So, this is the first romance novel (that was not Outlander) that I've read in ages, thank to the Lisa Challenge. [She challenged her FB friends/followers to read three romance novels this year, with the following stipulations:
-MUST be categorized as romance: the story focuses on two (or more) people of any gender falling in love and they eventually reach a happy ending (which can be HEA--happily ever after, or HFN--happy for now).
-MUST be written since 2000. I love me some 70s-80s bodice rippers, but that is not where the genre is anymore.
-CAN be 'category' romances, i.e. Harlequin, but don't have to be. ]
So, I liked this one, partially because of the fairy-tale parallels, but it really did suffer from the modern book/movie trope of "Wait, let me explain!" and IF YOU JUST TOLD THEM THE THING, THIS WOULD NOT BE A PROBLEM. (TV Tropes may have an official name for this; I don't.)
That said, I enjoyed it enough that I grabbed the other two books in the series because, see above, fairy-tale parallels are neat, and it seems like they all take place in the same world, and characters will come across each other, and I'm really a sucker for that. (It explains why I love Tales of the City SO MUCH.)
Now, for the stuff I didn't love: The bad guy wasn't really adequately established. Like, you got the feeling that he was the bad guy, but there were no overt passages that suggested it. He didn't need to be mustache-twirling Snidely Whiplash the whole time, but a little more foreshadowing wouldn't have hurt.
Second, the steamy scenes were just that, steamy, and I was on board, because they were way better than a) the romance novels I happened upon as a kid, b) V.C. Andrews books, c) any and everything that Laurell K. Hamilton has ever written. HOWEVER, I was weirded out by Ford calling Autumn "little subbie." It was kind of infantilizing, and that's not what I'm reading romance for, yeah?