"Waltz With Bashir" is a reflection on war and memory. It tries to take a clearer and closer look at how vulnerable we all are to the stories we are told, to the narrative tug of our own survival mechanisms. I think it tries to show that reflection can be a radical act. That when our bodies, our nervous systems are in fight or flight mode during war-time, meaningful reflection is impossible or very close to impossible, but that doesn't mean reflection later in life, uncovering the difficult truths of war-time, isn't meaningful. It won't bring back murdered civilians, soldiers, friends, family, but it does honor their memories, and that is not nothing. If we could all just take accountability for our parts in conflict, armed and otherwise, as painful as it is, well, I think relationships between people and nations could really take a turn for the better. But, on the whole it seems we're not that kind of primate.
So, I appreciate the questioning in this book. About the nature of war and memory. And the interesting address of the challenge of stopping--in the war-time moment--massacres and abuses and injustices. They happen to some degree during all wars (I don't think there's ever been a war free of it) and they are not easy to stop. It would take 1) awareness that the massacre is happening, and that it is not a necessary part of the war, which can seem much more obvious when one isn't dodging bullets and extra vulnerable to highly-charged, fear-mongering and/or dehumanizing narratives 2) the courage to risk one's own safety in order to intervene 3) an organized approach to intervention so that one's risk does not end very quickly and likely violently and with little fanfare.
So this book is a meditation on the muddled nature of memory as it relates to war, and the helplessness people feel in the face of horrors that they participate in or witness. In this case a person gradually wakes to these horrors in his own past. (This isn't always the case. Sometimes people keep them stuffed down deep or don't see a reason to question such events. Not everyone has an interest in reflecting on their war-time experiences in a critical way, and not everyone thinks massacres are bad.)
Maybe the best we can hope for is the ability to, with as much honesty and curiosity as we can muster, reflect on forces at play in our world. The book tells us that this kind of reflection is a meaningful quest, and perhaps more of an odyssean quest than war itself. It calls on a very different set of skills and kinds of bravery, and hopefully allows for the possibility of reparation. And reparation has powers war can't even dream of. At least, that is what I am choosing to believe at this moment.
So, I'm glad this book exists, but it seems unfinished, like it can't quite stand on its own without the film. It has the feel of an outline, not fully fledged. I wish it would have gone on its own unique journey. Spent more time exploring the questions about memory and war on its own terms. Still, it's an effort at opening up an important conversation, and a courageous one at that.