Unlike most of the other reviews on here, i didn’t get a free copy in exchange for an unbiased review and i don’t know any of the authors. I found a copy, most likely one of the aforementioned “free in exchange for a review” ones, in a Goodwill in Decatur and decided to give it a chance as a fan of the noir genre and in an attempt to gain a greater understanding of this strange city I have recently come to call home.
At the time of purchase i didn’t realize this “(City name) Noir” was such a prolific series published by Akashic books out of Brooklyn, already consisting of 75+ entries with more on the way, including such improbable locales as “Helsinki noir”, “cape cod noir” and “new haven noir”. Some cities, the ones that are more noir than others, even get multiple entries. My first thought, before i read any of the stories in this book, was that i should pick up the entries corresponding to other cities I’ve spent time in. Then i wondered how they had cranked out so many of these collections.
That question was answered as i started reading the stories. The quality control here is basically non existent, and in terms of “noir” the stories only really stay on brand by being consistently grim and mostly featuring quick, sloppy, cheap unhappy endings to wrap things up. Most of the authors featured here are published and many have multiple novels to their name but the stories themselves feel like quick throwaways, the stuff that gets passed around for critique at a Panera bread writers group meet up. With a few you can practically see the “prompt” that birthed the whole story.
1. Tananarive Due - Snowbound: two stars. The first story simply tells too much, a misstep repeated by most of these authors. Still, Due demonstrates an ability to craft suspense and ends the story in just the right spot, she just drags us through the paces for far too long on the way there. The plot is standard “there’s someone in the house” fare, but it doesn’t do much to dress it up when all you do is recount every detail you can possibly brainstorm of the life of a one dimensional character. What you end up with is a story, but what you’re missing is a reason for any of us to care.
2. Dallas Hudgens - Terceira: two stars. one of the most directly “noir” entries in the collection, Dallas Hudgens presents us with a comic book about crime in the form of a short story. The elements are there and a few moments are clever enough to remind me to keep turning the pages but the story contains all the depth and realism of a story written by a school kid, giving us the impression that the author has an equivalent level of real world experience with crime and violence. In short, nothing rings true enough here to create the illusion that the author might know what he’s talking about.
3. Brandon Massey - the prisoner: one star. This is tied for the worst story in the collection. The plot is a nonsense throwaway “21 jump street” episode with all the stilted dialogue and cardboard characters to match. That’s an insult to the original 21 jump street series, so all due respect to the parties involved. This guy couldn’t write his way out of a wet paper bag, and he’s a published author, so in a sense that’s kind of inspiring i guess. Without giving you any spoilers, nothing about this story makes any “real world” sense and if we can expect anything at all out of the wide definition of “noir” employed by this collection, can it be, at the very least, enough real world grit and realism to make the story faintly believable? Otherwise are you going to tell me that the saved by the bell episode where Jessie takes all the caffeine pills is noir?
4. Sheri Joseph -Kill Joy: three and a half stars: i enjoyed this one. Sheri Joseph can write, the plot propels itself along smoothly and the characters are fleshed out and real. She drops more back story on the economic plight of the narrator than we actually need, and i think the space could have been used to just show us more details about the parties involved. The ending is a bit abrupt but works in spite of itself. This story is believable and actually funny. Worth a read.
5. Gillian Royes - one-eyed woman: three stars. A good read, not noir in the slightest, but a fully fleshed out and believable character examination that manages to stray (mostly) from tedium despite a nearly complete absence of plot here. At the very least i believe what the author is telling me and I’m compelled to turn the page without shaking my head and furrowing my brow which is more than i can say for most of the rest of the collection
6. Anthony Grooms - Selah: three and a half stars. This is an interesting story, almost on a Poe/early lovecraft kind of vibe through the eyes of the narrator. From start to finish you’re kept guessing at just the level of the narrator’s insanity and also how supernatural the world of the story really is. I wish the author would have pushed the unreliable narrator trope a little further or taken us deeper into the realm of the supernatural to really leave us guessing, but this was an interesting read.
7. Tayari Jones - Caramel: four stars. This one is a slam dunk. Jones can write her ass of and gives us characters and setting that are believable, and situations that make sense. She also never for a second pulls back to offer mercy in a story that’s just so exceedingly grim. I was rooting for her the whole time, that she wouldn’t ruin the whole thing with a trick ending, and when she didn’t i wanted to cheer. Some of the characterization of the corrupt preacher is jettisoned for brevity, which is fair in the context of such a brief short story, but i wished for more. That’s my only complaint about this one. Definitely the best of the bunch. Jones edited the collection and i wish she would have held the rest of the authors to the standard of excellence she sets with this one.
8. David James Poissant - comet: three and a half stars. Far outside the confines of the noir genre but a great story, effectively told from the perspective of a child. The characters, viewed through this lense, are all fleshed out and familiar enough to seem real, as is the voice of the kid himself, no small feat for an adult author to pull off. Everything here is real enough, this is competent literary fiction and is probably the biggest oddball of the bunch, sharing very little in common with the rest of the collection aside from its setting on Stone Mountain just outside of Atlanta. A very enjoyable story.
9. Daniel Black - Come Ye Disconsolate: two stars. This guy can write and the idea of the story is there, but he never manages to connect the dots. The framework he used to plot this one is just too visible because he never makes the whole thing make sense to the characters involved, the desperate husband and his disgruntled wife. The set up is there but the question of “why” is left unanswered. An unhappy marriage and being forced to live in a semi-shitty part of Atlanta aren’t enough to justify the leaps in logic taken by the characters here, not without further explanation that we never receive.
10. Jennifer Harlow - the bubble: one star. The other big stinker of the bunch. This is young adult fiction written by an out of touch adult who has apparently picked up an outdated slang dictionary for tips on writing realistic modern teen dialogue (at one point a character uses “fleek” in a context that will send a shudder down your spine), with a gentle sprinkle of subtle racism on top (“didn’t even know people had boathouses and shit” is one line of dialogue the white woman who wrote this story came up for the black man to speak). Combine all of that with a plot equal parts stolen from that movie “hard candy” and that one with keanu reaves from a few years ago where those two girls torture him, and you’ve got this stinker that would have been ineligible for a passing grade in a high school creative writing class yet has somehow has seen print. This is worse than the story by Massey earlier in the book because while that one might put the thought in the head of an aspiring writer of “if this guy could do it, so could i, so could anybody” this one is more likely to make you think “oh fuck it all, why even bother”
11. Kenji Jasper - a moment of clarity at the Waffle House: 2 stars. The references are all here and they provide us branches to grasp onto as we tumble through the plot of this one. Those are the only links to the real world in another comic book-styled tale, with characters and melodrama cribbed from soap operas and no reason present for us to care about any of it. The last three lines are the best in the whole story and they are some of a scant few items of interest here that make me think this author has the capability to construct something more compelling.
12. Jim Grimsley - four in the morning in the new place: 2 stars. This is a rough draft of what could possibly be an interesting story. Or not. Either way, whatever is worth giving a shit about in this one is buried under so many paragraphs of exposition, it would take a brave editor with a machete to hack through it all and give us something that’s actually readable. Grimsley can write but i get the feeling that nobody has called him on his shit in awhile.
13. Alesia Parker - Ma’am: one and a half stars. This one gets an extra half a star to put it just slightly above the two one star entries in the collection because it’s not terrible the same way those two are, but it’s BAD. The ridiculous nature of letter that comprises most of the story being written in the exact same voice as the rest of the story seems to have escaped the author. nobody, i mean nobody would actually write a letter like this, let alone a character like the one who writes it. The plot itself is more pablum but there’s a sprinkle of compelling writing here. At least it ends in the right place.
14. John Holman - the fuck out: four stars. The book ends on a good note with this entry, again as far from noir as can be, but also one of the few stories in here worthy of a second read. Real characters, rich language and a consistent narrative drive a story where nothing in particular happens (in contrast to the gimmicks of the other entries in this collection) and we don’t need it to. Everything here rings true. I would check out more from Holman in the future.
So I’ll say that 6 of the 14 stories here are worth reading. I guess that leaves me with something closer to a 2.5 star review, but we’ll go ahead and round down in recognition of the editor’s lack of quality control or desire to stay on theme beyond the setting.