What does the word "Dickensian" convey to you? An old-fashioned Christmas perhaps, with families collected together around an open fire, admiring the Christmas tree laden with presents and lights, chatting and sipping mulled wine, indulging themselves from a table laden with glorious food, extra treats such as sweetmeats and roast chestnuts, children excitedly romping about and playing party games; all as the snow cascades down outside? Dickens certainly presented a very attractive picture of home life, and is partly responsible for our nostalgic view of a perfect Christmas. If your knowledge of Victorian times is mostly from fiction, you may well have a fairly romanticised idea, and not realise that the author has glossed over the less savoury facts. And Dickens at his most sentimental was also to blame.
Yet whereas many authors concentrated on the middle classes, the gentry and the rich, Dickens was one of the few authors who had great sympathy for the poor. He wrote campaigning, persuasive fiction, in which many of his fully rounded characters were drawn from both the working and the middle classes. Perhaps if you have read his novels, to you "Dickensian" conjures up an image of grime and wretchedness, disease and abject poverty; of slums, workhouses, schools and prisons with "Dickensian conditions".
So which, if either, of these is a true picture of Victorian times? In his own time Charles Dickens was enormously popular, a flamboyant, larger-than-life, convivial character, equally loved both by Queen Victoria and the illiterate poorest of the poor, who would crowd into any space where his latest serialisations were being read aloud or dramatised for their entertainment. His works - melodramatic and humorous by turn - had immense appeal. And for those people of the time London was a hotch-potch of different sights, smells, and sounds. There was not one London but a myriad of different Londons according to your status and class, whether you were rich or poor, male or female. And if your view of Victorian London has up to now been a rose-tinted view, then this book will certainly disabuse you of that notion. It is a revelatory read about this sprawling city in Victorian times, warts and all.
During the nineteenth century the city of London burgeoned into the largest city in the world. From what had formerly been a Regency town it grew in a few short decades to be an immense mass of people, buildings, and the new railways. With Victoria's reign came the dawn of industrialisation; life was changing as never before. By the end of it, in this new metropolis, were grouped over 6.5 million people, most of whom spent most of their time in the streets. Judith Flanders shows in meticulous detail that despite all the changes, life was still lived, in the main, outside.
She maintains that Dickens appealed to everybody because he gave them a voyage into the unknown - into unfamiliar parts of London where they would not venture. For London was not even constant from year to year; the city was constantly changing and evolving, with the construction of the railways and sewers, new buildings shooting up everywhere, plus all the slum clearance. All was hustle and bustle; this was a city aways on the move. And Dickens was at the heart of everything, watching and recording what he saw.
Exactly two hundred years after he was born, in 2012, Judith Flanders published this book, The Victorian City: Everyday Life in Dickens' London following on from her earlier popular books on the Victorian house, Victorian crime and Victorian leisure. She approaches the book from the perspective of a social historian, trying capture all the variety and colour; life in the capital in all its vibrancy and its squalor. What brings this book to life, and also what makes this book unique, is that throughout she refers to the works of the great Charles Dickens. The book is peppered with examples, mostly from his novels, but also from his journalism and other writing. For a Dickens enthusiast, some parts are irresistible, adding depth to familiar situations and events.
"Dickens created London as much as London created Dickens."
Most biographies of Dickens concur that more than anything else, he was an observer of his city and his people. He himself seemed to recognise this. Judith Flanders says that Dickens,
"describes London like a special correspondent for posterity".
It was an inspiration to include the references to Dickens, as he was fascinated by London, and was so very knowledgeable about it. He would obsessively pace the city streets every day (at the speed of between 4 and 5 miles an hour) recording the slightest detail for use in his writing. So to read an account of the information behind his stories; information which would have been familar to his contemporaries but now seems strange or even weird, is very appealing. By using Dickens to illustrate the facts, Flanders can create a vivid picture of London during that time, and thus show both the differences and the similarilities with the present day.
The book is divided into four sections: "The City Wakes", "Staying Alive", "Enjoying Life", and "Sleeping and Awake". In this way, the author tries to loosely hold together the facts within. But the topics are very broad, and often what is described could fit into any of these sections. It is not a book which could easily be used as a reference book. To obvert this, Flanders has devoted many pages at the end to lists, appendices and "endnotes", many of which are fascinating in themselves, but are not everyone's chosen way of reading. It could be argued that incorporating these in the text would provide a smoother read, but then that would not address the problem of cross-referencing.
Judith Flanders says that she is attempting to,
"look at the streets of London as Dickens and his fellow Londoners saw it, to examine its workings, to take a walk, in effect through the city, as it appeared in Dickens' lifetime, from 1812 to 1870."
and to take her first steps on the walk she introduces a host of characters from chimney sweeps to midwives, representatives of most of the tradespeople of Victorian London, royalty and the church by a retelling of the 1810 Berner Street Hoax. This was an occasion when dozens of people were all summoned to one place by an eccentric joker who remained anonymous.
The players are now in position for the first Act, "The City Wakes" ...
This "First Act" contains four chapters. "Early to Rise", "On the Road", "Travelling" and "In and Out of London". There was no such thing as a "working day" in Victorian London. This was a city always on the move; even in the middle of the night people were trudging around. Perhaps they were going to work, perhaps returning from it. But everybody walked - and walked long distances to get to where they needed to be. The hours of work were by modern standards exhausting. A normal day could be four miles to walk to work, then a working day of twelve hours, followed by a four mile walk home. And this would be repeated six days a week.
In this section the reader gets the impression of a place of great noise and bustle, crowded with street hawkers, music and markets. Each day would start with many different types of roving street vendors shouting out the names of their wares, all according to different regular schedules. And throughout the day,
"Householders opened their doors, and screamed out "Muffins" with all their might,"
says Dickens. Judith Flanders even goes into how much it cost to buy each kind of food from every different kind of street vendor. Tightly packed streams of workers walked to and fro at all times of day. Many of the inhabitants complained that they never had any peace because of the constant roar of the streets. The streets were not only unbelievably noisy and crowded, but filthy with coal smoke, dung from the horse-drawn carriages wafted into the air, and the mud that was thrown up. Jo - or his equivalent in real life - the tragic crossing sweeper from "Bleak House", was known to everybody, doing his vital backbreaking work cleaning the same section of street every day. Yet he would be classed as a vagrant and eventually "moved on". Nobody ever thought to question, where to?
Since the main mode of transport was still horses (tens of thousands of them) drawing carts, there was a vast amount of horse dung deposited which needed to be removed. Feed needed to be brought in and stored, horses needed stabling, and eventually their carcasses had to be disposed of. Judith Flanders describes all this, going into details about slaughter houses and glue factories, and the incredible stench and pollution of the city which resulted.
The obvious difference between lifestyles of the rich and poor come through in every detail. Lighting on cabs and carriages was essential. Grand balls and the "season" for the wealthy ran very late, until 3am at the earliest, often far later. By the time the rich aristocracy were travelling home in their cabriolets, the lamplighters of Victorian London would be beginning to light the much needed gaslights. There is also a detailed description of the different methods of transport, omnibuses, and all the many accidents. The descriptions of "commuting" may help a reader to put things in perspective when grumbling about modern day traffic jams, which bear no relation to the horrors of riding the newly introduced omnibuses in Victorian London.
Judith Flanders carefully chronicles the various forms of road surfacing such as - surprisingly - wood. There are a dozen pages on macadam road surfacing. There is also a section about which waterways used to flow into the Thames, which seems a little tedious. However, others may find these technical details very interesting.
The next section, "Staying Alive" begins with 1861's Tooley Street Fire, and also contains 4 chapters: "The World's Market", "Selling the Streets", "Slumming", and "The Waters of Death". Chapters on air pollution, over-capacity graveyards, and the vast cesspool underlying London are a shocking and depressing read. On almost every page there is a startling fact or statistic - sometimes a revelation - which makes the reader stop in their tracks for a while to try to absorb some of the flood of information.
"Previously, the rich and poor had lived in the same districts; the rich in the main streets, the poor in the service streets behind. As London expanded ... the houses of the poor were demolished ... their residents were forced into ... slums."
The result of people crowded into spaces far too small for them was inevitable. The author gives an example of many families all living around one courtyard, with only only toilet between all the people, who numbered over a hundred. The stench grew and grew, and eventually in an incredible knee-jerk response to the outcry, the toilet was destroyed! The people then had nowhere else to go to defecate, except in the streets, or in the Thames. All the objections about the smell and filthy conditions led to the clearance of the slums; a horrific catalogue of suffering, as it was done without a thought for where people could move to.
Sometimes the rich didn't seem to even know of the poor's existence, because toll gates kept one side apart from another, even though they were in close proximity. Today in London there are a mere handful of tolls. But in Dickens' London there were well over a hundred. Ironically questions were raised in Parliament three times about reducing the number, but this resulted in the number soaring - because it was to the Corporation of London's benefit.
For a large part of the century almost every building was perched over a cesspool of sewage. Those lucky enough to sleep under cover - and frequently there would be dozens of people crammed into one room to sleep - would be in a house where the only place to put human excrement was the cellar, or to tip it into the Thames. Cellars were regularly filled up with human waste. Joseph Bazalgette was a pioneer of civil engineering, who introduced the sewer network for central London in response to the "Great Stink" of 1858. This began the cleansing of the river Thames, and put an end to the outbreak of cholera epidemics. Although most readers have probably heard of Joseph Bazalgette, this book really brings home the immense difference his innovations made. Sometimes the reader wonders how anyone could survive living in London at all.
The descriptions of the graveyards are an eyeopener. London did not know what to do with the sheer number of corpses since the population explosion. Graveyards were not the restful and peaceful places they now are, but were piled high with corpses. Starting off as pits in the ground, they were gradually built up and up until they were higher than an average person. And corpses regularly broke the surface. This book does give you an insight into the stench and putrefaction there must have been.
The third section, "Enjoying Life", begins with the 1867 Regent's Park Skating Disaster, where many people fell through the ice and drowned, indicating that even when Londoners were enjoying themselves life was cheap, and could end at any moment. To live to the age of 55 was quite an achievement. This section of the book is the liveliest and most enjoyable in terms of variety, rather than shocking descriptions and statistics. It has four chapters on "Street Performance", "Leisure for all", "Feeding the Streets", and "Street theatre".
Judith Flanders goes into the accents and dialects used by different social groups. Her explanation of the vernacular in Dickens' works is fascinating. Charles Dickens is an author who revels in pronunciation, and invents specific idiolects for some characters, for instance Sairey Gamp (Mrs Gamp in "Martin Chuzzlwit".) Also, many readers local to London may assume that Dickens simply made a mistake in transposing the "v"s and "w"s in the character of Sam Weller in "The Pickwick Papers". This may seem puzzling, as Dickens knew London intimately. This book explains that some modes of speech and slang were only used for about a decade - and suddenly it all makes sense.
"Vom-us! I'm going to do the tightener [have my dinner]."
"Vom-us" is from the more familiar "vamoose", which is in turn from the Spanish "vamos", or "let's go". "Tightener" is just a colourful way of saying that when you eat well your clothes get tight!
Judith Flanders explains many Victorian London memes - catchphrases which went through a vogue - and also Cockney rhyming slang which is still used to this very day.
Victorians in London seemed to be the original "fast food generation". Few people had the facilities to cook at home, and most of the working class ate their food outside, bought from various vendors and carts. There are many references in Dickens to this, and also to "cook shops" where prepared food is taken to the shop and cooked in their ovens. In "David Copperfield", when Traddles visits, David's landlady goes to a cook shop to have their food cooked. Bakeries sometimes left their windows open, so that customers could reach in and grab a pastry and leave some money. And,
"A pie cost a penny, but all piemen were willing to toss a coin for one: if the customer won, he got the pie for free; if the pieman won, the pieman kept both pie and penny."
"There was even a trade in used tea leaves. In most households, after the tea had been made, the leaves were rinsed, dried and sprinkled on the carpets before sweeping, to help collect the dust. Once this had been done, some charwomen sold the leaves to unscrupulous dealers who mixed them with new tea leaves, selling the tea at bargain prices. It was these very women and their kind who were most likely to purchase the lowest-priced tea, and who were drinking what they had lately swept up."
"Today, eating out is more expensive than cooking at home, but in the 19th century the situation was reversed."
This is the time when most of the clubs and pubs were established - and some of them are there to this day.
But the section on animal markets is possibly the most upsetting in the book to a modern eye. The sheer brutality of treatment of both farm and wild animals in Smithfield market, where "Cruelty was the norm", beggars belief.
The final section, "Sleeping and Awake", is prefaced by an account of the 1852 funeral of the Duke of Wellington. It has just three chapters: "Night Entertainment", "Street Violence" and "The Red-Lit Streets to Death".
Judith Flanders has succeeded in her aim to show life on the streets of Dickens' London in colourful, fascinating detail. But perhaps it is a book to "dip into" rather than to read straight through. It is certainly difficult to retain the cornucopia of information contained in this book. It is also not advisable to read it on an ereader. The illustrations are fascinating and detailed, mostly contemporaneous drawings, maps, watercolours and etchings from the time, which need to be closely examined to be seen at their best advantage. The main text of the book also stops at 65%, the rest being footnotes, cross-references, endnotes and various lists. As mentioned before, in some ways it is more of an academic textbook.
Just as Dickens does, Judith Flanders makes quite a few assumptions. The book is very geographically specific, darting from one location to another, assuming a familarity with London which many of her readers will not have. It also assumes substantial foreknowledge of English history. The work is not chronological, but set out by theme. The ordering throughout is fairly random - as if the author spontaneously goes off at a tangent when another fact occurs to her. This can be rather confusing for the reader, to constantly switch between several different centuries.
Dickens assumed his readers were familiar with what he described. A modern author however, should not assume that in our rapidly expanding world all her readers interested in this book will be familiar with the details of London's topography - even down to the street names - and English history. It really is a "curate's egg". Parts of it do not flow well, or are of interest to many people. Some sections of the book are more entertaining than others - but different chapters will appeal to different people, so it is a difficult book to assess generally. The author's style for a general reader, not wishing to read an academic work, may seem on occasion rather dry.
For this reason, it has to be rated 3* overall: 4* for effort and research, and 2* for structure. There is a formidable amount of research, but just because something has a vast amount of detail, has been well researched and the author has spent a lot of time putting together quite a complete account, does not mean it is a pleasure to read. Often reading this book, a reader may feel they are flooded with information. At times it is almost as if the author didn't want to waste any of her valuable research, so just flung everything she had discovered into the book in a haphazard fashion. The book would have been far more enjoyable had it been edited more effectively.
For me, it was the sights and smells of the street which riveted my attention. It reminded me of the feeling I have when I read Dickens; the feeling that everything is larger than life. And this book provides glimpses into that world, a world of vibrancy and colour, but also a world of unimaginable squalor. Perhaps we are more inclined than we like to admit, to look through rose-tinted glasses at the Victorian age. This book is a revelation.