Wannsee
Jeremy Noakes, Lesley Sharpe, Peter Longerich
I argue that the Holocaust was not set in motion by a single decision from the centre. It must instead be seen in the context of the National Socialists’ anti-Jewish policies, which, while focused on the long term, were repeatedly subject to changes. The Holocaust was the result of a decision-making process in which Hitler, the key source of authority in the ‘Third Reich’, acting in close co-operation with other parts of the power structure, gradually developed what had previously been only a vague intention to destroy the Jews into a concrete programme to murder them.
*****
The original plan had been to deport the European Jews to the newly occupied eastern territories after the rapid defeat of the Soviet Union, but the military situation made this a distant prospect. At the same time, the shootings of Jewish civilians in the Soviet Union, and in Serbia too, had reached such proportions that those responsible saw an opportunity to accomplish the ‘final solution to the Jewish question’ in these territories even before the end of the war. In addition, the deportations that had begun in the autumn from the German Reich to the ghettos of eastern Europe created new problems, and some of those in authority on the spot had begun to propose mass murder as a solution. There was therefore a distinct need to clarify how ‘Jewish policy’ should be taken forward.
*****
‘We are now seeing the fulfilment of this prophecy. The Jews are suffering a fate that, though harsh, is amply deserved. Pity or regret are completely out of place’. ‘World Jewry’, Goebbels claims, ‘is now undergoing a gradual process of annihilation’.
*****
we can begin to discern two increasingly competing lines being taken in ‘Jewish policy’ in these decisive months. On the one hand, Heydrich was still pursuing a solution through massive deportation on the basis of a fully worked-out overall plan, and, on the other, Himmler was aiming to boost by all available means the murder process that had been set in motion in particular key areas by the deportations, without waiting for an overall plan.
*****
Thus the Wannsee Conference set in motion a process of redefining the when, how, and where of the ‘final solution’.
*****
What is striking is that in a period of only a week between the end of April and the beginning of May Himmler and Heydrich met a total of seven times in three different locations (Berlin, Munich, and Prague). This exceptionally intensive series of meetings was book-ended by two lengthy meetings Himmler had with Hitler on 23 April and 3 May 1942. We do not know what was discussed at these meetings, but the fact that immediately afterwards ‘Jewish policy’ escalated in an overwhelmingly uniform manner in very diverse settings suggests that in late April/early May Hitler, Himmler, and Heydrich reached agreement on a Europe-wide ‘final solution’.