Mad About the Mekong, by John Keay
HarperCollins, 2005
I picked this up while rooting around the travel section in the library looking for a travelogue on mainland Southeast Asia. Well, specifically on Vietnam. I’ve been kind of obsessed with Vietnam since I went there last year, and it’s kind of frustrated me that nearly all the English-language literature I find about the country is about the Vietnam War. It’s as though, in the international consciousness, the place didn’t exist before the war, and now that the war has ended it has returned to its normal state of non-existence and irrelevance.
Yeah, well, anyway. End of Asian History student rant.
Mad About the Mekong isn’t exactly a travelogue; it’s more of an historical account. It’s about the French Mekong Exploration Commission, spurred on by their desire for colonial expansion into the region, in order to compete with other European powers and their imperial expanses. With India and China already snapped up, as it were, by the other colonial powers, what was left for the French were just the vast swamplands of the Mekong Delta. Sandwiched as they are between South and East Asia, between India and China, these lands were soon to become collectively dubbed ‘Indo-China’ by the French in their desperate hopes to see the region match up to its two namesakes.
As Keay points out, the expedition is not particularly well-known today, despite the heavy task of mapping and scientifically examining the Mekong River and its surroundings that they undertook. Before I go any further, I think it would explain a lot it I pointed out that Keay is British, because the introduction of the book does consist of a lot of juxtaposition between the British and the French colonial attitudes – which is tangentially related to the Mekong expedition, I suppose.
According to Keay, the British are somehow more at ease and more nostalgic with their imperial heritage than the French are; the French are more likely to condemn as an outright business move, made to keep economically competitive with the rest of Europe, without any overt noble intentions. I’m not quite sure which of these views Keay espouses – possibly neither, just a vague sheepishness about the whole affair. I’m not sure I agree with his brief
The Commission, as it turns out, didn't go too well. The problems that face the explorers come fast and thick, in an almost farcical manner – malaria, torrential rains, inconsistent water levels forcing them to abandon their barge and take to kayaks, imposing rapids forcing them to abandon the river altogether and take to dry land...
The title “Mad About the Mekong” is a translation of a line written by Francis Garnier, the unofficial second-in-command on the bungling expedition – “monomanie de Mekong”. Garnier is described as some kind of unpleasant, overly-precocious toff with hideous pretension who thinks too highly of himself. Actually the interaction between the members of the Commission is a pretty interesting study in group dynamics, though I must admit that I felt like the interpersonal stuff wasn't nearly as extensive as I'd have hoped for. To be fair, that's probably due to the lack of information available - their journals focus more on their observations than on sniping at each other, and rightly so - so I think it would be fair to say that Keay actually did a pretty good job in making these historical characters interesting with the limited sources available.
What I liked most about Mad About the Mekong, though, is the way it juxtaposes the Mekong Delta of the past with how it is today. The area, of course, has seen a great many developments in the years since the Expedition – colonial rule; decades of underground resistance; wars in Vietnam, Burma, Cambodia; suffering, destruction, death; the establishment of communist states; the creation of new states of people who do not consider themselves and their cultures similar in any way. It is simply fascinating to think about how the geopolitical situation in the region has changed so much in the years that have elapsed (colonial powers tussling for prominence, the creation of Laos as a result, etc.) and yet how similar it still is in so many ways. All these years later, as Keay puts it, the region stays impenetrable and dense, remains – as it has always been – “the Heart of Darkness”. Cue Jim Morrison and The End.
Yes, despite my lament about wanting to read stuff about the region that doesn't bring up the ‘American War’, this book does in fact bring up the 'American War'. Quite honestly, though, the current situation in the region is so tied up with the war, has been so shaped by it, that to attempt to describe how the region has changed in the years since the Commission embarked on their journey of exploration would be a horrendous omission. So, you know, at the end of the day I'm not going to complain about Keay's references to Conrad and Coppola (Francis Ford, not Sophia or Nicholas Cage), because acknowledging that they actually do matter is totally intrinsic to a comprehensive understanding of mainland Southeast Asia as it is today. And, as I said earlier, the comparisons between the past and the present is what I really liked about this book.
So, yeah, this is a balanced look at a very specific aspect of French colonial expansion in Southeast Asia, an adventure into unfamiliar territory with a nice dollop of drama and infighting for people who like that sort of thing (I know I do, as long as I'm not directly involved). I enjoyed it, and when I actually was able to find the time to read it I was genuinely hooked. 4 stars.