Exploring the Origins of the Bible: Canon Formation in Historical, Literary, and Theological Perspective

Acadia Studies in Bible and Theology

by Craig A. Evans (Series Editor)

How did the Bible we have come to be? What do biblical scholars mean when they talk about canon, the Septuagint, the Apocrypha, or the Masoretic Text? All this biblical study is interesting, but does it really matter? Leading international scholars explain that it does. This thought-provoking and cutting-edge collection will help you go deeper in your understanding of the biblical writings, how those writings became canonical Scripture, and why canon matters. Beginning with an explanation of the different versions of the Hebrew Bible, scholars in different areas of expertise explore the complexities and issues related to the Old and New Testament canons, why different Jewish and Christian communities have different collections, and the importance of canon to theology.

Genres: Biblical Studies, Religion, Nonfiction, Theology, Christianity, Archaeology, History

272 pages, Paperback

First published October 1, 2008

About the author

Craig A. Evans (PhD, Claremont Graduate University) is Payzant Distinguished Professor of New Testament at Acadia Divinity College in Wolfville, Nova Scotia. He is a frequent contributor to scholarly journals and the author or editor of numerous publications.

Reviews

[Mark Sequeira]

This is a great book exploring the creation and pulling together of the Bible as we know it as well as the importance of the Septuagint (Greek O.T.) to our understanding of inspiration. As widely disparaged as it sometimes is, it is surprising that Jesus and the inspired authors of the N.T. chose to quote from the Septuagint more than half the time when there is a difference with the Hebrew O.T. and upwards to 94% of the time if we include every reference whether in agreement with the Hebrew or not. Didn't they know better? What's more, Jews in the first century believed the Greek O.T. translation was as inspired and authoritative as the original. Interesting as the Greek used was poor, just as the New Testament was written in a grocer's, crude greek spoken on the street rather than an older, classical Greek. This book definitely discusses first century struggles and views of inspiration as well as our own, which are very different as a result of our critical, scientific, and modern technology, the internet and the printing press.



It also gets into what books were included in the N.T. and used in the first century churches, as well as left out such as the Shepherd of Hermas, 1-2 Clement and the Psalms of Solomon. As someone who has already read these and a number of other later, sometimes gnostic texts, it is interesting that the church was still considering, praying over and and reserving judgement on a number of them, allowing them to be used in services but not committing to their inspiration. Same holds true of 1-2 Peter, Hebrews, Revelation, Jude, and in some instances the pastoral letters. As Revelation was often left out and the Shepherd of Hermas included, it does make you want to go back and read some of these texts to see what we might be missing, at least as good Chr. literature from the first century.



This was a process and while it may unsettle some, the openness and honesty with which the church dealt with letters and teachings before condemning or using texts should inspire us that they were not censoring or being rash but seriously seeking light in a time before all the writings were in. This plus the difficulty of access and communication before printing or the phone when transcribing was so phenomenally expensive causes one to understand a bit more the challenge why things took as long as they did.



We should be grateful to live when we do, with access to resources and a great text as close to the original manuscripts as we are likely to get and worlds closer than most older documents in existence. Most of us have libraries that would be the center of the learned world back in the day, rivaling kings and universities.



This is not a beginner's guide to the Bible. It is easy to read however and all earnest students will find something of interest whether they agree with a little or a lot.



The book is written as a series of articles/lectures from April 2006 dealing with the Septuagint, writings outside the canon, the Torah, the roole of the Septuagint in the formation of the canon, the Apocryphal Jesus, Paul and the process of canonization and Wherein lies authority? as well as Canon and Theology: What is at stake?



Contributors include:

James H. Charlesworth

Stephen G. Dempster

Craig A. Evans

Lee Martin McDonald

Stanley E. Porter

Emanuel Tov

Jonathan R. Wilson

R. Glenn Wooden

[Ben · Rating 4 out of 5]

This is overall a helpful collection of essays offering clarity into the history of the Bible and its development.

[Anatolikon · Rating 5 out of 5]

First off, it is important to mention that this is not a "book" in the traditional sense. It is a collection of academic articles, and as such, a selection of them will be reviewed instead of the "book" as a whole, since it really does not exist. It starts off with a short essay by Craig Evans, introducing the contents of various versions of the Bible. Scholars and serious students can skip over this section, since there is likely to be nothing for them here, although for the absolute beginner this is an excellent section that brings up the topics of the Septuagint (hereafter, LXX), apocrypha, the Masoretic tradition, and the Samaritan Pentateuch, as well as some introduction to Hebrew terminology and a few brief notes on the Syriac tradition and the Latin Vulgate. I discuss three of the articles briefly below:

The first article is by Emanuel Tov, one of the heaviest hitters in Jewish historical scholarship today. In it, he discusses the differences between the LXX and the Masoretic texts. His goal is to determine whether particular problem passages are more accurately preserved in the LXX or the Masoretic tradition by examining how free the LXX translation is, whether there are presence of Hebraisms, or external evidence. He applies this to a number of case studies in the Old Testament, and comes to some interesting results, ultimately arguing that the LXX is just as important to the study of scripture as the Masoretic texts, as they both represent different stages of the tradition. My only criticism is that this is the first article, which seems a little strange because it can be rather complex at times, and yet the traditional reader will have only just experienced Evans' rather basic introduction. For a book that claims to appeal to beginners and scholars alike, this is a bit of an odd choice.

The second article is by the also-renowned J.H. Charlesworth dealing with the formation of the canon. He discusses the origin of the term and how the canonization of the Hebrew Bible came about, suggesting that it was a long and drawn-out process. He touches on a wide variety of topics, including the origin of different canons of various Christian churches, and works that were on the fringe of canon. Given his expertise in that particular field, his insight is appreciated, and he argues for the necessity of the use of apocryphal and Pseudepighraphal works, as they can provide us with a lot of information about trends and concerns in periods not covered by the Bible. On top of that, some are simply excellent literature, Charlesworth argues.

Evans' article is a very typical one for him, as he is doing little more than attacking the views of some scholars that he disagrees with. He claims that the purpose of the article is to assess whether apocryphal gospels are of any use in the study of the historical Jesus. It quickly becomes apparent that he is targeting particular scholars in each of the texts that he examines, but this does not detract from the article at all. On the contrary, it is a very good read and has the sense of being in the battlefield of the particular debate, one that Evans seems to be winning. He dicusses the Gospel of Thomas, the fragment that may be the Gospel of Peter mentioned by Irenaeus (although N.T. Wright disagrees with him on this particular topic, they agree that the text does not tell us anything about the historical Jesus), the Egerton papyrus, and Secret Mark. Each of these discussions is lively and fascinating, and demonstrate why Evans is considered to be on the top of the field.

There are five more articles in this book, and minus one, I learned a lot from all of them and they were all interesting. G. Wooden discusses how the LXX was used in the early church and what affect it had on canon. S. Dempster talks about the tripartite Jewish canon, and how it came to be. S. Porter discusses the effects of Paul's writing on canonization in the early church. All of these articles are well-worth reading, and are geared for a serious audience. If it has a fault, it is that there is no paper on the later canonization of the New Testament and Christian Bible, but given the quality of work contained within, I fully recommend these papers.

[Felicity Chen · Rating 4 out of 5]

Not like ground breaking or anything but a good overview of the material! I specifically enjoyed the parts on the development of the sections of the Hebrew Bible. Nice outline of the different early translation versions. Pretty quick and easy read at about 250 pages (many of which were bibliography).

[David · Rating 3 out of 5]

The first four chapters deal with issues related to the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament). Very informative in regards to the process which brought the books of the Old Testament together into one collection. The first chapter was very slow and probably more for those who specialize in Old Testament studies, making it an odd choice to start the book.

I got the book for the second half, which deals with the New Testament, as I am teaching on these topics this fall. Each of these four chapters was well done, especially Craig Evans' on the problems with "other gospels" such as the Gospel of Thomas. Also enlightening was Stanley Porter's chapter on the process of bringing Paul's letters together into a collection; I had not thought much about that before.

Overall, a good book if you want to learn about how the Bible came together and historical issues related to that. But there are better books to start with and I would not recommend it for your first foray into that world.

[Ted · Rating 3 out of 5]

Some good information especially about the common use of the Septuagint by the New Testament authors. One author in the book claims 94% of the time the NT quotes the Greek OT, not the Hebrew or Aramaic.