Arguments Within English Marxism

by Perry Anderson

The characteristic form taken by English Marxism since the war has been the study of history. No writer exemplifies its achievements better than Edward Thompson, whose Making of the English Working Class is probably the most influential single work of historical scholarship by a socialist today. An editor of The New Reasoner in 1957–59, a founder of the New Left in 1960, now an eloquent champion of civil rights, Thompson has most recently aroused widespread interest with the appearance of his Poverty of Theory, which combines philosophical and political polemic with Louis Althusser, and powerful advocacy of the historian’s craft. Arguments Within English Marxism is an assessment of its central theses that relates them to Thompson’s major historical writings themselves. Thus the role of human agency—the part of the conscious choice and active will—in history is discussed through consideration of its treatment in The Making of the English Working Class. The problems of base and superstructure in historical materialism, and of affiliation to values in the past, are reviewed in the light of Whigs and Hunters. The claims of utopian imagination are illustrated from the findings of William Morris. Questions of socialist strategy are broached in part through the articles now collected in Writing by Candlelight. Exploring at once differences and convergences between New Left Review and one of its founders, the essay concludes by suggesting the virtues of diversity within a common socialist culture.

Genres: History, Theory, Philosophy, Nonfiction

226 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1980

About the author

Perry Anderson is an English Marxist intellectual and historian. He is Professor of History and Sociology at UCLA and an editor of the New Left Review. He is the brother of historian Benedict Anderson.

He was an influence on the New Left. He bore the brunt of the disapproval of E.P. Thompson in the latter's The Poverty of Theory, in a controversy during the late 1970s over the scientific Marxism of Louis Althusser, and the use of history and theory in the politics of the Left. In the mid-1960s, Thompson wrote an essay for the annual Socialist Register that rejected Anderson's view of aristocratic dominance of Britain's historical trajectory, as well as Anderson's seeming preference for continental European theorists over radical British traditions and empiricism. Anderson delivered two responses to Thompson's polemics, first in an essay in New Left Review (January-February 1966) called "Socialism and Pseudo-Empiricism" and then in a more conciliatory yet ambitious overview, Arguments within English Marxism (1980).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perry_An...

Reviews

[Emre · Rating 4 out of 5]

Kitabın orjinal ismi olan Arguments Within English Marxism, hem içerikte E.P. Thompson'ı ve çalışmalarını merkezine alarak yoğun bir kritik getiren Perry Anderson'un niyetini daha iyi ifade ediyor hem de kitabın geniş bir alana sahip olan Marksist literatürden sınırlandırılarak ayrılmasını sağlıyor; Türkçe basımda orjinal isme sadık kalınması daha tutarlı olurdu.
Kendisinin de dahil olduğu tarihçiler kuşağı ve İngiliz Yeni Solu hakkında içeriden konuşan Anderson, Thompson'la mukayeseli olarak Althusser'ın teorik ve politik tavır alışlarını, Stalinist ve Troçkist etkileri, William Morris'in ütopik edebi üretimine ve sosyalist strateji üzerine erken öngörülerine harika bir eleştirel pencere açan değerli bir metinle karşımızda duruyor.

[AleSanSil · Rating 4 out of 5]

Interesante debate. Estoy más de acuerdo con Anderson que con Thompson en temas como la definición de clase, la estrategia socialista o el papel del trotskismo; en la cuestión nacional/internacional creo que hay un amplio espacio intermedio mucho más sólido que las posiciones de los dos autores y en lo referente al énfasis de Thompson en la acción humana pienso que su enfoque es más interesante que el de Anderson. Aunque pueda haber alguna mala interpretación o exceso en el combate de Thompson contra Althusser, en líneas generales veo correctas sus críticas y me parece un total desacierto de Anderson haber escrito para defender al francés.

[bautista · Rating 4 out of 5]

parece más un alegato a favor de althusser que un debate o una revisión de los conceptos de thompson por momentos pero los argumentos están muy bien expuestos y se notan las buenas intenciones de anderson