The Second Edition provides a comprehensive introduction to interdisciplinary studies with an approach that is succinct, conceptual, and practical. Completely updated to reflect advances in the literature on research, learning, and assessment, the book describes the role of both disciplines and interdisciplinarity within the academy, and how these have evolved. Authors Allen F. Repko, Rick Szostak, and Michelle Phillips Buchberger effectively show students how to think like interdisciplinarians in order to facilitate their working with topics, complex problems, or themes that span multiple disciplines.
Clear direction on interdisciplinary studies. The chapters are formatted well and are a good length. I had to read this for a class, but felt I got a lot out of the book.
Three strengths of the text book are as follows. I like how the text illustrates complex ideas and outlines them in diagram form quite well. I am a visual learner and as such I like to see complex ideas illustrated out in diagram form. I thought the diagrams were thought-provoking and well done in conveying the concepts of the book. I especially liked and used Table 5.4 on pages 222 and 223 of the text explaining the categories, disciplines and phenomena they study. Complex theoretical ideas explained in accessible ways and simple terms making it easily digestible and understandable. I felt the author did a great job of thoroughly explaining interdisciplinary study and its different aspects. The book was well written (in grammar and flow); it has some nice examples and rubrics to help people who struggle with identifying interdisciplinary work. Being my first class in a long time as a student, I felt the text was quite simple to read with nice illustrations. I also feel it is important to keep the budget of text books low with little to no use of color. The author used just enough so as not to increase the cost, but make certain elements stand out.
The weaknesses of the text are as follows. While I appreciated the simplicity of the text, sometimes I wanted it to be more complex. I felt like it took the author many, many words to convey a simple point. I would have liked more real-world illustrations and stories and examples on points and less redundancy and repetition. Perhaps it's my business background which makes interdisciplinary ideas of cross subject integration a necessity when solving problems, but I felt like some of the ideas and concepts were so widely used within the business setting that they were not necessarily a new concept. I can see where in an academic setting the ideas, research, etc., would be more single disciplinary; but in a business setting, it is critical when achieving a goal. If you want to be successful in a business environment, it is even a must! In any given week, you are using multi-disciplines to solve challenges. In that respect, I felt it was somewhat trite. Probably the biggest weakness, at times, I felt, the author seemed pretentious and almost to be patting himself on the back for studying something other than his chosen discipline. I will admit, I had the occasional eye-roll as I read about the author’s experiences of using interdisciplinary objectivity in completing tasks, projects and research. Like I said before in a business setting, you have to look at challenges from as many perspectives as you can. I understand specialties in education, but I think the lines of interdisciplinary are crossed more and more, and it is not a unique concept.