so exhausted with her, but not as exhausted as I was. A complete mollusc of a character. Grow a spine, lady! Have you considered reading "He's Just Not That Into You"? The bloke clearly just wants to go around being a lone Ronin, just let him get on with his life and find some meaning in yours. The "happy resolution" is effectively an acknowledgement that Otsu has wasted a couple decades of her life waiting for Musashi to make up his bloody mind.
Osugi: Matahachi's mother and the only female character with anything resembling some sort of agency - but that agency is entirely wasted by having her be some sort of (I assume) semi-comedic antagonist to Musashi. I say semi-comedic because the idea of the best swordsman in the world being repeatedly threatened by a little old woman with a shortsword in a one-on-one duel seems farcical, yet it's ostensibly played straight - maybe I just don't get Japanese humour. Throughout the entire novel, she goes out of her way to variously attempt to murder (either herself or through proxies) incarcerate, slander, discredit and otherwise wreak serious harm upon Musashi, Otsu and any number of the main cast, purely because of a misunderstanding (she blames Musashi for her son's downfall) that could have been cleared up in about thirty minutes if they'd all just sat down and talked. I get that she's meant to be a cautionary tale about the perils of hate for hate's sake, but come on. The woman is also portrayed as old and ailing at the start of the novel yet she's somehow on the hunt for Musashi for DECADES and is still alive and kicking at the end. Like many other characters, she also does a complete 180 (with the aid of a religious/spiritual revelation) about 960 pages in, and becomes friendly and supportive of Musashi and Otsu despite years of hate and villainy. They also forgive her without question, despite the various attempts on their lives and untold suffering she's caused them.
Narrative Choices & Themes: Coincidence, possibly religious or spiritual in nature (all is pre-ordained, etc) carries way too much weight in the novel. Edo Period Japan had a population of between 20 and 30 million, yet the main cast of characters, often at a distance of years, keep running into each other by complete chance. It makes cities like Edo and Osaka, which in reality were teeming with millions of people, seem like small villages.
While the duels are probably the best part of the novel - one senses fights between men effectively armed with 3-foot razors and wearing no armour would have ended very quickly and messily within one or two fast cuts, with any wound being basically disabling, and this is well-conveyed - some things are treated in a manner so unrealistic they just pull you out of the narrative. The treatment of firearms is especially egregious; several times in the novel, Musashi and (if I remember right) Kojiro outright DODGE musket bullets. This is simply not how firearms, even early ones, work. It's not physically possible. Maybe it's poorly conveyed in translation.
Either Yoshikawa didn't know how to write children, or the child population of Edo (or early Showa) Japan was made up entirely of screeching, violent ferals. I'm not an advocate of corporal punishment in child-raising, but the portrayal of pretty much every kid in this book, especially Jotaro and early Iori, made my hands itch. Yet characters in general who'll happily murder an adult over some perceived slight are weirdly overindulgent with these mini-goblins, who spend most of their time insulting adults or causing physical harm via thrown blunt objects.
The characterisation of women is, I think, problematic. I get that the novel is a product of its time, and that it's extremely likely that in Edo Japan women were reduced to the role of glorified room decor, but in this case I'm disinclined to excuse it. Every female character in this novel is either a prostitute (with varying degrees of consent involved in that career choice) a simp, or an embittered old crone.
Anyone who isn't from the Samurai/aristocratic or (with some exceptions) successful mercantile classes is written as either a bigot, a harmless simpleton, or a vicious moron. Whenever anyone displays any form of artistic or philosophical bent, it's always remarked upon by another character with something along the lines of "ah but of course, he has Samurai blood".
I understand that the novel is an important cornerstone in Japanese literature. I also find it interesting that none of its apologists in the foreword and introduction think it worth mentioning how violent and imperialistic the Japanese zeitgeist was when it was receiving such resounding success as a newspaper serial.
Some grades and a summary, then. Forgive me for rambling as long as I have.
Structure: 1/5. Too much bloat, yet somehow entire crucial story and character beats are missed completely. From around page 600 or so - after the defeat of the Yoshioka school - until around page 900 in the build-up to the duel on Ganryu Island, it loses focus completely.
Character arcs & Characterisation: 2/5 Musashi (and to a lesser extent Kojiro) is the only character I had any interest in spending any time with, yet somehow it felt like we did so for only around half of the novel. Reading chapters from the POV of characters which were simultaneously boring AND utterly unlikeable (Matahachi, Jotaro, Otsu, Osugi) was a chore. Virtually all significant character developments either happened off-page, were treated as a fait accompli, or were wrapped up in half a page or so in the final chapter.
Narrative Choices & Themes: 1/5 A heavy reliance on coincidence and characters consistently picking the worst possible choice, coupled with the virtual recycling of entire books, made getting through this a chore. Add a dollop of unrealistic action and a healthy dose of misogyny and classism and it doesn't make for a very compelling recipe.
Cultural importance: 4/5. This is why I think reading Musashi wasn't entirely a wasted effort. What it DOES provide, in a fascinating way, is an insight into how a popular Japanese author in the 1930s viewed a famous historical figure from the 1600s and thus gives us a window into the collective Japanese psyche at the time. This was a time when the concept of Bushido was effectively being re-invented from scratch from the loose collection of ideas it was in feudal Japan to how it exists in the collective imagination today. In much the same way as Mussolini's Fascist regime remodernised and rewrote Imperial Rome to serve as the bedrock for their own ideals, Imperial Japan did the same during the Meiji Restoration and the Taisho and early Showa periods. As a pastiche of what 1930s Japanese enjoyed and how they thought of their ancestors (and social "superiors" and "inferiors", including women and the working classes) it's very interesting and can give some insight into the psychology that shaped the events to come.
I just wish it weren't so damn long.