Describing this work as a 'survey' would be generous. Profoundly derivative, it is poorly cited, and uncritical of its sources. Far from a targeted work on key historical figures, the book is supremely tedious in its encyclopedic effort, yet stocking in its omissions. The author rightly nods to the luminaries of the field, but utterly fails in honoring their traditions. Managing to dabble in western cynicism, and apologetic glorification in one brush. A grasp of historiography is also in deficit in this work, which cites not a single primary source, and it preforms not even a token bout of analysis.
As a survey it has virtually no value, its' rambling and compressed text gives nothing original and does nothing to clarify other works. No part of this book is superior in anyway to its source material. Without contribution or correlation, its' base virtues would be in question without the author's clear and obvious bias. This last addition, not even original it is impingement, makes a tedious work intolerable. Bereft of any academic merit, too tedious for causal readers, and without any redeeming insight or view, I was profoundly dissatisfied with the work.