What do you think?
Rate this book
Politics of Place #2
Worth Dying For: The Power and Politics of Flags
When you see your nation's flag fluttering in the breeze, what do you feel?
For thousands of years flags have represented our hopes and dreams. We wave them. Burn them. March under their colours. And still, in the 21st century, we die for them. Flags fly at the UN, on the Arab street, from front porches in Texas. They represent the politics of high power as well as the politics of the mob.
From the renewed sense of nationalism in China, to troubled identities in Europe and the USA, to the terrifying rise of Islamic State, the world is a confusing place right now and we need to understand the histories, the power and the politics od the symbols that people are rallying round; the symbols that unite us - and divide us.
For thousands of years flags have represented our hopes and dreams. We wave them. Burn them. March under their colours. And still, in the 21st century, we die for them. Flags fly at the UN, on the Arab street, from front porches in Texas. They represent the politics of high power as well as the politics of the mob.
From the renewed sense of nationalism in China, to troubled identities in Europe and the USA, to the terrifying rise of Islamic State, the world is a confusing place right now and we need to understand the histories, the power and the politics od the symbols that people are rallying round; the symbols that unite us - and divide us.
297 pages, Paperback
First published September 22, 2016
761 people are currently reading
9035 people want to read
About the author
Tim Marshall
21 books2,597 followersLibrarian Note: There is more than one author in the Goodreads database with this name.
Tim Marshall was Diplomatic Editor and foreign correspondent for Sky News. After thirty years' experience in news reporting and presenting, he left full time news journalism to concentrate on writing and analysis.
Originally from Leeds, Tim arrived at broadcasting from the road less traveled. Not a media studies or journalism graduate, in fact not a graduate at all, after a wholly unsuccessful career as a painter and decorator he worked his way through newsroom nightshifts, and unpaid stints as a researcher and runner before eventually securing himself a foothold on the first rung of the broadcasting career ladder.
After three years as IRN's Paris correspondent and extensive work for BBC radio and TV, Tim joined Sky News. Reporting from Europe, the USA and Asia, Tim became Middle East Correspondent based in Jerusalem.
Tim also reported in the field from Bosnia, Croatia and Serbia during the Balkan wars of the 1990s. He spent the majority of the 1999 Kosovo crisis in Belgrade, where he was one of the few western journalists who stayed on to report from one of the main targets of NATO bombing raids. Tim was in Kosovo to greet the NATO troops on the day they advanced into Pristina. In recent years he covered the conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and Syria.
He has written for many of the national newspapers including the Times, the Guardian, the Daily Telegraph, and the Sunday Times.
Bio photo credit © Jolly Thompson.
Tim Marshall was Diplomatic Editor and foreign correspondent for Sky News. After thirty years' experience in news reporting and presenting, he left full time news journalism to concentrate on writing and analysis.
Originally from Leeds, Tim arrived at broadcasting from the road less traveled. Not a media studies or journalism graduate, in fact not a graduate at all, after a wholly unsuccessful career as a painter and decorator he worked his way through newsroom nightshifts, and unpaid stints as a researcher and runner before eventually securing himself a foothold on the first rung of the broadcasting career ladder.
After three years as IRN's Paris correspondent and extensive work for BBC radio and TV, Tim joined Sky News. Reporting from Europe, the USA and Asia, Tim became Middle East Correspondent based in Jerusalem.
Tim also reported in the field from Bosnia, Croatia and Serbia during the Balkan wars of the 1990s. He spent the majority of the 1999 Kosovo crisis in Belgrade, where he was one of the few western journalists who stayed on to report from one of the main targets of NATO bombing raids. Tim was in Kosovo to greet the NATO troops on the day they advanced into Pristina. In recent years he covered the conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and Syria.
He has written for many of the national newspapers including the Times, the Guardian, the Daily Telegraph, and the Sunday Times.
Bio photo credit © Jolly Thompson.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 494 reviews
October 14, 2016
My first impressions of this book were highly positive. Instantly, I imagined giving this book a rating of five stars. What drew me in the beginning was the chapter names; I really liked the way that the book was structured. The first few chapters were stimulating, concise, and highly educational; I certainly learned a great deal. Then, I reached the chapter on Arabian flags, and I spotted a few sloppy errors by the author that brought my initial impression down to four stars. And including Turkey and Iran in a chapter called 'Colours of Arabia'? At least change it to 'Colours of the Middle East'. The sloppy factual errors, while irritating and slightly orientalist, could still be forgiven. After all, the book was still highly engaging and informative.
Then, I reached the 'flags of fear' chapter. Let's put aside the fact that the author chose to focus solely on flags purporting to represent Islam. Marshall meekly tried to defend this in the beginning by saying that, by focusing on Islam he was not singling it out, but he was making it more relevant to the reader and more relatable in terms of current affairs. So talking about Islam in an us-versus-them-way makes for a capturing read. Why couldn't he have included the Nazi and Communist flags here? It would have fit better and made for a more balanced chapter. But moving on.
This chapter in particular is filled with so much orientalist writing that really put the book in perspective for me. The first thing he does is make ISIS sound like the biggest evil since the medieval times (hello Nazis and the KKK?) in a highly sensationalised opening paragraph.
Later, he quotes a hadith that ISIS use for propaganda regarding following the black banners as behind them is a caliph. Never mind that ISIS may actually misquote this hadith and use it to try and lure followers; warping the truth is what they do best. But the author had an obligation at least to contextualise anything that he was quoting. In this particular instance, Muslims believe that the hadith refers to the coming of the mahdi (messiah) towards the end of time, something completely unrelated to the ISIS phenomenon. And the second hadith he quotes, regarding army under black flags coming from the east, actually comes from the same narration and refers to a time before the coming of the mahdi where Muslims will be killed by an army from the East bearing black banners. This actually works as a proof against ISIS, but this is not conveyed in Marshall's inclusion of it in the text. And by the way - yes, Muslims 'really do believe' in narrations regarding the end of the world. Maybe not exactly as the author has written them in his book, but his tone was extremely patronising nonetheless. Writers of academic pieces of work also have an obligation to be neutral and not let polemics interfere with their writing.
All this made me realise that the author doesn't actually know much at all. He knows little bits of information about a lot of things and was able to make a book out of it. And there is a lot of danger in a little bit of knowledge. And then it got me thinking to the earlier chapters that I enjoyed so much; what if I enjoyed them because I actually know little about their history? What if he was also quoting some contested bits of information, or omitting crucial bits of context from some of his other explanations? At least with the chapters on Arabia and flags of fear, I was able to recognise some of the sloppy mistakes because of some background knowledge on them.
All this aside, it is a highly accessible book. And I did still learn a lot. So I'm not sorry that I read it, but I am disappointed. But it isn't academic; it's a pseudo-intellectual book. While admittedly, academic books are usually dry, this book is contrastingly very easy to pick up and read. This has its positives of course, but can also be dangerous if this is what the lay person ends up reading and takes for gospel.
Then, I reached the 'flags of fear' chapter. Let's put aside the fact that the author chose to focus solely on flags purporting to represent Islam. Marshall meekly tried to defend this in the beginning by saying that, by focusing on Islam he was not singling it out, but he was making it more relevant to the reader and more relatable in terms of current affairs. So talking about Islam in an us-versus-them-way makes for a capturing read. Why couldn't he have included the Nazi and Communist flags here? It would have fit better and made for a more balanced chapter. But moving on.
This chapter in particular is filled with so much orientalist writing that really put the book in perspective for me. The first thing he does is make ISIS sound like the biggest evil since the medieval times (hello Nazis and the KKK?) in a highly sensationalised opening paragraph.
Later, he quotes a hadith that ISIS use for propaganda regarding following the black banners as behind them is a caliph. Never mind that ISIS may actually misquote this hadith and use it to try and lure followers; warping the truth is what they do best. But the author had an obligation at least to contextualise anything that he was quoting. In this particular instance, Muslims believe that the hadith refers to the coming of the mahdi (messiah) towards the end of time, something completely unrelated to the ISIS phenomenon. And the second hadith he quotes, regarding army under black flags coming from the east, actually comes from the same narration and refers to a time before the coming of the mahdi where Muslims will be killed by an army from the East bearing black banners. This actually works as a proof against ISIS, but this is not conveyed in Marshall's inclusion of it in the text. And by the way - yes, Muslims 'really do believe' in narrations regarding the end of the world. Maybe not exactly as the author has written them in his book, but his tone was extremely patronising nonetheless. Writers of academic pieces of work also have an obligation to be neutral and not let polemics interfere with their writing.
All this made me realise that the author doesn't actually know much at all. He knows little bits of information about a lot of things and was able to make a book out of it. And there is a lot of danger in a little bit of knowledge. And then it got me thinking to the earlier chapters that I enjoyed so much; what if I enjoyed them because I actually know little about their history? What if he was also quoting some contested bits of information, or omitting crucial bits of context from some of his other explanations? At least with the chapters on Arabia and flags of fear, I was able to recognise some of the sloppy mistakes because of some background knowledge on them.
All this aside, it is a highly accessible book. And I did still learn a lot. So I'm not sorry that I read it, but I am disappointed. But it isn't academic; it's a pseudo-intellectual book. While admittedly, academic books are usually dry, this book is contrastingly very easy to pick up and read. This has its positives of course, but can also be dangerous if this is what the lay person ends up reading and takes for gospel.
November 17, 2017
This book reads as though it was written in the middle of the night by a smug and overconfident high school student on a deadline, simultaneously cherry-picking factoids from Wikipedia and the CIA World Factbook while augmenting the final word count with insipid opinions and weak humor. I give it one star only because zero is not an option.
January 18, 2021
Below average read. A disappointing offering from the author, prisoners of geography was a hugely captivating read, yet Tim Marshal's latest left me feeling underwhelmed.
There were some genuinely interesting parts to the book, but there was also a great deal of unnecessary wish wash with generous helpings of under-researched bias.
A book for the sake of sales only.
There were some genuinely interesting parts to the book, but there was also a great deal of unnecessary wish wash with generous helpings of under-researched bias.
A book for the sake of sales only.
June 28, 2017
This is exactly the sort of nonfiction I love. Smart, educational without being pedantic, exceptionally well written, humorous and informative. Marshall is no stranger to politics and this book definitely showcases his erudite knowledge, this is geopolitics mixed in with historical data and even anthropology and sociology. Flags are crucially important not only as the emblems of nations, but also political and/or social parties, organizations, etc. They are wildly recognizable and imbued with a power far beyond their representational qualities alone. They also have fascinating backstories and wildly varied rules and regulations about their use. This book covers the entire globe, continent by continent, highlighting all of the major and some of the minor players, with the last chapter dedicated to the category of other...from rainbow flags to NATO. It's a journey around the world well worth taking with the Marshall as a travel guide. FYI...vexillology is a study of flags. So there, you just learned something new. Now read this book and learn a lot more, all presented in an engaging and entertaining manner all nonfiction should aspire to. Terrific book. Enthusiastically recommended. Thanks Netgalley.
January 24, 2018
This is what it says on the cover: a book about flags. And a very good one at that. For someone with an insatiable curiosity like me, books such as this one are pure gems: they give me very useful information packaged in a highly appealing way. Marshall is a very good writer, and he can be incredibly funny - laugh out loud type of funny - even in a book about the history of flags. Do pick it up if you have the time, and definitely do pick it up if you're just interested in the subject - it's a very good place to start.
July 17, 2021
A book filled with intelligent trivia that's tainted by the author's commentary. Even for a geo-politics newbie like me, Marshall's biases were impossible to ignore. Perhaps if you avoid the 'Flags of Terror' chapter and the author's relentless obeisance to the United States, the book would make for a spectacular read. It's a treasure trove of the histories of nation's flags written in a highly capable journalist's immaculate way of stitching the world together. Unfortunately, those biases do exist, and the Flags of Terror chapter is a central part of the book, both of which fell uncomfortably on my boundaries of bearability.
I've had my fair share of obsession with flags of the world, and questions like "Why are the Mexican and Italian flags so similar" have certainly entertained me. So this book was fantastic - at the least, it informed me on which questions were worth pondering more on and which of them were truly inconsequential (The Mexican-Italian coincidence, for instance.) The optimistic chapter on Central and South American flags (Flags of Freedom) and the chapter that quickly and efficiently analyzed the African flags were some of the high points of the read.
If the narration hadn't so obviously been affected by Marshall's political views, this book would have been an instant recommendation from me. As it stands, I'll add the disclaimer and assert that it's still worth a read. However, I'd recommend one to read Prisoners of Geography first, Marshall's more recent release which, while still being opinionated, is more reasonably so.
I've had my fair share of obsession with flags of the world, and questions like "Why are the Mexican and Italian flags so similar" have certainly entertained me. So this book was fantastic - at the least, it informed me on which questions were worth pondering more on and which of them were truly inconsequential (The Mexican-Italian coincidence, for instance.) The optimistic chapter on Central and South American flags (Flags of Freedom) and the chapter that quickly and efficiently analyzed the African flags were some of the high points of the read.
If the narration hadn't so obviously been affected by Marshall's political views, this book would have been an instant recommendation from me. As it stands, I'll add the disclaimer and assert that it's still worth a read. However, I'd recommend one to read Prisoners of Geography first, Marshall's more recent release which, while still being opinionated, is more reasonably so.
August 15, 2017
Tim Marshall's bias is evident throughout this whole book that barely talks about flags, spending most of its time presenting the author's old man fallacious rants. The book is full of inconsistencies, inaccuracies, and opinions presented as facts. I do not recommend this book to anyone, ever.
September 14, 2017
The only positive for this book is if one literally judges it by the cover. The dust jacket is a brilliant piece of aesthetic. Now put the book down and walk away. The only enjoyment a reader can possibly get has been had.
What can be learned about flags from the point of opening the cover is a simple listing of the meanings of colors, research that could easily be completed in an hour on wikipedia.
This reader foolishly persisted and was treated to numerous facile opinions on if a flag looked nice and if the author liked a country. Liked a country? Yes. As in does he enjoy the local food or is a fan of the national soccer team.
Two sections of the book treat us to an Islamophobia-lite. For it is not enough to have "Colors of Arabia" but to have an entire section on flags of armed non-state organizations boiled down to armed non-state actors with Islam informing their ideology. The author has a ridiculous explanation as to why this approach is OK.
The author has more pages devoted to the evils of Communism than to any one subject (14 total). He compares Communism to Nazis and ISIS (neglecting to mention 18 million Soviet citizens who died fighting Nazis in WW2 or that the most important resistance to ISIS grows out of the Kurdish PKK).
14 pages of rants about the evils of Communism from a Yankeephile Brit.
This is altogether too much like being back in 10th grade history class, complete with the srtoked-out former basketball couch stumbling into the classroom, drooling from one side of his mouth, pants zipper open, still drunk from last nights last call.
What can be learned about flags from the point of opening the cover is a simple listing of the meanings of colors, research that could easily be completed in an hour on wikipedia.
This reader foolishly persisted and was treated to numerous facile opinions on if a flag looked nice and if the author liked a country. Liked a country? Yes. As in does he enjoy the local food or is a fan of the national soccer team.
Two sections of the book treat us to an Islamophobia-lite. For it is not enough to have "Colors of Arabia" but to have an entire section on flags of armed non-state organizations boiled down to armed non-state actors with Islam informing their ideology. The author has a ridiculous explanation as to why this approach is OK.
The author has more pages devoted to the evils of Communism than to any one subject (14 total). He compares Communism to Nazis and ISIS (neglecting to mention 18 million Soviet citizens who died fighting Nazis in WW2 or that the most important resistance to ISIS grows out of the Kurdish PKK).
14 pages of rants about the evils of Communism from a Yankeephile Brit.
This is altogether too much like being back in 10th grade history class, complete with the srtoked-out former basketball couch stumbling into the classroom, drooling from one side of his mouth, pants zipper open, still drunk from last nights last call.
April 22, 2018
The book discusses an interesting topic and you learn a fair bit about the history and meaning of flags of countries, organisations, and institutions. I picked up this book having heard raving reviews about Prisoners of Geography, which I am yet to read.
However, what irked me were areas where Tim discusses, often unrequired for the context of the book, the political and cultural positioning of countries. These areas appear to be based more on Tim's opinions rather than facts, contain inconsistencies and stereotypes, and make the book fall short of a good read.
For example, Tim focuses on militant Islamic organisations in the chapter 'Flags of Fear'. The Nazi swastika or the KKK flag would've equally suited this chapter, but Tim only discusses them in the passing in other sections. In another instance, Tim confuses religious conservatism and fundamentalism by pointing out that a Muslim man "having a beard but shaving the top lip is a sure sigh that he is of a fundamentalist bent."
Overall, The Power and Politics of Flags had a very western bias in writing. A more neutral approach would have indeed made the book more appealing.
However, what irked me were areas where Tim discusses, often unrequired for the context of the book, the political and cultural positioning of countries. These areas appear to be based more on Tim's opinions rather than facts, contain inconsistencies and stereotypes, and make the book fall short of a good read.
For example, Tim focuses on militant Islamic organisations in the chapter 'Flags of Fear'. The Nazi swastika or the KKK flag would've equally suited this chapter, but Tim only discusses them in the passing in other sections. In another instance, Tim confuses religious conservatism and fundamentalism by pointing out that a Muslim man "having a beard but shaving the top lip is a sure sigh that he is of a fundamentalist bent."
Overall, The Power and Politics of Flags had a very western bias in writing. A more neutral approach would have indeed made the book more appealing.
April 6, 2022
How does a piece of fabric inspire, frighten, unite, and divide entire populations?
Tim Marshall’s book explores not only the historical contexts in which flags develop, but also how they gain the power to represent a nation’s cultural identity. Covering a range of (non-)state flags from around the world, the author touches upon, among others, the intricate symbolism of the Iranian flag, why the Union Jack doesn’t feature a dragon, and how to conduct a proper burial ceremony for the Stars & Stripes.
This is a worthy read for anyone interested in politics & history, and a perfect one for vexillology enthusiasts.
Tim Marshall’s book explores not only the historical contexts in which flags develop, but also how they gain the power to represent a nation’s cultural identity. Covering a range of (non-)state flags from around the world, the author touches upon, among others, the intricate symbolism of the Iranian flag, why the Union Jack doesn’t feature a dragon, and how to conduct a proper burial ceremony for the Stars & Stripes.
This is a worthy read for anyone interested in politics & history, and a perfect one for vexillology enthusiasts.
May 12, 2018
Entertaining book, a little bit too much centered around the US and Europe but informative nonetheless. If you want a brief historical background about mot countries and why they chose the flags they did this is the book for you. Very brief mention about South American countries, African and Asian countries are underrepresented as well. the information was factual to the best of my knowledge .
January 31, 2022
O chvíľu je olympiáda, majstrovstvá v hokeji, potom nejaký ďalší šport a možno nejaká návšteva pápeža... proste udalosti, na ktorých vlajka nemôže chýbať. Kde inde ju tak veľmi vnímate? Ak by ste boli američan, asi by to vnímali inak. Nemusela by to byť občasná hrdosť hej-národniara, ale každodenná pýcha a dôvod pre čo žiť. Ale odkiaľkovek človek je, ten kus farebnej látky má pre každého význam, pre ktorý je často ochotný položiť život. Na jednej strane vtipné, na druhej desivé. A pritom významu farieb a symbolov na tej látke rozumie málokto, esencii ale každý. A tak hoci by mala vlajka spájať, vo výsledku iba viac rozdeľuje. "A v-v-v-vo tom to celé je". Tim Marshall je must read, ak sa chcete troška viac orientovať v dnešnom svete.
June 30, 2024
Another amazing book from Tim Marshall, focused on the history point of the countries (but not specifically) flags. An interesting perspective and a lot to learn. Not the strongest book of Tim, but that's probably because he has put such high standards with the rest of his books.
February 14, 2024
Fascinating read on how flags around the world look like they do. It's a great study on how culture, religion, and history mould a nation in their symbolism and pride.
I learned quite a lot, although it did remind me of those exams in high school a bit. But still, a very good read I'd recommend to anyone who would like to understand why we are where we are now in global politics.
I learned quite a lot, although it did remind me of those exams in high school a bit. But still, a very good read I'd recommend to anyone who would like to understand why we are where we are now in global politics.
March 3, 2021
Thank you Emma for giving me this book, and as promised here’s the review!
I thought it was highly informative and incredibly interesting, especially for someone like me who hoovers up facts like a well... hoover and spits them back out to people who are either willing or unwilling. For example, I bet you didn’t know that Bolivia has a Llama on their flag or the name ‘Union Jack’ originated from the jackstaff of a ship; I didn’t even know a jackstaff was a thing. I could literally go on but then you need to read the book yourself to get these snazzy facts that I now have. Mwhaha...
Marshall’s style is incredibly easy to read and explains things in just the right detail so you’re not entirely in the deep end for any novices (like me) yet doesn’t get repetitive, so it certainly would be suitable for anyone interested in learning more about history and well flags.
However some times I did feel that these facts and countries were just randomly thrown together just because he had these facts in the back of his brain and wanted to put them in a book. This wasn’t constant but there were certain points I was thinking ‘Huh?!?’. In particular Marshall mentioned something about beards showing tradition which was incredibly randomly placed and added absolutely nothing to the background of the flag or the country (in my humble opinion anyway). There were also parts that seemed added just because, like at the end of the book the International Flag of Planet Earth had only a couple of small paragraphs randomly inserted within the UN part. It didn’t seem fully necessary, and was kind of confusing as it didn’t fit at all, although admittedly what was there was interesting.
This is me just being picky now but there were a couple of sentence mistakes I.e words that shouldn’t have been there or missing words as well which was a shame but it didn’t detract from the book at all though; just annoying.
There was also only one page in the middle with the flag photos and because I’m no expert on flags I had to constantly keep on flicking back to that middle page to see what he meant -I mean that is a minor bug bear but it was a bit of a hassle and meant that I cracked the spine a LOT (anyone who knows me know I have a weird issue with cracking spines)
So, overall I thought it was a pretty decent book and I have learnt a lot (and enjoyed reading it too) with lots of highly interesting facts and one of my all time favourite quotes now: “How can you govern a country with 246 different types of cheese?” -De Gaulle.
I thought it was highly informative and incredibly interesting, especially for someone like me who hoovers up facts like a well... hoover and spits them back out to people who are either willing or unwilling. For example, I bet you didn’t know that Bolivia has a Llama on their flag or the name ‘Union Jack’ originated from the jackstaff of a ship; I didn’t even know a jackstaff was a thing. I could literally go on but then you need to read the book yourself to get these snazzy facts that I now have. Mwhaha...
Marshall’s style is incredibly easy to read and explains things in just the right detail so you’re not entirely in the deep end for any novices (like me) yet doesn’t get repetitive, so it certainly would be suitable for anyone interested in learning more about history and well flags.
However some times I did feel that these facts and countries were just randomly thrown together just because he had these facts in the back of his brain and wanted to put them in a book. This wasn’t constant but there were certain points I was thinking ‘Huh?!?’. In particular Marshall mentioned something about beards showing tradition which was incredibly randomly placed and added absolutely nothing to the background of the flag or the country (in my humble opinion anyway). There were also parts that seemed added just because, like at the end of the book the International Flag of Planet Earth had only a couple of small paragraphs randomly inserted within the UN part. It didn’t seem fully necessary, and was kind of confusing as it didn’t fit at all, although admittedly what was there was interesting.
This is me just being picky now but there were a couple of sentence mistakes I.e words that shouldn’t have been there or missing words as well which was a shame but it didn’t detract from the book at all though; just annoying.
There was also only one page in the middle with the flag photos and because I’m no expert on flags I had to constantly keep on flicking back to that middle page to see what he meant -I mean that is a minor bug bear but it was a bit of a hassle and meant that I cracked the spine a LOT (anyone who knows me know I have a weird issue with cracking spines)
So, overall I thought it was a pretty decent book and I have learnt a lot (and enjoyed reading it too) with lots of highly interesting facts and one of my all time favourite quotes now: “How can you govern a country with 246 different types of cheese?” -De Gaulle.
January 29, 2019
This was a terrific book! The author takes the reader on a world and history tour to describe the flags of the world. Marshall goes further than current nation states and discusses the flags of non-state actors such as the Red Cross, Hezbollah, the United Nations and NATO. Each color and design on every flag has some type of meaning, either real or legend. Some flags have symbols of piece, others display swords, or an AK-47. Colors on flags can represent ethnic groups, religion, or red for blood combined with white for peace.
For anyone interested in world history, military history, or flags in general, I highly recommend this book.
For anyone interested in world history, military history, or flags in general, I highly recommend this book.
August 4, 2018
Proverbial goodtime nonfiction, with a nice ratio of new trivia to text, not too many editing missteps, and a refreshingly centrist, ahysterical approach to the world and recent history. Two easy hours. While such a short book can't cover every national flag, I would have appreciated at least a miniature color reproduction of all 193, as my Aspergersy year of flag-memorizing was 1987, and I know I'm out-of-date on any number. Oh well.
October 5, 2021
An enjoyable read, but one which was disappointing given the success of the first book in this series, ‘Prisoners of Geography’.
This was a meticulous and well-researched history of flags, and had this been what the book set out to achieve, it would have been an admirable effort. However, I expected to see more about the ‘power’ of flags - more about their influence and what they represent in the modern day.
Overall, a well-written but nonetheless disappointing read.
This was a meticulous and well-researched history of flags, and had this been what the book set out to achieve, it would have been an admirable effort. However, I expected to see more about the ‘power’ of flags - more about their influence and what they represent in the modern day.
Overall, a well-written but nonetheless disappointing read.
January 5, 2022
2.5
Incredibly unfocused, some really bland takes, very much a liberal™ text and it even begins a chapter with a Rowling quote.
I'd probably be upset if I had payed for this
Incredibly unfocused, some really bland takes, very much a liberal™ text and it even begins a chapter with a Rowling quote.
I'd probably be upset if I had payed for this
November 22, 2025
Pretty interesting, but a bit too chaotic for my liking
May 15, 2021
This book is exactly what it claims to be - the history of flags. The author goes over the majority of the more recognizable national flags and their origin stories, myths and legends. The range is wide and covers all continents. It is full of curious, interesting and entertaining stories of how the flags evolved and what their represent. The book is also an insightful course into the beginning of the cultural identities of these countries as they are represented on the flags. If you are interested in flags, culture and their origins across countries around the world, you will enjoy this a lot.
"When you see your nation's flag fluttering in the breeze, what do you feel?"
"When you see your nation's flag fluttering in the breeze, what do you feel?"
April 12, 2025
The book was full of some very interesting information about why and how nations have chosen the flags that represent their country, and the particular rules surrounding them. I was not quite so taken with the chapters on the British and USA flags, but once the book moved on to the Middle East, Africa and South America it became fascination. I’d always wondered why groups of flags from particular geographical areas looked very similar, and cause great confusion to anyone (ie me) trying to memorise the world’s flags – now I know.
I really disliked the narrator, which definitely lowered my opinion of the book. He spoke very slowly and I had to increase the speed for it to be tolerable. But I particularly objected to him insisting on putting on accents for any person from a country that was not England. Different accents might be useful for works of fiction, for stories where some way of differentiating characters is needed – but NOT for a non-fiction book. It is very annoying and detracts massively from what is being said.
I came very close to giving the audio book 2 stars, but that would be very unfair on the content – which was generally very good – so I’ve decided on 4 stars.
A great book for anyone who enjoys history, or Sheldon Cooper’s ‘Fun with Flags’ – but read a physical copy of the book and avoid the audio book like the plague.
I really disliked the narrator, which definitely lowered my opinion of the book. He spoke very slowly and I had to increase the speed for it to be tolerable. But I particularly objected to him insisting on putting on accents for any person from a country that was not England. Different accents might be useful for works of fiction, for stories where some way of differentiating characters is needed – but NOT for a non-fiction book. It is very annoying and detracts massively from what is being said.
I came very close to giving the audio book 2 stars, but that would be very unfair on the content – which was generally very good – so I’ve decided on 4 stars.
A great book for anyone who enjoys history, or Sheldon Cooper’s ‘Fun with Flags’ – but read a physical copy of the book and avoid the audio book like the plague.
March 12, 2025
Interesting book with some good points about flags and their designs but it felt a bit too unstructured to me (perhaps inevitable in a topic with no central plot as such?), more like a collection of essays. And it really suffered from not enough pictures - in a book on flags you simply cannot just describe them in text! And the pictures that are included, are all set in a wodge of plates in the middle of the book. Some interesting and insightful stuff on Middle Eastern flags (including the various armed groups) but apart from that, rather disappointing.
May 12, 2022
Organised into chapters covering the sources of flags from different continents, or non national flags. It explains the origins of flags by explaining choices of colour, inclusively and ownership. They help to unite a population and also help to give people a common ethos.
April 12, 2024
للمؤلف تيم مارشال كتب قيمة كثيرة، وفي هذا الكتاب يتناول موضوع تاريخ الأعلام للدول والمنظمات المختلفة. ويشرح المعاني المتعلقة بتصميم الأعلام وألوانها ورموزها.
سبق وأن قرأت لهذا المؤلف:
Prisoners of geography
The power of geography
Divided: Why are we living in the age of walls
سبق وأن قرأت لهذا المؤلف:
Prisoners of geography
The power of geography
Divided: Why are we living in the age of walls
May 11, 2021
Not quite as fascinating as Prisoners of Geography, but at least I now know a lot about flags.
June 5, 2020
Sarebbero state anche quattro stelline se non fosse un libro americanocentrico/eurocentrico.
July 3, 2025
Muy liviano y agradable de leer
PD: Me hizo mucha gracia el chiste fácil de que el rostro del "sol de mayo" era idéntico al de Thomas la locomotora 😂
PD: Me hizo mucha gracia el chiste fácil de que el rostro del "sol de mayo" era idéntico al de Thomas la locomotora 😂
Read
November 18, 2022i actually did not finish this book but 90% is good enough😁👍
April 12, 2025
Upřímně řečeno, moc mi to nedalo, pro vexikologii jsem se asi nenarodil. Když už, doporučil bych spíš show "Zábavné vlajky" Sheldona Coopera, jestli si vzpomínáte :)
Displaying 1 - 30 of 494 reviews