John Lewis has provided us with a valuable account of the life of AT Still. I commend his thoroughly researched work.
A.T. Still: From the Dry Bone to the Living Man is helpful for anyone who wants to understand the roots of osteopathy. To the 21st-century man who thinks osteopathy is quackery, Lewis shows how rational the treatment was in its time. When doctors were regularly poisoning patients with unsubstantiated drugs, Still based his treatments on meticulous observation of the anatomical structure as it related to function--developing rational sound manipulations that could provide significant relief to the body. Such is a lost art as physicians today are no longer interested in pouring over a body's structure for disfunction. They have instead put their faith in pharmaceuticals and surgery, lining their coffers in the process. In the vacuum, chiropractors and PTs have now become the foremost experts in manual therapy.
Philosophically, AT Still's osteopathic principles were more influenced by Native American pantheism than the Methodism of his father. The terminology he used in explaining his treatment is laced with spiritual references to the great teacher of nature and the perfection of the body. Such was not as taboo in an age when magnetic healing and homeopathy were legitimate forms of medicine, yet I believe many are uneasy with osteopathy because they find Still's language lacking in light of recent scientific discoveries. His mechanisms of disease and treatment are imprecise, even if generally true. For example, Still was able to describe the immune system as the general principle that the body has everything it needs to heal itself, years before we formally identified the antibodies, antigens, and leukocytes that make it work.
Still was like the ancient mathematicians who were able to manipulate numbers to predict the movement of solar bodies. These calculations were miraculous in their time, even if we have now reached a deeper and more accurate understanding of mathematics. Our view toward our predecessors shouldn't be one of shame and embarrassment of what they did not understand, but honor toward what they were able to understand in a world of ignorance.
Today's physician can remain an osteopath in principle while adopting modern medicine's more meticulous evidence-based treatments by using their hands to diagnose and treat, privileging observation, developing an instinct to optimize the body before introducing foreign substances, and maintaining the transcendent parts of medicine.