The Johnson Project would best be categorized as a medical-science fiction futuristic thriller, but somehow Amazon hasn't rated it as Scifi, when the book has what is an almost dystopian futuristic setting. In 2017, all women on the planet have become infertile. No one knows the cause.
Over a period of two years, the World Health Organization sets up an elite research council devoted to investigate. The ramifications on the future of the earth are dire. In the USA, a powerful think tank develops a new economic plan to protect and enrich the quality of the lives of all citizens, destabilizing corporations built on greed. But the vision of a dying human race fills everyone with dread...
Margaret Johnson is the powerful head of the philanthropic Johnson Foundation, and mother to Ted, Rafael and Nora. Each of them are advocates in their own ways: Ted is a fertility specialist; Rafael consults for school districts as its psychiatrist with pregnant teens; Nora is an attorney battling to save children from abusive homes, in court.
The "bones" of this futuristic tale are very good. Spurned by the egotistical head of the research group, Ted Johnson proceeds to his laboratory independently. Miraculously he discovers - not a cure- but a substance, of limited amounts, which could make it possible for some couples to have a child. It is named "The Johnson Project". There is uproar over who will be chosen. Subterfuge and medical espionage are feared, a newspaper man becomes an exceptional detective and outrageous secrets are eventually divulged.
Some competent early readers and a good editor could have turned this concept into a really outstanding story. The first half of the book needed more solid transitions between settings; chapters which opened with dialogue and ended the same really did disservice to such a great integral theme. Main characters had names and professions but no visual impression, to make them distinctive initially, though as tension built their parts in the drama became significant. There are some grammatical errors which were missed. Most importantly, a good editor would have seen that Spence's short, sweet and entirely appropriate ending needed to be two, one word paragraphs to give the reader the full impact.
I enjoyed the "what-if" idea of this novel, and underlying idealistic possibilities that somehow out of our messy world and its scary dystopian future, there was hope that the purest and best ideals could create a perfect world. I also thoroughly enjoyed, and DID NOT SEE COMING, the conundrums which a hidden criminal, so perfectly, could create.
3.4 stars - (Therefore 3 stars) I so wish that GOODREADS had that 3.5 rating.
*I found The Johnson Project when the author became a follower on Twitter, where my blog and GR reviews are tweeted. Maggie Spence was offering a book lottery chance, for which I didn't qualify because of my country of origin, so she personally sent me a copy. Thank you to Maggie Spence, author for the free copy of her e-book available on Amazon.com.